Cited by 15Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overview

The historical development of zoo elephant survivorship

Open access
Scherer, Lara, Bingaman Lackey, Laurie, Clauss, Marcus, Gries, Katrin, Hagan, David, Lawrenz, Arne, Müller, Dennis W. H., Roller, Marco +2 more·2023·Zoo Biology

Abstract

In the discussion about zoo elephant husbandry, the report of Clubb et al. (2008, Science 322: 1649) that zoo elephants had a "compromised survivorship" compared to certain non-zoo populations is a grave argument, and was possibly one of the triggers of a large variety of investigations into zoo elephant welfare, and changes in zoo elephant management. A side observation of that report was that whereas survivorship in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) improved since 1960, this was not the case in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). We used historical data (based on the Species360 database) to revisit this aspect, including recent developments since 2008. Assessing the North American and European populations from 1910 until today, there were significant improvements of adult (≥10 years) survivorship in both species. For the period from 1960 until today, survivorship improvement was significant for African elephants and close to a significant improvement in Asian elephants; Asian elephants generally had a higher survivorship than Africans. Juvenile (<10 years) survivorship did not change significantly since 1960 and was higher in African elephants, most likely due to the effect of elephant herpes virus on Asian elephants. Current zoo elephant survivorship is higher than some, and lower than some other non-zoo populations. We discuss that in our view, the shape of the survivorship curve, and its change over time, are more relevant than comparisons with specific populations. Zoo elephant survivorship should be monitored continuously, and the expectation of a continuous trend towards improvement should be met.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21733

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherer, L., Bingaman Lackey, L., Clauss, M., Gries, K., Hagan, D., Lawrenz, A., Müller, D. W. H., Roller, M., Schiffmann, C., & Oerke, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Hendersonville North Carolina USA
  • Indianapolis Zoo (US)
  • Halle Zoo (DE)
  • Tier‐Erlebnispark Bell Bell Germany
  • German Primate Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Clauss, Marcus
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-08
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
328-338
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W4294991026
Cited by
15
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
zoo elephants, Loxodonta africana, Asian elephant, zoo animal husbandry, juvenile mortality, zoo animal welfare
MeSH terms
Survivorship, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Elephants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review