Cited by 14Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Think Globally, Act Locally: The Importance of Population‐Specific Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations for Muscle Mass Assessment

Barbosa‐Silva, Thiago G., Gonzalez, Maria Cristina, Bielemann, Renata M., Santos, Leonardo P., Menezes, Ana Maria B., the COCONUT Study Group, Brazil·2020·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a convenient muscle assessment method, but its accuracy highly depends on population‐specific aspects of the adopted equation. We aimed to develop appendicular lean mass (ALM) prediction models for older South Americans and to compare their performances to those of reference equations in the same sample. Methods: Cross‐sectional evaluation of 192 community‐dwelling Brazilian subjects ≥60 years old from the COMO VAI? study. Using measurements from single‐frequency and multifrequency devices (BIASF and BIAMF, respectively), new ALM prediction equations were developed (reference method: dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry [DXA]). Validity was assessed by bootstrapping. Four previously established equations were also tested, and the performances were compared using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Stepwise variable selection produced the following equations: ALM SF‐BIA = (2.08 × sex) + (0.04 × weight) + (0.24 × RI 50) + (0.07 × Xc 50) − 0.16; ALM MF‐BIA = (1.85 × sex) + (0.03 × weight) + (0.31 × RI 50) + (0.04 × Xc 50) + (0.01 × Z 5) − 8.16, where ALM is estimated in kg; female sex = 0 and male sex = 1; weight is measured in kg; RI 50 is the resistance index at 50 kHz measured in cm 2/Ω); Xc 50 is the reactance at 50 kHz measured in Ω; and Z 5 is impedance at 5 kHz measured in Ω. The equations explained, respectively, 89% and 90% of the variability of ALM DXA in our sample, and their estimates were not significantly different from DXA measurements. Bland–Altman analysis revealed accurate and unbiased performances for both models, with similar limits of agreement (BIA SF: ±2.58 kg; BIA MF: ±2.48 kg), and their validity was considered adequate by the bootstrap method. The reference equations, however, systematically overestimated ALM in our sample. Conclusion: The proposed equations might represent practical options to estimate ALM in older noninstitutionalized South Americans. Further external validation, though, is required to verify the reproducibility of our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jpen.1742

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbosa‐Silva, T. G., Gonzalez, M. C., Bielemann, R. M., Santos, L. P., Menezes, A. M. B., & the COCONUT Study Group, B.
Affiliations
  • Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology Federal University of Pelotas Pelotas Brazil
  • Postgraduate Program in Health and Behavior Catholic University of Pelotas Pelotas Brazil
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Pampa (BR)
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1338-1346
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2989589069
Cited by
14
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, appendicular lean mass, muscle mass assessment, prediction equations, older adults, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review