Cited by 178Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

An 8-month randomized controlled exercise trial alters brain activation during cognitive tasks in overweight children.

Open access
Krafft, Cynthia E., Schwarz, Nicolette F., Chi, Lingxi, Weinberger, Abby L., Schaeffer, David J., Pierce, Jordan E., Rodrigue, Amanda L., Yanasak, Nathan E. +4 more·2014·Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Children who are less fit reportedly have lower performance on tests of cognitive control and differences in brain function. This study examined the effect of an exercise intervention on brain function during two cognitive control tasks in overweight children. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants included 43 unfit, overweight (BMI ≥ 85th percentile) children 8- to 11-years old (91% Black), who were randomly divided into either an aerobic exercise (n = 24) or attention control group (n = 19). Each group was offered a separate instructor-led after-school program every school day for 8 months. Before and after the program, all children performed two cognitive control tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): antisaccade and flanker. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the exercise group decreased activation in several regions supporting antisaccade performance, including precentral gyrus and posterior parietal cortex, and increased activation in several regions supporting flanker performance, including anterior cingulate and superior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise may differentially impact these two task conditions, or the paradigms in which cognitive control tasks were presented may be sensitive to distinct types of brain activation that show different effects of exercise. In sum, exercise appears to alter efficiency or flexible modulation of neural circuitry supporting cognitive control in overweight children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20518

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Davis study involved overweight/obese children and used the anticascade task, while the Hillman study participants were of healthy weight status and used a flanker task.

    “It is important to note that the study conducted by Davis and colleagues involved overweight/obese children and used the anticascade task, while the participants in the Hillman study were of a healthy weight status and a flanker task was used.”

    From Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms (2016) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Methods (Participants and Data collection and analysis; page unavailable) confirm that this study enrolled overweight children and used an antisaccade task. The Methods also report a flanker task in the same children, while the cited paper does not establish that the Hillman study’s participants were of healthy weight. Thus it supports only part of the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Changes in brain activation patterns did not correspond with between-group differences in cognitive control following an 8-month exercise trial with overweight children.

    “By contrast, changes in brain activation patterns did not correspond with between-group differences in cognitive control following an 8-month exercise trial with overweight children. 52”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krafft, C. E., Schwarz, N. F., Chi, L., Weinberger, A. L., Schaeffer, D. J., Pierce, J. E., Rodrigue, A. L., Yanasak, N. E., Miller, P. H., Tomporowski, P. D., Davis, C. L., & McDowell, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Davis, Catherine L.
  • McDowell, Jennifer E.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
232-242
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1859879172
Cited by
178
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL087923, R01 HL87923)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
aerobic exercise, overweight children, cognitive control, brain activation, antisaccade task, flanker task, physical fitness, neural circuits, school-based exercise program, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior parietal cortex, childhood obesity
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Child, Cognition, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Overweight, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review