The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions
Open accessAbstract
A novel method for differentiating between correctly and incorrectly determined regions of protein structures based on characteristic atomic interactions is described. Different types of atoms are distributed nonrandomly with respect to each other in proteins. Errors in model building lead to more randomized distributions of the different atom types, which can be distinguished from correct distributions by statistical methods. Atoms are classified in one of three categories: carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O). This leads to six different combinations of pairwise noncovalently bonded interactions (CC, CN, CO, NN, NO, and OO). A quadratic error function is used to characterize the set of pairwise interactions from nine‐residue sliding windows in a database of 96 reliable protein structures. Regions of candidate protein structures that are mistraced or misregistered can then be identified by analysis of the pattern of nonbonded interactions from each window.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion
Bullough, P. A., Hughson, F. M., Skehel, J. J., & Wiley, D. C. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371037a0 · Cited by 1,564
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
Targeting of Ikaros to pericentromeric heterochromatin by direct DNA binding
Cobb, B. S., Morales-Alcelay, S., Kleiger, G., Brown, K. E., Fisher, A. G., & Smale, S. T. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.816400 · Cited by 252
PROKR2 missense mutations associated with Kallmann syndrome impair receptor signalling activity
Monnier, C., Dodé, C., Fabre, L., Teixeira, L., Labesse, G., Pin, J.-P., Hardelin, J.-P., & Rondard, P. (2009) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn318 · Cited by 123
Deep Learning Based Drug Screening for Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov
Zhang, H., Saravanan, K. M., Yang, Y., Hossain, M. T., Li, J., Ren, X., Pan, Y., & Wei, Y. (2020) · Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-020-00376-6 · Cited by 122
Alpha-Synuclein defects autophagy by impairing SNAP29-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion
Tang, Q., Gao, P., Arzberger, T., Höllerhage, M., Herms, J., Höglinger, G., & Koeglsperger, T. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04138-0 · Cited by 103
Unusual diheme conformation of the heme-degrading protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Chim, N., Iniguez, A., Nguyen, T. Q., & Goulding, C. W. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.025 · Cited by 102
Flück, C. E., Pandey, A. V., Dick, B., Camats, N., Fernández-Cancio, M., Clemente, M., Gussinyé, M., Carrascosa, A., Mullis, P. E., & Audi, L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020178 · Cited by 94
Sarkar, S., Banerjee, A., Chakraborty, N., Soren, K., Chakraborty, P., & Bandopadhyay, R. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2019.12.004 · Cited by 73
Identification and validation of novel serum markers for early diagnosis of endometriosis
Gajbhiye, R., Sonawani, A., Khan, S., Suryawanshi, A., Kadam, S., Warty, N., Raut, V., & Khole, V. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der410 · Cited by 53
Grover, A., Katiyar, S. P., Jeyakanthan, J., Dubey, V. K., & Sundar, D. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-s7-s20 · Cited by 52
Li, W., Zhang, F., Wu, R., Jia, L., Li, G., Guo, Y., Liu, C., & Wang, G. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.00259 · Cited by 34
Malmirchegini, G. R., Sjodt, M., Shnitkind, S., Sawaya, M. R., Rosinski, J., Newton, S. M., Klebba, P. E., & Clubb, R. T. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.583013 · Cited by 33
New Biological Insights from Better Structure Models
Touw, W. G., Joosten, R. P., & Vriend, G. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.002 · Cited by 31
Single-Cell Transcriptomics To Define Plasmodium falciparum Stage Transition in the Mosquito Midgut
Mohammed, M., Dziedziech, A., Sekar, V., Ernest, M., Alves E Silva, T. L., Balan, B., Emami, S. N., Biryukova, I., Friedländer, M. R., Jex, A., et al. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03671-22 · Cited by 25
Benchmarking protein language models for protein crystallization
Mall, R., Kaushik, R., Martinez, Z. A., Thomson, M. W., & Castiglione, F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86519-5 · Cited by 20
A suite of designed protein cages using machine learning and protein fragment-based protocols
Meador, K., Castells-Graells, R., Aguirre, R., Sawaya, M. R., Arbing, M. A., Sherman, T., Senarathne, C., & Yeates, T. O. (2024) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2024.02.017 · Cited by 19
Self-citationSun, L., Zheng, Z.-M., Shao, C.-S., Zhang, Z.-Y., Li, M.-W., Wang, L., Wang, H., Zhao, G.-H., & Wang, P. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15060740 · Cited by 17
Drug Target Prioritization for Alzheimer's Disease Using Protein Interaction Network Analysis
Podder, A., Pandit, M., & Narayanan, L. (2018) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2018.0131 · Cited by 14
Nogueira, K. M. V., Mendes, V., Kamath, K. S., Cheruku, A., Oshiquiri, L. H., de Paula, R. G., Carraro, C., Pedersoli, W. R., Pereira, L. M. S., Vieira, L. C., et al. (2024) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02279-9 · Cited by 12
Using deep-learning predictions of inter-residue distances for model validation
Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Chojnowski, G., Keegan, R. M., & Rigden, D. J. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322010415 · Cited by 11
Hossain, M. M., Adhikari, J., Dutta, A., Khandaker, A., Islam, S., Rahman, M. M., & Shibly, A. Z. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0331339 · Cited by 11
Murmu, S., Rashmi, M., Nagrale, D. T., Kour, T., Singh, M. K., Chaurasia, A., Behera, S. K., Shankar, R., Ranjan, R., Jha, G. K., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cotton Research · doi:10.1186/s42397-024-00203-z · Cited by 7
Wadapurkar, R., Singh, S., & Singh, A. (2024) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.087 · Cited by 6
A Proposal for a Consolidated Structural Model of the CagY Protein of Helicobacter pylori
López-Luis, M. A., Soriano-Pérez, E. E., Parada-Fabián, J. C., Torres, J., Maldonado-Rodríguez, R., & Méndez-Tenorio, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242316781 · Cited by 4
Bostancioglu, S. M., & Mutlu, O. (2025) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-024-08433-5 · Cited by 4
Thahsin, N., Khan, K. I., Sarwar, A. N. M. R., Sakib, M. N., & Rahman, M. S. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.csbr.2024.100029 · Cited by 2
Putative staphylococcal enterotoxin possesses two common structural motifs for MHC-II binding
Rahman, S., Saha, S., Dasgupta, S. B., & Das, A. K. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128437
Metadata
- Authors
- Colovos, C., & Yeates, T. O.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1511-1519
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2102993309
- Cited by
- 4,498
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
