The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Elinor Ostrom, B. (2009) · Springer series in game theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_13 · Cited by 137
On Expectations and the Monetary Stakes in Ultimatum Games
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528347.010 · Cited by 132
Self-citationThe price you pay: cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment
Nelissen, R. M. A. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.01.001 · Cited by 127
Motives for Sharing in Social Networks
Ligon, E. A., & Schechter, L. (2011) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.12.002 · Cited by 139
Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.286428 · Cited by 124
Deontological coherence: A framework for commonsense moral reasoning.
Holyoak, K. J., & Powell, D. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000075 · Cited by 124
What's in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum GamesPreprint
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.292857 · Cited by 121
Self-interest and fairness: self-serving choices of justice principles
Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Garrido, L. J. B. M. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9295-3 · Cited by 115
Cooperation based on trust. An experimental investigation
Güth, W., Ockenfels, P., & Wendel, M. (1997) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(96)00045-1 · Cited by 120
Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: Offer games
Rapoport, A., & Sundali, J. A. (1996) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/bf01803952 · Cited by 119
Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: the effects of the Wenchuan earthquake
Rao, L., Han, R., Ren, X., Bai, X., Zheng, R., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Li, J., Zhang, K., & Li, S. (2010) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.002 · Cited by 117
Parochial altruism in inter-group conflicts
Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2012) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.083 · Cited by 117
Natural-field dictator game shows no altruistic giving
Winking, J., & Mizer, N. J. (2013) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.002 · Cited by 124
Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks
Greiner, B., & Levati, M. V. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2004.04.003 · Cited by 111
COMPARING STUDENTS TO WORKERS: THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL FRAMING ON BEHAVIOR IN DISTRIBUTION GAMES
Carpenter, J. P., Burks, S. V., & Verhoogen, E. (2005) · Research in experimental economics · doi:10.1016/s0193-2306(04)10007-0 · Cited by 112
The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study
Cooper, D. J., & Dutcher, E. G. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9280-x · Cited by 116
Markets and Motives Trust and Egoism in Welfare Markets
Taylor‐Gooby, P. (1999) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279499005450 · Cited by 116
Kim, J., Kaufmann, K., & Stegemann, M. (2013) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-013-9261-2 · Cited by 114
Rutström, E. E., & Williams, M. B. (2000) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00109-8 · Cited by 115
Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study
Chesney, T., Chuah, S., & Hoffmann, R. F. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.026 · Cited by 113
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
Anonymity in the dictator game revisited
Franzén, A., & Pointner, S. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.005 · Cited by 114
The social neuroscience of reputation
Izuma, K. (2012) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2012.01.003 · Cited by 117
Pro-social motivation, effort and the call to public service
Banuri, S., & Keefer, P. E. (2015) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.10.011 · Cited by 112
Does competition affect giving?
Duffy, J. F., & Kornienko, T. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.001 · Cited by 113
The Contribution of Behavioral Economics to Political Science
Wilson, R. K. (2011) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041309-114513 · Cited by 111
Rational moralists: The role of fairness in democratic economic politics
Eichenberger, R., & Oberholzer‐Gee, F. (1998) · Public Choice · doi:10.1023/a:1004961414101 · Cited by 111
A Tractable Model of Reciprocity and FairnessPreprint
Cox, J. C., Friedman, D., & Gjerstad, S. D. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.376981 · Cited by 111
Player Types and Self-Impression Management in Dictatorship Games: Two Experiments
Murnighan, J. K., Oesch, J. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2001) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.2001.0847 · Cited by 108
Risk, Reward, and Economic Decision Making in Aging
Roalf, D. R., Mitchell, S. H., Harbaugh, W. T., & Janowsky, J. S. (2011) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr099 · Cited by 107
The Presence of Others, Prosocial Traits, Machiavellianism
Kerekes, Z. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000032 · Cited by 118
Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims
Gächter, S., & Riedl, A. M. (2006) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-006-0141-z · Cited by 109
Humanomics: Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century
Smith, V. L. S., & Wilson, B. J. (2019) · Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) · Cited by 108
Self-citationVertical Foreclosure in Experimental Markets
Martin, S., Normann, H., & Snyder, C. M. (2001) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2696364 · Cited by 108
SHRIEKING SIRENS: SCHEMATA, SCRIPTS, AND SOCIAL NORMS. HOW CHANGE OCCURS
Bicchieri, C., & McNally, P. (2018) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052518000079 · Cited by 108
Borzaga, C., & Depedri, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154.007 · Cited by 113
Payment systems in the healthcare industry: An experimental study of physician incentives
Green, E. P. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.05.009 · Cited by 98
Comparing Corruption in the Laboratory and in the Field in Burkina Faso and in Canada
Armantier, O., & Boly, A. (2012) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12019 · Cited by 101
Minimally Acceptable Altruism and the Ultimatum Game
Rotemberg, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.008 · Cited by 116
Charity Begins at Home: Cultural Differences in Social Discounting and Generosity
Strombach, T., Jin, J. K., Weber, B., Kenning, P. H., Shen, Q., Ma, Q., & Kalenscher, T. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1802 · Cited by 102
Managing Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships
Kurzban, R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9780470939376.ch22 · Cited by 102
Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment
Harrison, G. W., & McCabe, K. (1996) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02425260 · Cited by 100
Self-citationCooperation in Experimental Games of Strategic Complements and Substitutes
Potters, J., & Suetens, S. (2006) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00548.x · Cited by 101
Trust, Repute, and the Role of Nonprofit Enterprise
Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. J. (2003) · Nonprofit and civil society studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_5 · Cited by 100
Examining the role of fairness in high stakes allocation decisions
List, J. A., & Cherry, T. L. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.09.021 · Cited by 99
How fair shares compare: Experimental evidence from two cultures
Jakiela, P. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.017 · Cited by 97
Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0537 · Cited by 98
Neural correlates of economic game playing
Krüeger, F., Grafman, J. H., & McCabe, K. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0165 · Cited by 101
Self-citationScheres, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-35 · Cited by 98
The Impact of Ethics Education on Reporting Behavior
Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9854-5 · Cited by 113
The physiology of moral sentiments
Zak, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.11.009 · Cited by 97
Decomposing desert and tangibility effects in a charitable giving experiment
Reinstein, D. A., & Riener, G. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9298-0 · Cited by 90
Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship games
Schotter, A., Weiss, A., & Zapater, I. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00863-3 · Cited by 96
Individual sense of fairness: an experimental study
Karni, E., Salmon, T., & Sopher, B. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9165-1 · Cited by 94
Effort, luck, and voting for redistribution
Lefgren, L. J., Sims, D., & Stoddard, O. B. (2016) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.012 · Cited by 90
Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game
Chavez, A. K., & Bicchieri, C. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.09.004 · Cited by 91
Order of Play in Strategically Equivalent Games in Extensive Form
Rapoport, A. (1997) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s001820050021 · Cited by 93
Leadership, cheap talk and really cheap talk
Levy, D. M., Padgitt, K., Peart, S. J., Houser, D. E., & Xiao, E. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.018 · Cited by 85
Trust and reciprocity: implications of game triads and social contexts
Cox, J. C. (2009) · New Zealand Economic Papers · doi:10.1080/00779950903005473 · Cited by 91
An experimental investigation of Hobbesian jungles
Powell, B., & Wilson, B. J. (2007) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.011 · Cited by 86
James Andreoni, A., Harbaugh, W. T., & Vesterlund, L. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230280786_2 · Cited by 92
Corrupt reciprocity – Experimental evidence on a men's game
Lambsdorff, J. G., & Frank, B. (2011) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.irle.2011.04.002 · Cited by 90
The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining
Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00891-8 · Cited by 90
Mental accounting and other-regarding behavior: Evidence from the lab
Cherry, T. L. (2001) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(01)00058-7 · Cited by 90
Jacobsson, F., Johannesson, M., & Borgqúist, L. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02049.x · Cited by 89
Trust in Private and Common Property Experiments
Cox, J. C., Elinor Ostrom, B., Walker, J. M., Castillo, A. J., Coleman, E. A., Holahan, R., Schoon, M., & Steed, B. C. (2009) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2009.tb00942.x · Cited by 81
Concessions, Violence, and Indirect Rule: Evidence from the Congo Free State
Lowes, S., & Montero, E. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab021 · Cited by 111
Social preferences and moral biases
Croson, R. T. A., & Konow, J. (2008) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.10.007 · Cited by 86
Trust Building Among Strangers
Ho, T., & Weigelt, K. (2005) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0350 · Cited by 88
Touching a Teddy Bear Mitigates Negative Effects of Social Exclusion to Increase Prosocial Behavior
Tai, K., Zheng, X., & Narayanan, J. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611404707 · Cited by 90
List, J. A., & Cherry, T. L. (2000) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01669205 · Cited by 122
The white-man effect: How foreigner presence affects behavior in experiments
Cilliers, J., Dube, O., & Siddiqi, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.015 · Cited by 85
Fiedler, M., & Haruvy, E. E. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.07.013 · Cited by 82
Moral distance in dictator games
Aguiar, F., Brañas‐Garza, P., & Miller, L. M. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000917 · Cited by 100
The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset
Wang, L., Zhong, C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.004 · Cited by 87
Esarey, J., Salmon, T. C., & Barrilleaux, C. J. (2011) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00394.x · Cited by 79
The Connection Between Stakeholder Theory and Stakeholder Democracy
Moriarty, J. (2012) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650312439296 · Cited by 96
Honesty in Managerial ReportingPreprint
Evans, J. H., Hannan, R. L., Krishnan, R., et al. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.269448 · Cited by 83
Preferences and constraints: the value of economic games for studying human behaviour
Pisor, A. C., Gervais, M. M., Purzycki, B. G., & Ross, C. T. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.192090 · Cited by 82
Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025936712704 · Cited by 81
Parochialism in preschool boys' resource allocation
Benozio, A., & Diesendruck, G. (2014) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.002 · Cited by 87
Social Utility in Ultimatum Bargaining
Handgraaf, M. J. J., van Dijk, E., & Cremer, D. D. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025940829543 · Cited by 77
Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M. (2008) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000151494 · Cited by 79
Smith, V. L. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364 · Cited by 83
Self-citationZaki, J., López, G., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst005 · Cited by 79
Measuring costly effort using the slider task
Gill, D. M., & Prowse, V. L. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2018.11.003 · Cited by 79
SOCIAL PREFERENCES AND TAX POLICY DESIGN: SOME EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
Ackert, L. F., Martínez-Vázquez, J., & Rider, M. (2007) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00048.x · Cited by 78
Anonymity and the voluntary provision of public goods
Laury, S. K., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. W. (1995) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)00073-n · Cited by 78
experimental methods in economics
Smith, V. L. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230280786_16 · Cited by 78
Self-citationSocial preferences aren’t preferences
Wilson, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.013 · Cited by 77
Alpízar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson‐Stenman, O. (2008) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9194-9 · Cited by 77
Gee, L., Migueis, M., & Parsa, S. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9516-5 · Cited by 77
Exchange and Specialisation as a Discovery Process
Crockett, S., Smith, V. L. S., & Wilson, B. J. (2009) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02254.x · Cited by 76
Self-citationCochard, F., Gallo, J. L., Georgantzís, N., & Tisserand, J.-C. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101613 · Cited by 79
Human Altruism – Proximate Patterns and Evolutionary Origins
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2005-0101 · Cited by 76
Schnedler, W., & Vadovič, R. (2011) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00315.x · Cited by 90
Prosocial Compliance in P2P Lending: A Natural Field Experiment
Du, N., Li, L., Lu, T., & Lu, X. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3216 · Cited by 73
Social-status ranking: a hidden channel to gender inequality under competition
Schram, A. J. H. C., Brandts, J., & Gërxhani, K. (2018) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-018-9563-6 · Cited by 71
Meeting now suggests we will meet again: Implications for debates on the evolution of cooperation
Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01747 · Cited by 79
Rapoport, A., Erev, I., & Zwick, R. (1995) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.3.377 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
