Cited by 354Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Nicotinic receptor subtypes and cognitive function

Open access
Levin, Edward D.·2002·Journal of Neurobiology

Abstract

Nicotinic receptor systems are involved in a wide variety of behavioral functions including cognitive function. Nicotinic medications may provide beneficial treatment for cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nicotine has been shown to improve attentional performance in all of these disorders. Better efficacy with fewer side effects might be achieved with novel nicotinic ligands selective for particular nicotinic subtypes. To develop these novel selective nicotinic ligands it is important to use animal models to determine the critical neurobehavioral bases for nicotinic involvement in cognitive function. Nicotine‐induced cognitive improvement in rats is most consistently seen in working memory tasks. We have found that both acute and chronic nicotine administration significantly improves working memory performance of rats in the radial‐arm maze. The pharmacologic and anatomic mechanisms for this effect have been examined in our laboratory in a series of local drug infusion studies. Both α4β2 and α7 nicotinic receptors in the ventral hippocampus and basolateral amygdala are involved in working memory function. Working memory impairments were caused by local infusion of either α4β2 or α7 antagonists. Ventral hippocampal α4β2 blockade‐induced working memory deficits are reversed by chronic systemic nicotine treatment, while ventral hippocampal α7 blockade‐induced working memory deficits were not found to be reversed by the same nicotine regimen. Interestingly, α4β2 and α7 induced deficits were not found to be additive in either the ventral hippocampus or the basolateral amygdala. In fact, in the amygdala, α7 antagonist cotreatment actually reversed the working memory impairment caused by α4β2 antagonist administration. These studies of the neural nicotinic mechanisms underlying cognitive function are key for opening avenues for development of safe and effective nicotinic treatments for cognitive dysfunction. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 53: 633–640, 2002

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/neu.10151

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Giacobini E, DeSarno P, Clark B, McIlhany M. 1989. The cholinergic receptor system of the human brain. Neuro- chemical and pharmacological aspects of aging and Alz- heimer. In: Nordberg A, editor. Progress in brain re- search. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p 335-343.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, E. D.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Edward D.
Venue
Journal of Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11-15
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
633-640
ISSN
  • 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4695
OpenAlex
W2025498694
Cited by
354
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da011943-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 64494, R01MH064494)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 11943)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, nicotinic receptor subtypes, alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor, alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, working memory, nicotine, cognitive enhancement, ventral hippocampus, basolateral amygdala, nicotinic antagonists, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, radial maze
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Cognition, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Nicotinic Agonists, Nicotinic Antagonists, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review