The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations
Abstract
Interpretation of regression coefficients is sensitive to the scale of the inputs. One method often used to place input variables on a common scale is to divide each numeric variable by its standard deviation. Here we propose dividing each numeric variable by two times its standard deviation, so that the generic comparison is with inputs equal to the mean ±1 standard deviation. The resulting coefficients are then directly comparable for untransformed binary predictors. We have implemented the procedure as a function in R. We illustrate the method with two simple analyses that are typical of applied modeling: a linear regression of data from the National Election Study and a multilevel logistic regression of data on the prevalence of rodents in New York City apartments. We recommend our rescaling as a default option—an improvement upon the usual approach of including variables in whatever way they are coded in the data file—so that the magnitudes of coefficients can be directly compared as a matter of routine statistical practice. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients
Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00012.x · Cited by 3,027
A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology
Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., Goodwin, C. E. D., Robinson, B. S., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4794 · Cited by 2,094
GRAHAM, M. H., & SVOLIK, M. W. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000052 · Cited by 1,044
Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models
Schielzeth, H., & Forstmeier, W. (2009) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arn145 · Cited by 952
Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields
Oldfield, E. E., Bradford, M. A., & Wood, S. A. (2019) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-5-15-2019 · Cited by 802
Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition
Bradford, M. A., Berg, B., Maynard, D. S., Wieder, W. R., & Wood, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12507 · Cited by 669
Prediction of Psilocybin Response in Healthy Volunteers
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030800 · Cited by 369
Braun, J. M., Kalkbrenner, A. E., Just, A. C., Yolton, K., Calafat, A. M., Sjödin, A., Hauser, R., Webster, G. M., Chen, A., & Lanphear, B. P. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1307261 · Cited by 328
Elevation alters ecosystem properties across temperate treelines globally
Mayor, J. R., Sanders, N. J., Classen, A. T., Bardgett, R. D., Clément, J.-C., Fajardo, A., Lavorel, S., Sundqvist, M. K., Bahn, M., Chisholm, C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21027 · Cited by 325
A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition
Bradford, M. A., Veen, G. F., Bonis, A., Bradford, E. M., Classen, A. T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Crowther, T. W., De Long, J. R., Freschet, G. T., Kardol, P., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0367-4 · Cited by 280
Madigan, S., Eirich, R., Pador, P., McArthur, B. A., & Neville, R. D. (2022) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4116 · Cited by 272
Evidence of experimental bias in the life sciences: why we need blind data recording
Holman, L., Head, M. L., Lanfear, R., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190 · Cited by 263
Madigan, S., Korczak, D. J., Vaillancourt, T., Racine, N., Hopkins, W. G., Pador, P., Hewitt, J. M. A., AlMousawi, B., McDonald, S., & Neville, R. D. (2023) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00036-6 · Cited by 242
Human disturbance and upward expansion of plants in a warming climate
Dainese, M., Aikio, S., Hulme, P. E., Bertolli, A., Prosser, F., & Marini, L. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3337 · Cited by 185
The spatial structure of Phanerozoic marine animal diversity
Close, R. A., Benson, R. B. J., Saupe, E. E., Clapham, M. E., & Butler, R. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay8309 · Cited by 170
Kämpfen, F., Kohler, I. V., Ciancio, A., Bruine de Bruin, W., Maurer, J., & Kohler, H.-P. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241895 · Cited by 173
Is supplementary feeding in gardens a driver of evolutionary change in a migratory bird species?
Plummer, K. E., Siriwardena, G. M., Conway, G. J., Risely, K., & Toms, M. P. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13070 · Cited by 146
Generalised scepticism: how people navigate news on social media
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1450887 · Cited by 146
Acevedo‐Charry, O., & Aide, T. M. (2019) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.06252 · Cited by 113
Airline itinerary choice modeling using machine learning
Lhéritier, A., Bocamazo, M., Delahaye, T., & Acuna-Agost, R. (2019) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2018.02.002 · Cited by 114
Pennino, M. G., Bachiller, E., Lloret-Lloret, E., Albo-Puigserver, M., Esteban, A., Jadaud, A., Bellido, J. M., & Coll, M. (2020) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111399 · Cited by 95
Partisan asymmetry in temporal stability of climate change beliefs
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Ripberger, J. T., Silva, C. L., Carlson, D. E., Gupta, K., Carlson, N., Ter-Mkrtchyan, A., & Dunlap, R. E. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0719-y · Cited by 92
snRNA-seq stratifies multiple sclerosis patients into distinct white matter glial responses
Macnair, W., Calini, D., Agirre, E., Bryois, J., Jäkel, S., Smith, R. S., Kukanja, P., Stokar-Regenscheit, N., Ott, V., Foo, L. C., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.016 · Cited by 88
Neuroinflammation in Huntington’s Disease: New Insights with 11 C-PBR28 PET/MRI
Lois, C., González, I., Izquierdo-García, D., Zürcher, N. R., Wilkens, P., Loggia, M. L., Hooker, J. M., & Rosas, H. D. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00072 · Cited by 84
Embryo dune development drivers: beach morphology, growing season precipitation, and storms
van Puijenbroek, M. E. B., Limpens, J., de Groot, A. V., Riksen, M. J. P. M., Gleichman, M., Slim, P. A., van Dobben, H. F., & Berendse, F. (2017) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4144 · Cited by 83
Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major)
Grabowska-Zhang, A. M., Wilkin, T. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arr189 · Cited by 78
The Past, Present, and Future of Experimental Methods in the Social Sciences
Mize, T. D., & Manago, B. (2022) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102799 · Cited by 76
A demonstration of conservation genomics for threatened species management
Wright, B. R., Farquharson, K. A., McLennan, E. A., Belov, K., Hogg, C. J., & Grueber, C. E. (2020) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13211 · Cited by 69
Partner choice versus punishment in human Prisoner’s Dilemmas
Barclay, P., & Raihani, N. (2016) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.12.004 · Cited by 67
Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking
Saalfeld, V., Ramadan, Z., Bell, V., & Raihani, N. J. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.180569 · Cited by 52
Morris, W. K., Vesk, P. A., McCarthy, M. A., Bunyavejchewin, S., & Baker, P. J. (2015) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1346 · Cited by 51
Fracture Risk Assessment: State of the Art, Methodologically Unsound, or Poorly Reported?
Collins, G. S., & Michaëlsson, K. (2012) · Current Osteoporosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11914-012-0108-1 · Cited by 51
Widespread agrochemicals differentially affect zooplankton biomass and community structure
Hébert, M., Fugère, V., Beisner, B. E., Barbosa da Costa, N., Barrett, R. D. H., Bell, G., Shapiro, B. J., Yargeau, V., Gonzalez, A., & Fussmann, G. F. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2423 · Cited by 34
Basu, S., & Narayanaswamy, R. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001147 · Cited by 33
Sensitivity analysis in multiple imputation in effectiveness studies of psychotherapy
Crameri, A., von Wyl, A., Koemeda, M., Schulthess, P., & Tschuschke, V. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01042 · Cited by 24
Divided by the jab: Affective polarisation based on COVID vaccination status
Wagner, M., & Eberl, J.-M. (2025) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2024.2352449 · Cited by 24
Predicting domestic abuse (fairly) and police risk assessment
Turner, E., Brown, G., & Medina-Ariza, J. (2022) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2022a11 · Cited by 22
Crabb, M., & Hanson, V. L. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/2856046 · Cited by 20
Simonson, M. D., Block Jr, R., Druckman, J. N., Ognyanova, K., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2024) · doi:10.1017/9781009415842 · Cited by 17
Nguyen, C. G. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/e2wm6 · Cited by 15
Exploring gaps, biases, and research priorities in the evidence for reptile conservation actions
Speight, O., Morgan, W. H., White, T. B., Sainsbury, K. A., Bouskila, A., Rotem, G., Smith, R. K., Sutherland, W. J., Watson, M. J., & Christie, A. P. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70073 · Cited by 11
Tolerability, assessment, and prediction of psilocybin-induced altered states of consciousness
Studerus, E. (2012) · University of Zurich · doi:10.5167/uzh-164092 · Cited by 6
Steffman, J., & Chow, C. (2026) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309261461547
Mignault, M.-C., Tissera, H., Human, L. J., & Lydon, J. E. (2023) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104417
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelman, A.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2865-2873
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2099737847
- Cited by
- 2,522
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
