Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy

Open access
Wenning, Gregor K., Stankovic, Iva, Vignatelli, Luca, Fanciulli, Alessandra, Calandra‐Buonaura, Giovanna, Seppi, Klaus, Palma, Jose‐Alberto, Meissner, Wassilios G., Krismer, Florian, Berg, Daniela, Cortelli, Pietro, Freeman, Roy, Halliday, Glenda, Höglinger, Günter, Lang, Anthony, Ling, Helen, Litvan, Irene, Low, Phillip, Miki, Yasuo, Panicker, Jalesh, Pellecchia, Maria Teresa, Quinn, Niall, Sakakibara, Ryuji, Stamelou, Maria, Tolosa, Eduardo, Tsuji, Shoji, Warner, Tom, Poewe, Werner, Kaufmann, Horacio·2022·Movement Disorders
DOI 10.1002/mds.29005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. Objective: To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence‐based and consensus‐based methodology. Methods: We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. Results: The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. Conclusions: This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.29005

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Wenning, G. K., Stankovic, I., Vignatelli, L., Fanciulli, A., Calandra‐Buonaura, G., Seppi, K., Palma, J., Meissner, W. G., Krismer, F., Berg, D., Cortelli, P., Freeman, R., Halliday, G., Höglinger, G., Lang, A., Ling, H., Litvan, I., Low, P., Miki, Y., Panicker, J., Pellecchia, M. T., Quinn, N., Sakakibara, R., Stamelou, M., Tolosa, E., Tsuji, S., Warner, T., Poewe, W., & Kaufmann, H.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-21
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1131-1148
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
DOI
10.1002/mds.29005
OpenAlex
W4224213495
Cited by
833
References
78
FWCI
72.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.