The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It seems that proposers in the contest condition felt self-servingly entitled to a higher payoff, but responders did not view the contest as relevant to the fair division of the pie.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Offers in the contest condition were lower than in the chance condition, and the rejection rate was substantially higher.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“Experiments using the ultimatum game have shown that seemingly subtle variations in procedure that should not matter from a strictly economic point of view-for example, the mechanism that determines the roles, whether the game is framed as an offer game or a demand game, and the timing and method of eliciting an offerall have powerful effects on how people play the game (Blount, 1995;Hoffman, McC”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994
In the citing paper
“To assess the convergent validity of the ZPG, participants played the dictator game [31].”
From Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 997
Bargaining over a jointly produced pie: The effect of the production function on bargaining outcomes
Takeuchi, A., Veszteg, R. F., Kamijo, Y., et al. (2022) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2022.03.016 · Cited by 12
Gender match and negotiation: evidence from angel investment on Shark Tank
Jetter, M., & Stockley, K. (2022) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-022-02305-6 · Cited by 12
How Do Politicians Bargain? Evidence from Ultimatum Games with Legislators in Five Countries
Sheffer, L., Loewen, P. J., Walgrave, S., Bailer, S., Breunig, C., Helfer, L., Pilet, J., Varone, F., & Vliegenthart, R. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001459 · Cited by 12
The effects of social presence on cooperative trust with algorithms
Liefooghe, B., Min, E., & Aarts, H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44354-6 · Cited by 13
Headwinds, Tailwinds, and Preferences for Income Redistribution
Chavanne, D. (2018) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12477 · Cited by 11
Fair Is Fair, or Is It? Territorial Identity Triggers Influence Ultimatum Game Behavior
Cram, L., Moore, A., Olivieri, V., & Suessenbach, F. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12543 · Cited by 12
Income distribution preferences and regulatory change in social dilemmas
Johnson, L. T., Rutström, E. E., & George, J. G. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.012 · Cited by 12
Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
Azar, O. H., Lahav, Y., & Voslinsky, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00029 · Cited by 12
Recent Advances in Experimental Studies of Social Dilemma Games
Chaudhuri, A. (2016) · Games · doi:10.3390/g7010007 · Cited by 12
Equality, Participation, Transition
Franičević, V., & Uvalić, M. (2000) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230523098 · Cited by 12
Numerosity and allocation behavior: Insights using the dictator game
Shrivastava, S., Jain, G., Nayakankuppam, D., et al. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006665 · Cited by 12
Social Preferences as an Individual Difference in Offender Decision-making
Jaynes, C. M., & Loughran, T. A. (2018) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427818798684 · Cited by 14
Wood, J. K., Gurven, M., & Goldberg, L. R. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2246 · Cited by 12
Lee, C., Chen, Y., Wu, P., & Chiou, W. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12497 · Cited by 12
Assigning Intentions When Actions Are Unobservable: The Impact of Trembling in the Trust Game
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2006) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/20111893 · Cited by 11
Status motives and agent-to-agent information sharing
Bol, J. C., & Leiby, J. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09598-5 · Cited by 20
Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., & Stevens, J. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0007 · Cited by 12
Occasionally Libertarian: Experimental Evidence of Self-Serving Omission Bias
Hayashi, A. T. (2013) · The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/ews046 · Cited by 11
Male mating signaling in social dilemma Games
Jensen, N. H. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1556/jep.11.2013.3.3 · Cited by 12
Do Procedures Matter in Fairness Allocations? Experimental Evidence in Mixed Gender Pairings
Dasgupta, U. (2011) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 12
Behavioral experiments: how and what can we learn about human behavior
Santos, A. C. (2009) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501780802684278 · Cited by 12
Interpersonal relations and economics: comments from a feminist perspective
Nelson, J. A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154.013 · Cited by 14
Civai, C., & Hawes, D. R. (2016) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35923-1_2 · Cited by 13
Assigning Intentions when Actions Are Unobservable: The Impact of Trembling in the Trust Game
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2006) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00773.x · Cited by 13
Rethinking the Fairness Hypothesis: Procedural Justice in Simple Bargaining GamesPreprint
Shor, M. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1073885 · Cited by 12
Social Preferences and Public Economics: Are good laws a substitute for good citizens?Preprint
Bowles, S. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 12
Chmura, T., Engel, C., Englerth, M., & Pitz, T. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1626149 · Cited by 13
Vertical Foreclosure in Experimental MarketsPreprint
Martin, S., Normann, H., & Snyder, C. M. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.241932 · Cited by 12
Compassionate Dictators? The Effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Offers in a Dictator GamePreprint
Reb, J. M., Junjie, S., & Narayanan, J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1612888 · Cited by 12
"The Measure Ye Mete": Does Prosocial Priming Lead to Harsher Moral Judgment?
Moon, J. W., Wright, R. R., Broadbent, C. S., & Robinson, E. D. (2017) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn22.1.10 · Cited by 11
The Effect of the Irreversible Inequality on Pro-social Behaviors of People With Disabilities
Liu, S., Mou, Z., Xie, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Guo, W. B., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00012 · Cited by 11
Testing Social Preferences for an Economic “Bad”: An Artefactual Field Experiment*
Keisner, D. K., Messer, K. D., Schulze, W. D., & Zarghamee, H. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01745.x · Cited by 11
Internally Reporting Risk in Financial Services: An Empirical Analysis
Bryce, C., Chmura, T., Webb, R., Stiebale, J., & Cheevers, C. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3530-6 · Cited by 11
From the field to the lab. An experiment on the representativeness of standard laboratory subjects
Frigau, L., Medda, T., & Pelligra, V. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2018.06.003 · Cited by 10
The role of communication content and reputation in the choice of transaction partners
Brosig‐Koch, J., & Heinrich, T. (2018) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.07.004 · Cited by 11
Public Good Provision, Punishment and the Endowment Origin: Experimental Evidence
Antinyan, A., Corazzini, L., & Neururer, D. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.03.007 · Cited by 11
The Is and Ought of Sharing: The Equality Heuristic Across the Lifespan
Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Canz, T., Gigerenzer, G., & Takezawa, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0006 · Cited by 12
Promise keeping, relational closeness, and identifiability: An experimental investigation in China
Cadsby, C. B., Du, N., Song, F., et al. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.05.004 · Cited by 11
Claims and confounds in economic experiments
Zizzo, D. J. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.05.006 · Cited by 11
An experimental analysis of cooperation and productivity in the trust game
DECK, C. A. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9186-9 · Cited by 11
Experimental Investigations of Social Preferences
Woodward, J. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195189254.003.0007 · Cited by 10
Klaus Abbink, A., & Doğan, G. (2018) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.006 · Cited by 17
Exploding Offers Can Blow Up in More Than One Way
Lau, N., Bart, Y., Bearden, J. N., et al. (2014) · Decision Analysis · doi:10.1287/deca.2014.0297 · Cited by 11
Bargaining with Asymmetric Dispute Costs
Pecorino, P., & Boening, M. V. (2014) · Review of Law & Economics · doi:10.1515/rle-2013-0030 · Cited by 9
Hic sunt leones: interpersonal relations as unexplored territory in the tradition of economics
Bruni, L. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522154.011 · Cited by 11
Theoretically Robust But Empirically Invalid? An Experimental Investigation into Tax EquivalencePreprint
Kerschbamer, R., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.200209 · Cited by 11
Chavanne, D., McCabe, K., & Paganelli, M. P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1534934 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMorals and Mores? Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality from the US and JapanPreprint
Konow, J., Saijo, T., & Akai, K. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 11
Konovalov, A., & Krajbich, I. M. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3023640 · Cited by 11
Bolton, G. E., & Chen, Y. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119138341.ch6 · Cited by 11
Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right EntitlementsPreprint
Cox, J. C., & Hall, D. T. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1789010 · Cited by 11
Behaving as Expected: Public Information and Fairness NormsPreprint
Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. K. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1082264 · Cited by 12
Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W. T., & Vesterlund, L. (2008) · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2789-1 · Cited by 11
"Do As I Say, Not As I Do": Challenges in Delegating Decisions to Automated Agents
de Melo, C. M., Marsella, S., & Gratch, J. S. (2016) · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · doi:10.5555/2936924.2937063 · Cited by 10
Construing Morality at High versus Low Levels Induces Better Self-control, Leading to Moral Acts
Wu, C.-C., Wu, W., & Chiou, W. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01041 · Cited by 10
Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent
Erkut, H. (2021) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2021.10.005 · Cited by 10
Moving on up: The impact of income mobility on antisocial behaviour
Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., & Vecci, J. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103686 · Cited by 16
Engel, C., & Kurschilgen, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01237.x · Cited by 9
Anger and economic rationality
Zizzo, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501780802112841 · Cited by 11
Do We Need a New Behavioral Benchmark for BCA?
Shogren, J. F., & Thunström, L. (2016) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1017/bca.2016.9 · Cited by 10
Free Cash Flow and Takeover Threats: An Experimental Study
Oprea, R. D. (2008) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2008.tb00908.x · Cited by 10
Bayes Factors with an Application to Experimental Economics
Bolton, G. E., Mosquin, P. L., & Fong, D. Κ. H. (2003) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1026281504189 · Cited by 10
Fairness and bargaining power in threshold public goods experiments
Hsu, L. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.578 · Cited by 10
Reciprocity and Social Order: What Do Experiments Tell us About the Failure of Economic Growth?
McCabe, K. (2005) · The Review of Austrian Economics · doi:10.1007/s11138-005-3111-2 · Cited by 10
Self-citationThe Limited Power of Voting to Limit Power
Geng, H., Weiss, A. R., & Wolff, I. (2011) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01517.x · Cited by 10
Can real-effort investments inhibit the convergence of experimental markets?
Cason, T. N., Gangadharan, L., & Nikiforakis, N. (2010) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.01.004 · Cited by 10
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
A test for comparative income effects in an ultimatum bargaining experiment
Carter, J. R., & McAloon, S. A. (1996) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00880-3 · Cited by 10
What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Conley, J. P., & Smith, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2004.01.005 · Cited by 10
Make Him an Offer He Can’t Refuse: Avoiding Conflicts Through Side-PaymentsPreprint
Sheremeta, R. M., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1755613 · Cited by 10
Does Competition Affect Giving? An Experimental StudyPreprint
Duffy, J. F., & Kornienko, T. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.762544 · Cited by 10
How Low Can You Go? Charity Reporting When Donations Signal Income and GenerosityPreprint
Bracha, A., & Lise Vesterlund, C. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Contracting under Incomplete Information and Social Preferences: An Experimental StudyPreprint
Hoppe, E. I., & Schmitz, P. W. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2192451 · Cited by 10
Other-Regarding Preferences: Egalitarian Warm Glow, Empathy, and Group SizePreprint
Stahl, D. O., & Haruvy, E. E. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.410925 · Cited by 10
Illik, P. (2009) · REAL-PhD (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 8
Barclay, P. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych233 · Cited by 10
Well-to-do or Doing Well? Empirical studies of wellbeing and development
Blauw, S. L. (2011) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 10
Buying used products for remanufacturing: negotiating or posted pricing
Gönsch, J. (2014) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-014-0729-1 · Cited by 9
It’s not you (well, it is a bit you), it’s me: Self- versus social image in warm-glow giving
Grossman, P. J., & Levy, J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300868 · Cited by 11
Renegotiations in the Presence of Supply Disruptions
Katok, E., & Tan, L. (2024) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478241283043 · Cited by 9
Transparency, asymmetric information and cooperation
Lotito, G., Migheli, M., & Ortona, G. (2020) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-020-09669-z · Cited by 11
Designing an incentive mechanism for information security policy compliance: An experiment
Li, Y. J., & Hoffman, E. N. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.033 · Cited by 9
Self-citationVirtual world order: the economics and organizations of virtual pirates
Mildenberger, C. D. (2015) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-015-0284-5 · Cited by 9
The evolution and development of human cooperation
Amici, F. (2015) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.16.3.03ami · Cited by 11
Effects of a chance task outcome on the offers in the ultimatum game: The mediation role of emotions
Matarazzo, O., Pizzini, B., Greco, C., & Carpentieri, M. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications · doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2016.7804564 · Cited by 10
Market Interaction and Pro‐Social Behavior: An Experimental Study
Collins, S. M., Hamman, J., & Lightle, J. P. (2017) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12238 · Cited by 10
Smith, V. L. S. (2020) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/kykl.12246 · Cited by 10
Self-citationSimple Heuristics in a Social Game
Hertwig, R., Fischbacher, U., & Bruhin, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0002 · Cited by 12
Altruistische Reziprozität. Theoretische Überlegungen und experimentelle Evidenz
Berger, R. D. (2013) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-013-0192-y · Cited by 10
Endogenous Property Rights in a Hold‐up Experiment
Erlei, M., & Siemer, J. P. (2013) · Metroeconomica · doi:10.1111/meca.12037 · Cited by 9
Moral norms in a partly compliant society
Kranz, S. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.07.007 · Cited by 9
An Experimental Investigation of Trust and Sequential Trade
DECK, C. A. (2010) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.993 · Cited by 8
Ross, C. T. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.014 · Cited by 9
Remembering Friends as Not So Friendly in Competitive and Bargaining Social Interactions
Danziger, S., Disatnik, D. J., & Shani, Y. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2019 · Cited by 9
Smith, V. L. S. (2017) · Journal of Bioeconomics · doi:10.1007/s10818-017-9256-9 · Cited by 9
Self-citationFairness in Bankruptcies: An Experimental Study
Cappelen, A. W., Luttens, R. I., Sørensen, E. Ø., et al. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3029 · Cited by 9
Norms, cognitive dissonance, and cooperative behaviour in laboratory experiments
Wichardt, P. C. (2012) · International Journal of Social Economics · doi:10.1108/03068291211214208 · Cited by 9
Ogawa, K., Takemoto, T., Takahashi, H., & Suzuki, A. (2012) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.08.008 · Cited by 9
Fairness and Inequity Aversion
Tricomi, E. M., & Sullivan‐Toole, H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00142-1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-380
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010008813
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 113
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- ultimatum game, dictator game, fairness, self-regarding preferences, first-mover advantage, property rights, anonymity, double-blind experiment, expectations, knowledge quiz
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
