The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We validated this finding using both self-reported and behavioral measures for engagement (e.g., survey responses and chat log analysis) and trust (e.g., survey questions and incentivized Trust Game [35]).”
From Humanlike AI Design Increases Anthropomorphism but Yields Divergent Outcomes on Engagement and Trust Globally (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Adherence to, or violation of, social norms has mainly been studied in the context of three economic games: the public goods game [96], the trust game [16], and the dictator game [80].”
From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Bilateral trust-or gift exchange games (Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995; Fehr and Falk 1999) indicate that many subjects are conditionally cooperative, i.e., they are willing to cooperate to some extent if others cooperate, too.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995
In the citing paper
“We conjecture that, in addition to purely selfish subjects, there is a nonnegligible number of subjects who are (i) conditionally cooperative and (ii) willing to engage in the costly punishment of free riders.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995
In the citing paper
“A healthy economy is sustained by trust among economic actors1–3.”
From Deep reinforcement learning can promote sustainable human behaviour in a common-pool resource problem (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Second, we know from the previous literature that sex-specific gonadal steroids influence OT-receptor binding in the brain, and that intranasal oxytocin can affect the behavior of males and females differently, even in opposite directions 40 .”
From A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–112 of 112
The Betrayal Aversion Elicitation Task: An Individual Level Betrayal Aversion Measure
Aimone, J., Ball, S., & King-Casas, B. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137491 · Cited by 28
Should I trust you? Learning and memory of social interactions in dementia
Wong, S., Irish, M., O’Callaghan, C., Kumfor, F., Savage, G., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Hornberger, M. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.016 · Cited by 28
The Influence of a Robot's Embodiment on Trust: A Longitudinal Study
van Maris, A., Lehmann, H., Natale, L., & Grzyb, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3029798.3038435 · Cited by 24
Oxytocin, trust, and trustworthiness: the moderating role of music
Riedl, R., Javor, A., Gefen, D., Felten, A., & Reuter, M. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics · doi:10.1037/npe0000070 · Cited by 15
Koster, R., Pîslar, M., Tacchetti, A., Balaguer, J., Liu, L., Elie, R., Hauser, O. P., Tuyls, K., Botvinick, M., & Summerfield, C. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58043-7 · Cited by 12
Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of trust games with asymmetric parameters
Lim, I. S. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062419 · Cited by 12
A study of dynamic information display and decision-making in abstract trust games
Schaffer, J., O’Donovan, J., Marusich, L., Yu, M., Gonzalez, C., & Höllerer, T. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.002 · Cited by 10
Conditional reciprocity in the investment game
Ahmed, A. (2011) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.11.005 · Cited by 6
Liu, W., Shah, N., Ma, I., & Rosenblau, G. (2024) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13463 · Cited by 6
Effects of parity, sympathy and reciprocity in increasing social welfare
Sen, S., Crawford, C., Dees, A., Nanda Kumar, R., & Hale, J. (2020) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888920000120 · Cited by 3
Schimmelpfennig, R., Díaz, M., Prabhakaran, V., & Davani, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.17898 · Cited by 2
“Participants engaged in a modified, one-shot Trust Game [35] to measure their trust in the AI system.”
Chen, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.14923 · Cited by 2
“We use trust in the operational sense of experimental economics: revealed by a costly choice, not a questionnaire [4].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-142
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045633722
- Cited by
- 5,548
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 178 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 326 · 2022: 275 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 314 · 2019: 269 · 2018: 298 · 2017: 260 · 2016: 250 · 2015: 282 · 2014: 239 · 2013: 264 · 2012: 242
- FWCI
- 37.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- trust, reciprocity, social history, trust game, reputation effects, precommitment, interpersonal relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
