The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 997
Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving
Ben‐Ner, A., Kong, F., & Putterman, L. G. (2003) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(03)00065-5 · Cited by 252
Currency value moderates equity preference among young children
Blake, P. R., & Rand, D. G. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.012 · Cited by 290
Civic Capital as the Missing Link
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2011) · Handbook of social economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53187-2.00010-3 · Cited by 340
Civic Capital as the Missing Link
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2010) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15845 · Cited by 269
Reciprocity, Self-interest, and the Welfare State
Fong, C. M., Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. M. (2004) · Nordisk tidskrift för politisk ekonomi · Cited by 250
ON THE NATURE OF RECIPROCAL MOTIVES
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2005) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1093/ei/cbi043 · Cited by 245
Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms
Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. K. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.648 · Cited by 253
A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (1997) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00058.x · Cited by 251
Burnham, T. C., & Hare, B. A. (2007) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9012-2 · Cited by 258
The role of envy in ultimatum games
Kirchsteiger, G. (1994) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90106-6 · Cited by 249
Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic ExperimentsPreprint
Zizzo, D. J. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1163863 · Cited by 249
The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness
Sally, D., & Hill, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015 · Cited by 247
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Muren, A. (2005) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.11.007 · Cited by 248
The Hedonistic Paradox: Is homo economicus happier?
Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2007) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.006 · Cited by 245
Trust and Expected Trustworthiness: Experimental Evidence From Zimbabwean Villages
Barr, A. M. (2003) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00150 · Cited by 239
Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults
Murnighan, J. K., & Saxon, M. S. (1998) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(98)00017-8 · Cited by 245
Identifying Social Norms using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?Preprint
Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1310598 · Cited by 247
Klaus Abbink, A., Irlenbusch, B., & Elke Renner, B. (2000) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00089-5 · Cited by 235
The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions
Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. B. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.767 · Cited by 246
Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game
Ben‐Ner, A., Putterman, L. G., Kong, F., & Magan, D. (2003) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2002.12.001 · Cited by 230
Emotional Dimensions of Social Movements
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2007) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470999103.ch18 · Cited by 251
The relative price of fairness: gender differences in a punishment game
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00854-2 · Cited by 215
Fowler, J. H. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00453.x · Cited by 226
Market Signaling of Personal CharacteristicsPreprint
Fremling, G. M., & Posner, R. A. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.193490 · Cited by 186
The impact of inequality, gender, external assistance and social capital on local-level cooperation
Molinas, J. (1998) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(97)10066-3 · Cited by 213
Economics and Social Interaction
(2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154 · Cited by 220
Klaus Abbink, A., & Sadrieh, A. (2009) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.08.024 · Cited by 215
The effect of stakes in distribution experiments
Carpenter, J. P., Verhoogen, E., & Burks, S. V. (2004) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2004.08.007 · Cited by 211
Experimental economics: Where next?
Binmore, K., & Shaked, A. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.10.019 · Cited by 206
Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study
Croson, R. T. A. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00857-8 · Cited by 207
Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior
Haisley, E., & Weber, R. A. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.08.002 · Cited by 200
How the Grapevine Keeps You in Line
Beersma, B., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611405073 · Cited by 220
What Determines Giving to Hurricane Katrina Victims? Experimental Evidence on Racial Group Loyalty
Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. P. (2009) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.1.2.64 · Cited by 195
Do People Care About Social Context? Framing Effects in Dictator Games
Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., & Rand, D. G. (2012) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9341-9 · Cited by 221
Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112324108 · Cited by 193
Field Experiments in Economics
Carpenter, J. P., Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2005) · Research in experimental economics · doi:10.1016/s0193-2306(2005)10 · Cited by 191
Smith, V. L. S. (1998) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.1998.tb00125.x · Cited by 262
Self-citationConcerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game
Piazza, J. R., & Bering, J. M. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002 · Cited by 187
WHEN ARE WOMEN MORE GENEROUS THAN MEN?
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2006) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1093/ei/cbj042 · Cited by 196
Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity
Brañas‐Garza, P. (2005) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.005 · Cited by 179
What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us About the Real World
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2006) · Cited by 176
When the Bases of Social Hierarchy Collide: Power Without Status Drives Interpersonal Conflict
Anicich, E. M., Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1019 · Cited by 177
Bowles, S., & Hwang, S. (2008) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.03.006 · Cited by 176
The Role of Emotion in Economic BehaviorPreprint
Rick, S. I., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.954862 · Cited by 202
Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs about Others' Altruism
Tella, R. D., Truglia, R. N. P., Babino, A., & Sigman, M. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141409 · Cited by 173
Trust, Reciprocity, and Other-Regarding Preferences: Groups Vs. Individuals and Males Vs. Females
Cox, J. C. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5196-3_14 · Cited by 173
Fong, C. M., & Luttmer, E. F. P. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.010 · Cited by 172
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2007) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.4.135 · Cited by 179
Dominance, Status, and Social Hierarchies
Cummins, D. D. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9780470939376.ch23 · Cited by 168
Strategy and Fairness in Social Decision Making: Sometimes It Pays to Be Powerless
van Dijk, E., & Vermunt, R. C. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1392 · Cited by 167
Two-Level Ultimatum Bargaining with Incomplete Information: an Experimental Study
Güth, W., Huck, S., & Ockenfels, P. (1996) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2235565 · Cited by 161
The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy
Gowdy, J. (2004) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3654741 · Cited by 181
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort CompetitionPreprint
Gill, D. M., & Prowse, V. L. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1501972 · Cited by 159
Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., & Smith, V. L. S. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.13421 · Cited by 159
Self-citationThe Social Context of Negotiation
Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P. L., & Newton, E. (1993) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002793037004003 · Cited by 156
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History: A Re-examination
Ortmann, A., Fitzgerald, J., & Boeing, C. (2000) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1009946125005 · Cited by 159
Expectations and fairness in a modified Ultimatum game
Suleiman, R. (1996) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(96)00029-3 · Cited by 153
McAdams, R. H., & Nadler, J. (2005) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00032.x · Cited by 147
Gender differences in the laboratory: evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games
Ortmann, A., & Tichy, L. K. (1999) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(99)00038-4 · Cited by 155
Norms, Conformity, and Controls
Tayler, W. B., & Bloomfield, R. J. (2011) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00398.x · Cited by 145
NEEDS VERSUS ENTITLEMENTS-AN INTERNATIONAL FAIRNESS EXPERIMENT
Cappelen, A. W., Moene, K. O., Sørensen, E. Ø., et al. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12000 · Cited by 155
Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level
Ben‐Ner, A., Kramer, A., & Levy, O. (2008) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.11.004 · Cited by 149
Emotions and cooperation in economic games
Haselhuhn, M. P., & Mellers, B. A. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.005 · Cited by 150
Theory and experiment: What are the questions?
Smith, V. L. S. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.008 · Cited by 152
Self-citationHow Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective
Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., & Cloutier, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616677828 · Cited by 164
Psychological Foundations of IncentivesPreprint
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.294287 · Cited by 144
Fahr, R., & Irlenbusch, B. (2000) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(99)00236-0 · Cited by 150
A little fairness may induce a lot of redistribution in democracy
Tyran, J., & Sausgruber, R. (2004) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.09.014 · Cited by 150
Voter turnout: a social theory of political participation
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1757 · Cited by 147
Social Entrepreneurial Intention Formation of Corporate Volunteers
Förster, F., & Grichnik, D. (2013) · Journal of Social Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/19420676.2013.777358 · Cited by 155
Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Mata, J. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01143.x · Cited by 155
The Effects of Introducing Mixed Payment Systems for Physicians: Experimental Evidence
Brosig‐Koch, J., Hennig‐Schmidt, H., Kairies‐Schwarz, N., & Wiesen, D. (2015) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3292 · Cited by 161
Intentionality detection and “mindreading”: Why does game form matter?
McCabe, K., Smith, V. L. S., & LePore, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.8.4404 · Cited by 148
Self-citationAltruism and social integration
Brañas‐Garza, P., Cobo‐Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovářík, J., & Ponti, G. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.10.014 · Cited by 149
Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social SciencesPreprint
Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1501976 · Cited by 153
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611424225 · Cited by 150
Knowing When to Ask: The Cost of Leaning In
Exley, C. L., Niederle, M., & Lise Vesterlund, C. (2019) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/704616 · Cited by 147
Dictator Games: A Meta StudyPreprint
Engel, C. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1568732 · Cited by 154
Attitudes to Income Inequality
Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2014) · Handbook of income distribution · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59428-0.00014-x · Cited by 147
Anticipated verbal feedback induces altruistic behavior
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.001 · Cited by 135
Reciprocity, Trust, and Payoff Privacy in Extensive Form Bargaining
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., & Smith, V. L. S. (1998) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1998.0638 · Cited by 140
Self-citationAn experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: The nature of beneficent behavior
Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (1998) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00091-2 · Cited by 138
A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity
Brosnan, S. F. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00043 · Cited by 134
Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., & Heydasch, T. (2011) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.830 · Cited by 142
The Cultural Evolution of Religion
Bulbulia, J. A., Geertz, A. W., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E. E. A., Evans, N., François, P., Gintis, H. M., Gray, R. D., Henrich, J., Jordon, F. M., et al. (2013) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9894.003.0026 · Cited by 140
Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done?
Kachelmeier, S. J., & Towry, K. L. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.571 · Cited by 129
Martin, A., & Olson, K. R. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615568998 · Cited by 141
Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: An experiment
Benndorf, V., Kübler, D. F., & Normann, H. (2015) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.005 · Cited by 131
What Are Punishment and Reputation for?
Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E. J., & Tooby, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045662 · Cited by 139
Oxoby, R. J., & McLeish, K. N. (2004) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.011 · Cited by 134
Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and EconomicsPreprint
Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.229937 · Cited by 134
A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games
Belot, M. V. K., Duch, R. M., & Miller, L. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.007 · Cited by 128
Money, depletion, and prosociality in the dictator game
Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., & Wagner, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/npe0000031 · Cited by 132
Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., & Moore, J. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00178-0 · Cited by 133
Altruism towards strangers in need: costly signaling in an industrial society
Bereczkei, T., Birkás, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.004 · Cited by 129
The effort and risk-taking effects of budget-based contracts
Sprinkle, G. B., Williamson, M. G., & Upton, D. (2008) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.11.001 · Cited by 130
The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game
Bosman, R., Sutter, M., & van Winden, F. A. A. M. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2004.12.005 · Cited by 123
Talking money: How market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection
Neuteleers, S., & Engelen, B. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.022 · Cited by 129
On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms
Banerjee, R. (2015) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-015-9436-1 · Cited by 126
Kerschbamer, R. (2015) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.008 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
