The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 997
Discrimination by Gender and Social DistancePreprint
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Muren, A. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 34
Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others’ Incomes?Preprint
Zizzo, D. J., Oswald, A. J., Zizzo, D. J., et al. (2000) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.269339 · Cited by 34
The Theory of Minds Within the Theory of Games
McCubbins, M. D., Turner, M. B., & Weller, N. (2012) · Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University) · Cited by 40
Smile, Dictator, You're on Camera
Buchanan, J. A., McMahon, M. K., Simpson, M., et al. (2017) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12214 · Cited by 33
Social comparisons and reference group formation: Some experimental evidence
McDonald, I. M., Nikiforakis, N., Olekalns, N., & Sibly, H. (2013) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.12.003 · Cited by 33
Instrument Choice and Motivation: Evidence from a Climate Change Experiment
Goeschl, T., & Perino, G. (2011) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9524-4 · Cited by 40
Sakai, J. T., Dalwani, M. S., Gelhorn, H. L., Mikulich‐Gilbertson, S. K., & Crowley, T. J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036158 · Cited by 32
The Effect of Stake Size in Experimental Bargaining and Distribution Games: A Survey
Karagözoğlu, E., & Urhan, Ü. B. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-016-9490-x · Cited by 32
Effort and Fairness in Bargaining Games
Franco‐Watkins, A. M., Edwards, B., & Acuff, R. E. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.762 · Cited by 33
A critical note on the theory of inequity aversion
Bergh, A. (2008) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.008 · Cited by 33
Experimental Moralities: Ethics in Classroom Experiments
Stodder, J. (1998) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220489809597946 · Cited by 33
Children’s helping behavior in an ethnic intergroup context: Evidence for outgroup helping.
Sierksma, J., Lansu, T. A. M., Karremans, J. C., & Bijlstra, G. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000478 · Cited by 31
Carpenter, J. P. (2005) · Review of Radical Political Economics · doi:10.1177/0486613404272330 · Cited by 33
Can Groups Be Trusted? An Experimental Study of Collective TrustPreprint
McEvily, B., Weber, R. A., Bicchieri, C., & Ho, V. T. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.323223 · Cited by 33
When are Women More Generous than Men?Preprint
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.895709 · Cited by 33
Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools
Snowberg, E., & Yariv, L. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24781 · Cited by 28
Chiou, W., Chen, S., & Liao, D.-C. (2013) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0035 · Cited by 31
Internal and External Validity in Experimental Games: A Social Reality Check
Jackson, C. (2011) · European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/ejdr.2011.47 · Cited by 33
When to diversify, and with whom? Choosing partners among out-group strangers in lowland Bolivia
Pisor, A. C., & Gurven, M. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.09.003 · Cited by 31
Rees, M. R., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Diekmann, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04729-5 · Cited by 36
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LOSS AVERSION IN CONTESTS
Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y., & Ramalingam, A. (2017) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12505 · Cited by 34
What Is Fair? Experimental Evidence
Dickinson, D. L., & Tiefenthaler, J. (2002) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2002.tb00500.x · Cited by 109
Transfers and the effect of monitoring in an overlapping-generations experiment
van der Heijden, E. C. M., Nelissen, J. H. M., Potters, J., et al. (1998) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(97)00070-6 · Cited by 32
Market Power in International Carbon Emissions Trading: A Laboratory Test
Carlén, B. (2003) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol24-no3-1 · Cited by 32
On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum game
Weg, E., & Smith, V. L. S. (1993) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(93)90038-m · Cited by 32
Self-citationFamiliarity and trust: an experimental investigation
Barr, A. M. (1999) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 30
Identifying and Defending the Hard Core of Virtue Ethics
Alfano, M. (2013) · Journal of Philosophical Research · doi:10.5840/jpr20133812 · Cited by 29
Parallels in Preschoolers' and Adults' Judgments About Ownership Rights and Bodily Rights
de Vondervoort, J. W. V., & Friedman, O. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12154 · Cited by 31
Private and Public Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Evidence from Children’s Behavior
Houser, D. E., Montinari, N., & Piovesan, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041568 · Cited by 30
Self‐serving biases: evidence from a simulated labour relationship
Charness, G. B., & Haruvy, E. E. (2000) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940010378045 · Cited by 29
The Social Epistemology of Experimental Economics
Santos, A. C. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203874332 · Cited by 31
Increasing the external validity of social preference games by reducing measurement error
Wang, X., & Navarro‐Martinez, D. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.006 · Cited by 31
Kube, M., Hilgers, D., Koch, G., et al. (2014) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-014-0756-y · Cited by 30
The influence of decision power on distributive fairness
Rode, J., & Menestrel, M. L. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.003 · Cited by 32
Under trusting eyes: the responsive nature of trust
Pelligra, V. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154.006 · Cited by 29
Social norms of sharing in high school: Teen giving in the dictator game
Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., Johnson, C. A., de Oliveira, A. C. M., Rojas, C., & Wilson, R. K. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.017 · Cited by 33
Akerlof, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.022 · Cited by 30
Oxoby, R. J., & Spraggon, J. M. (2012) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00493.x · Cited by 30
Bargaining and Dilemma Games: From Laboratory Data Towards Theoretical Synthesis
Bolton, G. E. (1998) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01669346 · Cited by 31
Direct Tests of Models of Social Preferences and a New ModelPreprint
Cox, J. C., & Sadiraj, V. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.976027 · Cited by 27
The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions
Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. B. (2011) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e634112013-270 · Cited by 30
Fair and Impartial Spectators in Experimental Economic Behavior
Smith, V. L. S., & Wilson, B. J. (2014) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000001 · Cited by 30
Self-citationFrohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629806064346 · Cited by 29
Jakiela, P. (2012) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9332-x · Cited by 29
Why We Believe: Religion as a Human Universal
Norenzayan, A. (2010) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_4 · Cited by 29
Sharing one’s fortune? An experimental study on earned income and giving
Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.014 · Cited by 29
The Computational Complexity of Valuation and Motivational Forces in Decision-Making Processes
Redish, A. D., Schultheiss, N. W., & Carter, E. C. (2015) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_375 · Cited by 28
Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. P. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15064 · Cited by 29
Cochard, F., Couprie, H., & Hopfensitz, A. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9524-5 · Cited by 27
Giving to whom? Altruism in different types of relationships
DeScioli, P., & Krishna, S. (2012) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.003 · Cited by 28
Secular rule of law erodes believers' political intolerance of atheists
Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2013.794749 · Cited by 32
Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games
Rodríguez-Lara, I. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.007 · Cited by 28
Hillman, A. L. (2019) · Cited by 27
Altruism Behind Bars: Sharing, Justice, Perspective Taking and Empathy Among Inmates
Gummerum, M., & Hanoch, Y. (2012) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0149-8 · Cited by 28
Fixed position and property rights in sequential resource dilemmas under uncertainty
Suleiman, R., Rapoport, A., & Budescu, D. V. (1996) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(96)00008-x · Cited by 28
Reciprocity and Giving in a Consecutive Three-Person Dictator Game with Social Interaction
Bahr, G., & Requate, T. (2013) · German Economic Review · doi:10.1111/geer.12013 · Cited by 30
Servátka, M., Tucker, S. J., & Vadovič, R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.003 · Cited by 25
A Test of Game-Theoretic and Behavioral Models of Play in Exchange and Insurance Environments
DECK, C. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1546 · Cited by 28
Machery, É. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000178 · Cited by 29
Physical Attractiveness and Altruism in Two Modified Dictator Games
Bhogal, M. S., Galbraith, N. D., & Manktelow, K. I. (2016) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2016.1199382 · Cited by 30
The Neural Bases of Social Influence on Valuation and Behavior
Izuma, K. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805308-9.00016-6 · Cited by 33
Small is beautiful—Experimental evidence of donors’ preferences for charities
Borgloh, S., Dannenberg, A., & Aretz, B. (2013) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.011 · Cited by 27
The Effects of Aggregation and Timing on Budgeting: An Experiment
Nikias, A. D., Schwartz, S. T., Spires, E. E., Wollscheid, J. R., & Young, R. A. (2010) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.67 · Cited by 24
Public goods provision, inequality and taxes
Uler, N. (2010) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9268-y · Cited by 27
Chapter 5 On the External Validity of Laboratory Experiments on Corruption
Armantier, O., & Boly, A. (2012) · Research in experimental economics · doi:10.1108/s0193-2306(2012)0000015007 · Cited by 27
The effect of privacy concerns on social network formation
Gaudeul, A., & Giannetti, C. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.007 · Cited by 26
Yang, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Chen, H. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17020460 · Cited by 29
Self-interest and equity in a bargaining tournament with non-linear payoffs
Shogren, J. F. (1997) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00027-3 · Cited by 27
Elite Capture, Political Voice and Exclusion from Aid: An Experimental StudyPreprint
D’Exelle, B., & Riedl, A. M. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1261458 · Cited by 27
Toward a Rule-Based Model of Human Choice: On the Nature of Homo Constitutionalus
Congleton, R. D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_34 · Cited by 27
Self-protection promotes altruism
Chan, E. Y. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.004 · Cited by 26
Boylan, S. J. (2010) · Journal of the American Taxation Association · doi:10.2308/jata.2010.32.2.73 · Cited by 26
Ownership Dilemmas: The Case of Finders Versus Landowners
DeScioli, P., Karpoff, R., & Freitas, J. D. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12486 · Cited by 27
Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory
Kaufman, A., & Englander, E. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0822-0 · Cited by 28
Models of decision-making and the coevolution of social preferences
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., McElreath, R. L., Alvard, M., Barr, A. M., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05460148 · Cited by 26
Are people samaritans or avengers
Ottone, S. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 26
Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Contributions
Burnham, T. C., & Hare, B. A. (2007) · Cited by 27
Pentecostalism as an Informal Political Institution: Experimental Evidence from Ghana
McCauley, J. F. (2014) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048314000480 · Cited by 25
Identifying Altruism in the Laboratory
Harrison, G. W., & Johnson, L. T. (2006) · Research in experimental economics · doi:10.1016/s0193-2306(06)11008-x · Cited by 25
Microeconomics for MBAs: The Economic Way of Thinking for Managers
McKenzie, R. B., & Lee, D. R. (2020) · Cited by 24
An experimental study of sorting in group contests
Brookins, P., Lightle, J. P., & Ryvkin, D. (2015) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2015.03.011 · Cited by 23
The dynamics of behavior in modified dictator games
Brosig‐Koch, J., Riechmann, T., & Weimann, J. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176199 · Cited by 25
Deterring poaching of a common pool resource
Geest, L. R. D., Stranlund, J. K., & Spraggon, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.06.006 · Cited by 24
Price Fairness in the Era of the Sharing Economy
Chark, R. (2018) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965518790221 · Cited by 26
Game theory’s role in role-playing
Bolton, G. E. (2002) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(02)00027-4 · Cited by 25
Aktipis, C., & Kurzban, R. (2005) · Advances in Austrian economics · doi:10.1016/s1529-2134(04)07007-3 · Cited by 18
Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: experimental economics and evolutionary psychology
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2000) · Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · Cited by 25
Self-citationDirect Tests of Individual Preferences for Efficiency and EquityPreprint
Cox, J. C., & Sadiraj, V. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1769912 · Cited by 25
Only Mine or All Ours: Do Stronger Entitlements Affect Altruistic Choices in the Household
Dasgupta, U., & Mani, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.021 · Cited by 25
Espín, A. M., Moreno‐Herrero, D., Sánchez‐Campillo, J., & Martín, J. A. R. (2016) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9828-8 · Cited by 24
Is earned bargaining power more fully exploited?
Feltovich, N. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.021 · Cited by 24
Heterogeneous norms: Social image and social pressure when people disagree
Velde, V. L. T. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.013 · Cited by 27
Sharing is daring: An experiment on consent, chilling effects and a salient privacy nudge
Hermstrüwer, Y., & Dickert, S. (2017) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.irle.2017.06.001 · Cited by 25
Are group members less inequality averse than individual decision makers?
He, H., & Villeval, M. C. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.004 · Cited by 24
Brañas‐Garza, P., Durán, M. A., & Espinosa, M. P. (2011) · Bulletin of Economic Research · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00357.x · Cited by 24
People Playing Games: The Human Face of Experimental Economics
Eckel, C. C. (2007) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2007.tb00807.x · Cited by 24
The Far-Reaching Effects of Power: At the Individual, Dyadic, and Group Levels
Galinsky, A. D., Chou, E. Y., Halevy, N., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2012) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2012)0000015007 · Cited by 26
Determination of first movers in sequential bargaining games: An experimental study
Sonnegård, J. (1996) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(96)00014-1 · Cited by 24
Evolutionary psychology and economic theory
Koppl, R. (2004) · Advances in Austrian economics · doi:10.1016/s1529-2134(2005)7 · Cited by 11
Lezzi, E., Fleming, P., & Zizzo, D. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2594659 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
