Cited by 370Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Measuring childhood maltreatment to predict early-adult psychopathology: comparison of prospective informant-reports and retrospective self-reports

Open access
Newbury, Joanne B., Arseneault, Louise, Moffitt, Terrie E., Caspi, Avshalom, Danese, Andrea, Baldwin, Jessie R., Fisher, Helen L.·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Both prospective informant-reports and retrospective self-reports may be used to measure childhood maltreatment, though both methods entail potential limitations such as underestimation and memory biases. The validity and utility of standard measures of childhood maltreatment requires clarification in order to inform the design of future studies investigating the mental health consequences of maltreatment. The present study assessed agreement between prospective informant-reports and retrospective self-reports of childhood maltreatment, as well as the comparative utility of both reports for predicting a range of psychiatric problems at age 18. Data were obtained from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally-representative birth cohort of 2232 children followed to 18 years of age (with 93% retention). Childhood maltreatment was assessed in two ways: (i) prospective informant-reports from caregivers, researchers, and clinicians when children were aged 5, 7, 10 and 12; and (ii) retrospective self-reports of maltreatment experiences occurring up to age 12, obtained at age 18 using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Participants were privately interviewed at age 18 concerning several psychiatric problems including depression, anxiety, self-injury, alcohol/cannabis dependence, and conduct disorder. There was only slight to fair agreement between prospective and retrospective reports of childhood maltreatment (all Kappa's ≤ 0.31). Both prospective and retrospective reports of maltreatment were associated with age-18 psychiatric problems, though the strongest associations were found when maltreatment was retrospectively self-reported. These findings indicate that prospective and retrospective reports of childhood maltreatment capture largely non-overlapping groups of individuals. Young adults who recall being maltreated have a particularly elevated risk for psychopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.020

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding supports evidence from non-quasi experimental studies and suggests that maltreatment may affect broad factors underlying multiple disorders rather than disorder-specific risk factors.

    “This finding supports evidence from non-quasi experimental studies (62–66), and suggests that maltreatment may affect broad factors underlying multiple disorders (e.g., altered brain structure and function (67, 68), emotional dysregulation (69), or information-processing biases (70)) rather than disorder-specific risk factors (29).”

    From Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quasi-Experimental Studies (2023) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that childhood maltreatment was associated with a range of early-adult psychiatric problems, supporting the cross-disorder part of the claim. The paper does not test whether maltreatment affects broad underlying factors rather than disorder-specific risk factors; it also notes particularly strong associations with affective problems for retrospective reports. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Empirical comparisons between prospective and retrospective reports show poor agreement, with the reporting methods capturing two distinct groups of individuals.

    “Empirical comparisons between prospective and retrospective reports show poor agreement (Newbury et al., 2018), with the reporting methods capturing two distinct groups of individuals.”
  • Studies directly comparing retrospective and prospective reports of adverse childhood experiences have found slight to fair agreement rates.

    “Studies directly comparing retrospective and prospective reports of adverse childhood experiences have found slight to fair agreement rates (reviewed in Newbury et al., 2018, Reuben et al., 2016).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Newbury et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child The Science of Early Childhood Development Harvard University Cambridge, MA 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newbury, J. B., Arseneault, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Danese, A., Baldwin, J. R., & Fisher, H. L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Helen L.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
96
Pages
57-64
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760657291
Cited by
370
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 2
FWCI
37.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United Kingdom Medical Research Council (G1002190)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010309/1)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Development (HD077482)
  • Avielle Foundation
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • ESRC multidisciplinary studentships
  • MQ Fellows Award (MQ14F40)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child abuse, retrospective self-report, measurement agreement, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, depression, anxiety, self-harm, conduct disorder, memory bias, Environmental Risk Longitudinal Twin Study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychopathology, Retrospective Studies, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review