The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 997
Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand
de Quidt, J., Haushofer, J., & Roth, C. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23470 · Cited by 25
Meta-Analysis of Inequality Aversion EstimatesPreprint
Nunnari, S., & Pozzi, M. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4169385 · Cited by 22
Läpple, D., & Osawe, O. W. (2022) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12347 · Cited by 23
Inequality aversion and the house money effect
Dannenberg, A., Riechmann, T., Sturm, B., et al. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9308-2 · Cited by 23
Bediou, B., Sacharin, V., Hill, C. R., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2012) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0151-1 · Cited by 23
Agent Behavior Between Maximization and Cooperation
Ebenhöh, E., & Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2008) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463108089546 · Cited by 23
Hoppe, E. I., & Schmitz, P. W. (2014) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2014.11.001 · Cited by 24
Sakai, J. T., Dalwani, M. S., Mikulich‐Gilbertson, S. K., McWilliams, S. K., Raymond, K. M., & Crowley, T. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151678 · Cited by 25
Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner’s Dilemma Depends on Players’ Contributions
Bland, A. R., Roiser, J. P., Mehta, M. A., Schei, T. S., Sahakian, B. J., Robbins, T. W., & Elliott, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01017 · Cited by 25
Kerschbamer, R., Neururer, D., & Gruber, A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.021 · Cited by 24
The dark side of friendship: ‘envy’
Cobo‐Reyes, R., & Jiménez, N. (2012) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9313-0 · Cited by 23
Cognitive ability and in-group bias: An experimental study
Paetzel, F., & Sausgruber, R. (2016) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.04.006 · Cited by 25
Control it and it is yours: Children's reasoning about the ownership of living things
Espinosa, J., & Starmans, C. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104319 · Cited by 22
Bühren, C., & Pleßner, M. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1812 · Cited by 24
Mixed signals: Charity reporting when donations signal generosity and income
Bracha, A., & Lise Vesterlund, C. (2017) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.03.001 · Cited by 23
Prosocial and moral behavior under decision reveal in a public environment
Andersson, P., Erlandsson, A., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101561 · Cited by 21
Competition versus cooperation: Some experimental evidence
Canegallo, C., Ortona, G., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., & Scacciati, F. (2007) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.045 · Cited by 22
Sorting and Social Preferences
Lazear, E. P., Malmendier, U. M., & Weber, R. A. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6571436 · Cited by 22
TRUST AND RECIPROCITY: AN INTERNATIONAL EXPERIMENT
Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E. J., Chen, B., et al. (2001) · Cited by 22
Auditors' Strategies to Protect Their Litigation Reputation: A Research Note
McCracken, S. A. (2003) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.165 · Cited by 20
Firm-specific cost savings and market power
Davis, D. D., & Wilson, B. J. (2001) · Studies in economic theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56448-2_4 · Cited by 22
Engle‐Warnick, J., & Ruffle, B. J. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.310339 · Cited by 22
Information, Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in BargainingPreprint
Karagözoğlu, E., & Riedl, A. M. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1648364 · Cited by 20
Camerer, C. F. (2008) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2384-1 · Cited by 20
Acosta, L. M., Hagan, C. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2017) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn22.1.54 · Cited by 27
Redistribution and Beliefs about the Source of Income Inequality
Valero, V. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8 · Cited by 23
Leadership, information, and risk attitude: A game theoretic approach
Kulas, J., Komai, M., & Grossman, P. J. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.002 · Cited by 22
Provider altruism in health economics
Galizzi, M. M., Tammi, T., Godager, G., Linnosmaa, I., & Wiesen, D. (2015) · STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) · Cited by 22
Negotiating a Fair Value under Accounting Uncertainty: A Laboratory Experiment
Wang, K. J. (2010) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.109 · Cited by 21
Kelsey, D. H., & Spanjers, W. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00230.x · Cited by 19
Reputation Management in Children on the Autism Spectrum
Cage, E., Bird, G., & Pellicano, E. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2923-1 · Cited by 24
The neural signatures of egocentric bias in normative decision-making
Feng, C., Feng, X., Wang, L., Wang, L., Gu, R., Ni, A., Deshpande, G., Li, Z., & Luo, Y. (2018) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-018-9893-1 · Cited by 21
Dickinson, D. L., & David Masclet, B. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.023 · Cited by 24
Reciprocity in Ranked Relationships: Does Social Structure Influence Social Reasoning?
Fiddick, L., & Cummins, D. D. (2001) · Journal of Bioeconomics · doi:10.1023/a:1020572212265 · Cited by 21
A Theory of Status-Mediated Inequity Aversion
Tutić, A., & Liebe, U. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/00222500902799601 · Cited by 21
Strategic buyers, horizontal mergers and synergies: An experimental investigation
Davis, D. D., & Wilson, B. J. (2007) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.12.004 · Cited by 21
Experiments and Ethnography: Combining Methods for Better Understanding of Behavior and Change
LESOROGOL, C. K. (2005) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/427099 · Cited by 23
Getting policy-makers to listen to field experiments
Dolan, P., & Galizzi, M. M. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru035 · Cited by 22
A Bargaining Experiment to Motivate Discussion on Fairness
Dickinson, D. L. (2002) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220480209596463 · Cited by 21
The Role of Personal Involvement and Responsibility in Unfair Outcomes
Brañas‐Garza, P., Durán, M. A., & Espinosa, M. P. (2009) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463109103900 · Cited by 21
Smith, V. L. S. (2008) · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2122-1 · Cited by 21
Self-citationExperimental Tests of Core Theory and the Coase Theorem: Inefficiency and Cycling
Aivazian, V. A., Callen, J. L., & McCracken, S. A. (2009) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/596562 · Cited by 20
Unequal opportunities and distributive justice
Eisenkopf, G., Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.011 · Cited by 20
For Love or Reward? Characterising Preferences for Giving to Parents in an Experimental Setting
Porter, M., & Adams‐Prassl, A. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12248 · Cited by 17
When foul play seems fair: Exploring the link between just deserts and honesty
Galeotti, F., Kline, R., & Orsini, R. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.007 · Cited by 20
Donors change both their level and pattern of giving in response to contests among charities
DECK, C. A., & Murphy, J. J. (2018) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.12.004 · Cited by 20
The unexpected power of positivity: Predictions versus decisions about advisor selection.
Hur, J. D., Ruttan, R. L., & Shea, C. T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000756 · Cited by 22
Baranski, A. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-018-9591-2 · Cited by 21
Rodrigues, J., & Hewig, J. S. (2026) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e44831 · Cited by 26
Alós‐Ferrer, C., García-Segarra, J., & Ritschel, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.08.002 · Cited by 20
Leveling the playing field: Dishonesty in the face of threat
Atanasov, P. D., & Dana, J. D. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.07.006 · Cited by 20
La négociation : les enseignements du jeu du dictateur
Petit, E., & Rouillon, S. (2011) · Négociations · doi:10.3917/neg.014.0071 · Cited by 19
Reaching the Individual: EU Accession, NGOs, and Human Rights
Bracic, A. (2016) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541600023x · Cited by 19
Option to cooperate increases women's competitiveness and closes the gender gap
Cassar, A., & Rigdon, M. (2021) · Evolution and human behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.06.001 · Cited by 18
Bargaining and Search: An Experimental Study
Zwick, R., & Lee, C. C. (1999) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1008616514620 · Cited by 20
Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
Stahl, D. O., & Haruvy, E. E. (2007) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.08.003 · Cited by 20
Moral Distance and Moral Motivations in Dictator GamesPreprint
Aguiar, F., Brañas‐Garza, P., & Miller, L. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1022028 · Cited by 20
Essays on Social Preferences and Beliefs in Non-Embedded Social Dilemmas
Aksoy, O. (2013) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 20
Tax Policy Design in the Presence of Social Preferences: Some Experimental EvidencePreprint
Ackert, L. F., Martínez-Vázquez, J., & Rider, M. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.641723 · Cited by 20
Can We Infer Social Preferences from the Lab? Evidence from the Trust GamePreprint
Baran, N. M., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1540137 · Cited by 22
Who Cooperates in Repeated Games?
Dreber, A., Drew Fudenberg, B., & Rand, D. G. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.007 · Cited by 33
Economic Harmony: An Epistemic Theory of Economic Interactions
Suleiman, R. (2017) · Games · doi:10.3390/g8010002 · Cited by 18
Hansen, N. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1812-x · Cited by 19
Konovalov, A., & Krajbich, I. M. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead055 · Cited by 25
How do additional alternatives affect individual choice under uncertainty?
Engle‐Warnick, J., Escobal, J., & Laszlo, S. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01501.x · Cited by 19
Ambiguity and Public Good Provision in Large Societies
BAILEY, R. W., Eichberger, J., & Kelsey, D. H. (2005) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2005.00242.x · Cited by 18
Do control questions influence behavior in experiments?
Roux, C., & Thöni, C. (2014) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-014-9395-y · Cited by 19
Social preferences under chronic stress
Ceccato, S., Kettner, S. E., Kudielka, B. M., Schwieren, C., & Voß, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199528 · Cited by 20
Self-serving biases in social norm compliance
Kassas, B., & Palma, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.010 · Cited by 22
Chapter 46 Reciprocity in Ultimatum and Dictator Games: An Introduction
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2008) · Handbook of experimental economics results · doi:10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00046-7 · Cited by 19
Self-citationBalancing Ambition and Gender Among Decision Makers
Larimer, C. W., Hannagan, R. J., & Smith, K. B. (2007) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716207305272 · Cited by 19
Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis
Brit Grosskopf, A., & Pearce, G. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3483 · Cited by 19
When Income Depends on Performance and Luck: The Effects of Culture and Information on Giving
Rey‐Biel, P., Sheremeta, R. M., & Uler, N. (2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0193-230620180000020006 · Cited by 20
Cooperation in Single Play, Two-Person Extensive form Games between Anonymously Matched Players
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. S. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5196-3_3 · Cited by 19
Self-citationUsing Experimental Data to Model Bargaining Behavior in Ultimatum Games
Lin, H. H., & Sunder, S. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5196-3_16 · Cited by 19
An Experimental Investigation of Why Individuals ConformPreprint
Zafar, B. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1346428 · Cited by 19
Norms Make Preferences SocialPreprint
Kimbrough, E. O., & Vostroknutov, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2267135 · Cited by 19
Social economic decision-making and psychopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gunschera, L. J., Brazil, I. A., & Driessen, J. M. A. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104966 · Cited by 20
Endogenous versus exogenous allocation of prizes in teams—Theory and experimental evidence
Sutter, M. (2005) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2005.03.001 · Cited by 16
Bruttel, L. V., & Stolley, F. (2018) · Games · doi:10.3390/g9020028 · Cited by 18
The Effect of Preceding Self-Control on Prosocial Behaviors: The Moderating Role of Awe
Li, J., Li, A., Sun, Y., Li, H., Liu, L., Zhan, Y., Fan, W., & Zhong, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00682 · Cited by 18
Carpenter, J. P., & Huet-Vaughn, E. (2019) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788110563.00030 · Cited by 29
Revisiting generosity in the dictator game: Experimental evidence from Pakistan
Umer, H. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.101503 · Cited by 17
Equality of opportunity and the acceptability of outcome inequality
Sugden, R., & Wang, M. (2020) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103597 · Cited by 18
Inequality aversion, self-interest and social connectedness
Robson, M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.029 · Cited by 18
The Cognitive and Behavioral Economics of Envy
Zizzo, D. J. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327953.003.0011 · Cited by 21
Chapter 21 Experimental Study of Law
Camerer, C. F., & Talley, E. L. (2007) · Handbook of law and economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0730(07)02021-x · Cited by 21
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
Marchetti, A., Baglio, F., Castelli, I., Griffanti, L., Nemni, R., Rossetto, F., Valle, A., Zanette, M., & Massaro, D. (2018) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294118755673 · Cited by 20
Self-Interest Through Agency: An Alternative Rationale for the Principal-Agent RelationshipPreprint
Hamman, J. R., Loewenstein, G. F., & Weber, R. A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1271921 · Cited by 17
Culture, nationality and demographics in ultimatum gamesPreprint
Botelho, A., Hirsch, M. A., & Rutström, E. E. (2000) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 18
A Theory of Injunctive NormsPreprint
Kimbrough, E. O., & Vostroknutov, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3566589 · Cited by 18
Side-Payments and the Costs of ConflictPreprint
Sheremeta, R. M., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1999090 · Cited by 18
Trust-Your-Doctor: A Simple Heuristic in Need of a Proper Social Environment
Wegwarth, O., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0003 · Cited by 20
Anderson, L. R., Freeborn, B. A., & Holt, C. A. (2010) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.577 · Cited by 17
An experimental test of strategic trade policy
Engelmann, D., & Normann, H. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.01.007 · Cited by 17
Responses to Inequity in Non-human Primates
Brosnan, S. F. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374176-9.00019-1 · Cited by 20
Why Wait to Settle? An Experimental Test of the Asymmetric-Information Hypothesis
Sullivan, S. P. (2016) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/689704 · Cited by 18
Strategic bidding and investments in final offer arbitration: Theory and experimental evidence
DECK, C. A., & Farmer, A. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.010 · Cited by 17
Theft in South Africa: An Experiment to Examine the Influence of Racial Identity and Inequality
Pecenka, C. J., & Kundhlande, G. (2013) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.754431 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review