The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–997 of 997
Economic Games for Social Scientists
Eckel, C. C. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404681-8.00015-7 · Cited by 9
Vernon Smith: economics as a laboratory science
Eckel, C. C. (2004) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.007 · Cited by 9
Leading by Example? Investment Decisions in a Mixed Sequential-Simultaneous Public Bad ExperimentPreprint
van der Heijden, E., & Moxnes, E. (2003) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Giving in dictator games -- Experimenter demand effect or preference over the rules of the game?
Chlab, N., & Moffatt, P. G. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e629522012-013 · Cited by 9
Social Norms of Sharing in High School: Teen Giving in the Dictator GamePreprint
Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., Johnson, C. A., et al. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1883785 · Cited by 9
Another experimental look at reciprocal behavior: indirect reciprocity
Bonein, A., Serra, D., Università Degli Studi Di Milano-Bicocca, & Università Degli Studi Di Cagliari (2007) · Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · Cited by 9
Experimental Results on Bargaining Under Alternative Property Rights RegimesPreprint
Croson, R. T. A., & Johnston, J. S. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.169150 · Cited by 9
Dynamic Pricing of Limited Inventories When Customers NegotiatePreprint
Kuo, C.-W., Ahn, H., & Aydın, G. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1910617 · Cited by 9
Gleasure, R. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2023.2295312 · Cited by 10
Do dictator games measure altruism?
Zizzo, D. J. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849804745.00018 · Cited by 9
Testing the Foundations of Quantal Response Equilibrium
McCubbins, M. D., Turner, M. B., & Weller, N. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_16 · Cited by 8
Culture or anonymity? Differences in proposer behaviour in Korea and Germany
Horak, S. (2015) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12142 · Cited by 8
Tammi, T. T. (2013) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.01.002 · Cited by 8
Information and anti-American attitudes
Delavande, A., & Zafar, B. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.002 · Cited by 8
Rojas, C. A., & Cinner, J. E. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106661 · Cited by 8
Trust, Fear, Reciprocity, and Altruism: Theory and Experiment
Cox, J. C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68660-6_5 · Cited by 8
Joint Forest Management: Experience and Modeling
Chakrabarti, M., Datta, S. K., Howe, E. L., & Nugent, J. B. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3518-7_11 · Cited by 8
Cooper, R. B., & Johnson, N. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.08.005 · Cited by 8
Pfaff, A. S. P., & Vélez, M. A. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.009 · Cited by 8
Neoliberalism in the Laboratory? Experimental Economics on Markets and their Limits
Santos, A. C., & Rodrigues, J. (2013) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.829433 · Cited by 11
L'apport de l'économie expérimentale dans l'élaboration des politiques publiques
Ferey, S., Gabuthy, Y., & Jacquemet, N. (2013) · Revue française d économie · doi:10.3917/rfe.132.0155 · Cited by 4
Conditional cooperation and the effect of punishment
Kirchkamp, O., & Mill, W. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.035 · Cited by 8
Effect of reduced opportunities on bargaining outcomes: an experiment with status asymmetries
Banerjee, S. (2020) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-020-09754-4 · Cited by 8
Chavanne, D., McCabe, K., & Paganelli, M. P. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 8
Self-citationKatzir, M., Cohen, S., & Halali, E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104192 · Cited by 8
Testing the single-peakedness of other-regarding preferences
Levati, M. V., Nicholas, A., & Rai, B. K. (2014) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.001 · Cited by 8
The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals
Stevens, J. R., & King, A. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015 · Cited by 8
Please, Marry Me! An Experimental Study of Risking a Joint Venture
Güth, W., Ivanova‐Stenzel, R., & Tjøtta, S. (2004) · Metroeconomica · doi:10.1111/j.0026-1386.2004.00179.x · Cited by 8
McAdams, R. H., & Nadler, J. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.431782 · Cited by 8
Determinants of Successful Cooperation in a Face-to-Face Social DilemmaPreprint
Darai, D., & Grätz, S. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5167/uzh-51789 · Cited by 8
Moral property rights and bargaining
Gächter, S., & Riedl, A. M. (2002) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-004374966 · Cited by 9
Communication in Asymmetric Group Competition Over Public GoodsPreprint
Zhang, J. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.5167/uzh-61675 · Cited by 17
Bargaining with Asymmetric Dispute CostsPreprint
Pecorino, P., & Boening, M. V. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.922063 · Cited by 6
When Income Depends on Performance and Luck: The Effects of Culture and Information on GivingPreprint
Rey‐Biel, P., Sheremeta, R. M., & Uler, N. (2017) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.13016/m2sj19r1r · Cited by 8
Why Can’t We Be Friends? - Entitlements and the Costs of ConflictPreprint
Kimbrough, E. O., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2141620 · Cited by 8
Harrington, J. E., Hérnan-Gonzalez, R., & Kujal, P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2530568 · Cited by 8
Essays on altruism and health care markets
Persson, B. (2001) · Cited by 8
Vuong, Q. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cwt7j · Cited by 8
The Cognitive and Behavioral Economics of EnvyPreprint
Zizzo, D. J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.989360 · Cited by 8
Social Preferences: Fundamental Characteristics and Economic ConsequencesPreprint
Fehr, E., & Charness, G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4467961 · Cited by 10
The morality of markets in theory and empirics
Choi, G. S., & Storr, V. H. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.019 · Cited by 7
Using Economic Experiments to Measure Informal Institutions
Jakiela, P. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107300361.013 · Cited by 7
Accounting for context: Separating monetary and (uncertain) social incentives
Bergh, A., & Wichardt, P. C. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2017.11.002 · Cited by 5
Eber, N. (2011) · Journal of Economics · doi:10.1007/s00712-010-0189-1 · Cited by 7
Is a “Firm” a Firm? A Stackelberg Experiment
Hildenbrand, A. (2013) · Economics · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2013-20 · Cited by 7
The pursuit of self‐interest and rule breaking in an anonymous situation
Nogami, T., & Yoshida, F. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12056 · Cited by 7
A neural signature of private property rights.
Sääksvuori, L., Hewig, J. S., Hecht, H., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/npe0000049 · Cited by 6
Enhanced anonymity in tax experiments does not affect compliance
Kogler, C., Olsen, J., & Bogaers, R. I. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.06.023 · Cited by 9
Mobility in a Globalised World 2018
Sucky, E., Obermeier-Hartmann, C., Zitzmann, I., Dobhan, A., Klötzer, C., Ankenbrand, K., Linß, I., Eberhardt, L., Biethahn, N., Tubbesing, F., et al. (2019) · Schriftenreihe Logistik und Supply Chain Management · doi:10.20378/irbo-54827 · Cited by 7
Allocating Costly Influence in Legislatures
Provins, T., Monroe, N. W., & Fortunato, D. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/717853 · Cited by 7
Charitable giving with stochastic income
Jackson, K. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101826 · Cited by 9
The effect of loss aversion and entitlement on cheating: An online experiment
Ortiz, J. M., Zindel, M., & Silva, S. D. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103843 · Cited by 8
Equity Concerns Are Narrowly Framed
Exley, C. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2024) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20220266 · Cited by 17
Bicchieri, C., & Zhang, J. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51676-3.50020-8 · Cited by 7
Altruism and Spite in a Selfish Gene Model of Endogenous Preferences
Burnham, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Bioeconomics · doi:10.1023/a:1020569617214 · Cited by 7
Shame for money: Shame enhances the incentive value of economic resources
Wang, C. C., Cheng, Y., Chiou, W., & Kung, C. C. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · Cited by 7
Inequality aversion, social discount, and time discount rates
Ida, T., & Ogawa, K. (2012) · International Journal of Social Economics · doi:10.1108/03068291211214181 · Cited by 7
Medición y manipulación de normas sociales en juegos experimentales de corrupción
Belaus, A., Reyna, C., & Freidín, E. (2016) · Cuadernos de Economía · doi:10.15446/cuad.econ.v35n68.44395 · Cited by 7
Halvorsen, T. (2015) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463115605302 · Cited by 7
Takagishi, H., Fujii, T., Nishina, K., & Okada, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31446 · Cited by 8
The political economy of targeting – a critical review
Schüring, E., & Gassmann, F. (2016) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12185 · Cited by 8
Lenski, R. E., & Burnham, T. C. (2017) · Journal of Bioeconomics · doi:10.1007/s10818-017-9258-7 · Cited by 7
Behavioural Analytics: Exploring judgments and choices in large data sets
Durbach, I. N., & Montibeller, G. (2018) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2018.1434400 · Cited by 7
Matarazzo, O., Pizzini, B., & Greco, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00013 · Cited by 7
Can Shorter Transfer Chains and Transparency Reduce Embezzlement?
Falco, S. D., Magdalou, B., David Masclet, B., Villeval, M. C., & Willinger, M. (2020) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000119 · Cited by 7
Chapter 55 Testing Theories of Other-regarding Behavior: A Sequence of Four Laboratory Studies
Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., Katok, E., et al. (2008) · Handbook of experimental economics results · doi:10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00055-8 · Cited by 7
Somebody may scold you! A dictator experiment
Festré, A., & Garrouste, P. (2014) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2014.09.005 · Cited by 8
Valuing Others: Evidence from Economics, Developmental Psychology, and Neurobiology
Billeke, P. B., Soto‐Icaza, P., Aspé-Sánchez, M., Villarroel, V., & Rodríguez‐Sickert, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_2 · Cited by 7
Does Might Make Right? An Experiment on Assigning Property Rights
Czap, H. J., Czap, N. V., Burbach, M. E., et al. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.007 · Cited by 7
Social Learning: A Route to Good Cue Orders
García‐Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., Woike, J. K., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0012 · Cited by 7
Reciprocity: The Behavioral Foundations of Socio-Economic Games
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_26 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPrice‐setting power and information asymmetry in sealed bidding
Parco, J. E. (2006) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1279 · Cited by 5
Utility-Based Altruism: Evidence from Experiments
Kritikos, A. S., & Bolle, F. (2005) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230522343_9 · Cited by 7
Durlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230280847_3 · Cited by 8
Cooperative Behaviour and Institutions
Vatn, A. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230362437_6 · Cited by 8
Bargaining Over Time in Ultimatum Game ExperimentsPreprint
Berger, R. D., Rauhut, H., Prade, S., & Helbing, D. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1596049 · Cited by 6
Emotions, Morality and Public Goods: The WTA-WTP Disparity Revisited
Nilsson, A., Johansson‐Stenman, O., & Biel, A. (2006) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 7
Using Experimental Data to Model Bargaining Behavior in Ultimatum GamesPreprint
Sunder, S., & Lin, H. H. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.268755 · Cited by 7
Worker or Shirker - Who Evades More Taxes? A Real Effort ExperimentPreprint
Bühren, C., & Kundt, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2284156 · Cited by 7
When it's Not All About Me: Altruism, Participation, and Political ContextPreprint
Kam, C. D., Cranmer, S., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1008208 · Cited by 7
Magen, S. (2007) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783845202693-185 · Cited by 6
Is It Just Legitimacy of Endowments? { An Experimental Analysis of Unilateral Giving {Preprint
Mittone, L., & Ploner, M. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 7
Why and How Identity Should Influence UtilityPreprint
Wichardt, P. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.878273 · Cited by 9
Instrument Choice and Motivation: Evidence from a Climate Change ExperimentPreprint
Goeschl, T., & Perino, G. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1658360 · Cited by 7
Measuring Norms: A Comparison of the Predictive and Descriptive Power of Three MethodsPreprint
Aycinena, D., Bogliacino, F., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4663919 · Cited by 7
The Heart Has Its Reasons: Social Rationality in Mate Choice
Lenton, A. P., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0016 · Cited by 6
Autorisation à l'échange sur des externalités
Bertrand, É. (2014) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.652.0439 · Cited by 6
Dutcher, E. G., Salmon, T. C., & Saral, K. J. (2024) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-024-09844-y · Cited by 24
Ours, not yours: Property rights, poaching and deterrence in common-pool resources
Geest, L. R. D., Kidwai, A. H., & Portillo, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102452 · Cited by 6
Inter-brain synchronization is weakened by the introduction of external punishment
Li, J., Pan, J., Zhu, C., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab124 · Cited by 6
Wang, J., Qu, S., Li, R., & Fu, Y. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277294 · Cited by 6
Probabilistic Persuasion: A Brunswikian Theory of Argumentation
Reimer, T. O., Hertwig, R., & Sipek, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0004 · Cited by 9
Malawski, M., & Roy, J. (2005) · Decyzje · Cited by 6
Winking, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115419 · Cited by 7
The constitutional political economy of virtual worlds
Mildenberger, C. D. (2013) · Constitutional Political Economy · doi:10.1007/s10602-013-9140-0 · Cited by 6
¡Tómelo o déjelo! Evidencia experimental sobre racionalidad, preferencias sociales y negociación
Palacio, L., & Parra, D. (2015) · Lecturas de Economía · doi:10.17533/udea.le.n82a3 · Cited by 6
The endogenous nature of the measurement of social preferences
Smith, J. B. (2012) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-012-0110-4 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
