Cited by 112Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Abuse and TraumaObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Abuse victimization in childhood or adolescence and risk of food addiction in adult women

Open access
Mason, Susan M., Flint, Alan J., Field, Alison E., Austin, S. Bryn, Rich‐Edwards, Janet W.·2013·Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Child abuse appears to increase obesity risk in adulthood, but the mechanisms are unclear. This study examined the association between child abuse victimization and food addiction, a measure of stress-related overeating, in 57,321 adult participants in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII). DESIGN AND METHODS: The NHSII ascertained physical and sexual child abuse histories in 2001 and current food addiction in 2009. Food addiction was defined as ≥3 clinically significant symptoms on a modified version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Confounder-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Over 8% of the sample reported severe physical abuse in childhood, while 5.3% reported severe sexual abuse. Eight percent met the criteria for food addiction. Women with food addiction were 6 U of BMI heavier than women without food addiction. Severe physical and severe sexual abuse were associated with roughly 90% increases in food addiction risk (physical abuse RR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.76, 2.09; sexual abuse RR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.69, 2.05). The RR for combined severe physical abuse and sexual abuse was 2.40 (95% CI: 2.16, 2.67). CONCLUSIONS: A history of child abuse is strongly associated with food addiction in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20500

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous study linked ELA to altered central reward processing promoting excess food intake in some individuals.

    “Furthermore, a previous study linked ELA to altered central reward processing promoting excess food intake in some individuals [72].”

    From Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications (2017) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports an association between childhood abuse and food addiction and suggests that uncontrolled eating in response to distress may be part of the pathway to weight gain. The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses stress, brain reward function, and continued food consumption, but the study does not establish that early-life adversity alters central reward processing in the women studied. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Severe physical and sexual abuse are associated with a 90% increase in FA risk.

    “For example, data from the Nurses’ Health Study II has shown that severe physical and sexual abuse are associated with a 90% increase in FA risk [52].”
  • Childhood physical abuse and childhood sexual abuse both increase risk for food addiction by approximately 90%.

    “Not surprisingly, childhood physical abuse and childhood sexual abuse both increase risk for FA by approximately 90% [10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, S. M., Flint, A. J., Field, A. E., Austin, S. B., & Rich‐Edwards, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
Corresponding author
Mason, Susan M.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
E775-81
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2148628462
Cited by
112
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL064108, R01HL081557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
child abuse, food addiction, physical abuse, sexual abuse, childhood adversity, obesity risk, adult women, Yale Food Addiction Scale, Nurses' Health Study II
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Eating, Female, Humans, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Behavior, Addictive, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review