The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We validated this finding using both self-reported and behavioral measures for engagement (e.g., survey responses and chat log analysis) and trust (e.g., survey questions and incentivized Trust Game [35]).”
From Humanlike AI Design Increases Anthropomorphism but Yields Divergent Outcomes on Engagement and Trust Globally (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Adherence to, or violation of, social norms has mainly been studied in the context of three economic games: the public goods game [96], the trust game [16], and the dictator game [80].”
From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Bilateral trust-or gift exchange games (Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995; Fehr and Falk 1999) indicate that many subjects are conditionally cooperative, i.e., they are willing to cooperate to some extent if others cooperate, too.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995
In the citing paper
“We conjecture that, in addition to purely selfish subjects, there is a nonnegligible number of subjects who are (i) conditionally cooperative and (ii) willing to engage in the costly punishment of free riders.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe 1995
In the citing paper
“A healthy economy is sustained by trust among economic actors1–3.”
From Deep reinforcement learning can promote sustainable human behaviour in a common-pool resource problem (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Second, we know from the previous literature that sex-specific gonadal steroids influence OT-receptor binding in the brain, and that intranasal oxytocin can affect the behavior of males and females differently, even in opposite directions 40 .”
From A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,547
Collective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195
Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475
Evolution of indirect reciprocity
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04131 · Cited by 2,762
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001 · Cited by 2,416
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04271 · Cited by 1,726
Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature
Chaudhuri, A. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1 · Cited by 1,445
Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0028756 · Cited by 1,397
Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
RIEDL, A., & SMEETS, P. (2017) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12547 · Cited by 1,378
Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1108062 · Cited by 1,345
Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb
Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013 · Cited by 1,295
Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans
Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009 · Cited by 1,258
Psychological foundations of incentives
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00208-2 · Cited by 1,240
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis
Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037737 · Cited by 1,126
The origin and evolution of religious prosociality
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158757 · Cited by 874
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences
Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 · Cited by 779
Beldad, A., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013 · Cited by 754
Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game
Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1575 · Cited by 729
On The Economics and Biology of Trust
Fehr, E. (2009) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.235 · Cited by 680
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. (2003) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00003-9 · Cited by 659
Self-citationOxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness
ZAK, P., KURZBAN, R., & MATZNER, W. (2005) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.009 · Cited by 595
Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology
Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27749365 · Cited by 578
The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001 · Cited by 508
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.294 · Cited by 481
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2012) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.009 · Cited by 455
Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley
Mathur, M. B., & Reichling, D. B. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.008 · Cited by 439
Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.256 · Cited by 431
Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI
Klingbeil, A., Grützner, C., & Schreck, P. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352 · Cited by 450
Burnett, S., Sebastian, C., Cohen Kadosh, K., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.011 · Cited by 391
Little Emperors: Behavioral Impacts of China's One-Child Policy
Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230221 · Cited by 392
More order with less law: On contract enforcement, trust and crowding
Bohnet, I., Frey, B. S., & Huck, S. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000211 · Cited by 391
Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality
Falk, A., & Hermle, J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9899 · Cited by 378
Religion and trust: An experimental study
Tan, J. H. W., & Vogel, C. (2008) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.03.002 · Cited by 342
Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment
Seinen, I., & Schram, A. (2006) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.10.005 · Cited by 350
Genetics of Human Social Behavior
Ebstein, R. P., Israel, S., Chew, S. H., Zhong, S., & Knafo, A. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.020 · Cited by 323
Does Oxytocin Increase Trust in Humans? A Critical Review of Research
Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615600138 · Cited by 316
Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience
Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211009995 · Cited by 301
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2000) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.203115 · Cited by 293
Triangulating the Neural, Psychological, and Economic Bases of Guilt Aversion
Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.056 · Cited by 260
ZAK, P. J., KURZBAN, R., & MATZNER, W. T. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1314.025 · Cited by 282
Rosenbacke, R., Melhus, Å., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2024) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/53207 · Cited by 305
A Turing Test of Whether AI Chatbots Are Behaviorally Similar to Humans
Mei, Q., Xie, Y., Yuan, W., & Jackson, M. O. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2313925121 · Cited by 254
A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior
Korndörfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133193 · Cited by 255
Singer, T., Snozzi, R., Bird, G., Petrovic, P., Silani, G., Heinrichs, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014195 · Cited by 248
The Biological and Evolutionary Logic of Human Cooperation
Burnham, T. C., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2005-0107 · Cited by 231
Changing Brains, Changing Perspectives: The Neurocognitive Development of Reciprocity
van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610391102 · Cited by 229
Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible
Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., & Luminet, O. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610377343 · Cited by 216
Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration
BROWN, H. G., POOLE, M. S., & RODGERS, T. L. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045785 · Cited by 209
Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior
Krueger, F., Parasuraman, R., Iyengar, V., Thornburg, M., Weel, J., Lin, M., Clarke, E., McCabe, K., & Lipsky, R. H. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00004 · Cited by 207
“(2010) administered the standard trust game (Berg et al., 1995), in which participants first played the role of trustor and then trustee albeit with a different anonymous partner.”
InfluentialSelf-citationEffect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations
Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2648849 · Cited by 205
Testosterone inhibits trust but promotes reciprocity
Boksem, M. A. S., Mehta, P. H., Van den Bergh, B., van Son, V., Trautmann, S. T., Roelofs, K., Smidts, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613495063 · Cited by 191
Helping People by Being in the Present: Mindfulness Increases Prosocial Behavior
Hafenbrack, A. C., Cameron, L. D., Spreitzer, G. M., Zhang, C., Noval, L. J., & Shaffakat, S. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.005 · Cited by 189
Synchronization Can Influence Trust Following Virtual Interaction
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2013) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000173 · Cited by 184
Flustered and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality.
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Keltner, D. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025403 · Cited by 167
The social context of trust: The role of status
Lount, R. B., & Pettit, N. C. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005 · Cited by 163
Is Trust Important in Technology Adoption? A Policy Capturing Approach
Bahmanziari, T., Pearson, J. M., & Crosby, L. (2003) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2003.11647533 · Cited by 162
Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762 · Cited by 158
Monetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact
MORHENN, V, PARK, J., PIPER, E., & ZAK, P. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.004 · Cited by 158
Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center
Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008137107 · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe evolution of trust and trustworthiness
Kumar, A., Capraro, V., & Perc, M. (2020) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0491 · Cited by 148
Effects of Direct Social Experience on Trust Decisions and Neural Reward Circuitry
Fareri, D. S., Chang, L. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00148 · Cited by 147
Ratner, K. G., Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J., van Knippenberg, A., & Amodio, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036498 · Cited by 144
Reward-related processing in the human brain: developmental considerations
Fareri, D. S., Martin, L. N., & Delgado, M. R. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000576 · Cited by 141
A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., Pauwels, L., Vogt, B., & Fehr, E. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0878-x · Cited by 137
The politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach
Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9181-x · Cited by 132
Lane, A., Luminet, O., Nave, G., & Mikolajczak, M. (2016) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.12384 · Cited by 129
In community we trust: Online security communication at eBay
Boyd, J. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00147.x · Cited by 132
Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence
van den Bos, W., Westenberg, M., van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2010) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.004 · Cited by 129
Reputational Priors Magnify Striatal Responses to Violations of Trust
Fouragnan, E., Chierchia, G., Greiner, S., Neveu, R., Avesani, P., & Coricelli, G. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3086-12.2013 · Cited by 128
A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction
Tian, L., & Oviatt, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3439720 · Cited by 133
Social rewards and social networks in the human brain
Fareri, D. S., & Delgado, M. R. (2014) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858414521869 · Cited by 124
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., Schmidt, P., & Singer, T. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31813-8 · Cited by 107
The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9 · Cited by 108
Trusting a Virtual Driver That Looks, Acts, and Thinks Like You
Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815580749 · Cited by 101
A Networked ${N}$ -Player Trust Game and Its Evolutionary Dynamics
Chica, M., Chiong, R., Kirley, M., & Ishibuchi, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2017.2769081 · Cited by 95
U-shaped relation between plasma oxytocin levels and behavior in the trust game
Zhong, S., Monakhov, M., Mok, H. P., Tong, T., Lai, P. S., Chew, S. H., & Ebstein, R. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051095 · Cited by 90
The Measurement of the Propensity to Trust Automation
Jessup, S. A., Schneider, T. R., Alarcon, G. M., Ryan, T. J., & Capiola, A. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21565-1_32 · Cited by 90
Trust and partner selection in social networks: An experimentally grounded model
Bravo, G., Squazzoni, F., & Boero, R. (2012) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.03.001 · Cited by 85
“Recent experimental studies have explicitly acknowledged the relevance of trust for cooperation in human societies (e.g. Barrera & Buskens 2009; Berg et al. 1995; Boero et al. 2009a,b; Camerer 2003; Keser 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialOxytocin makes females, but not males, less forgiving following betrayal of trust
Yao, S., Zhao, W., Cheng, R., Geng, Y., Luo, L., & Kendrick, K. M. (2014) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s146114571400090x · Cited by 74
Are we nice(r) to nice(r) people?—An experimental analysis
Albert, M., Güth, W., Kirchler, E., & Maciejovsky, B. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9131-3 · Cited by 69
Learning to trust: trust and attachment in early psychosis
Fett, A.-K. J., Shergill, S. S., Korver-Nieberg, N., Yakub, F., Gromann, P. M., & Krabbendam, L. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716000015 · Cited by 69
Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game
Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.352540 · Cited by 64
Bornemann, B., Kok, B. E., Böckler, A., & Singer, T. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.004 · Cited by 62
Social Preferences: Some Thoughts from the Field
List, J. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142958 · Cited by 61
Gundelach, B., & Traunmüller, R. (2014) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12064 · Cited by 58
Forster, D. E., Billingsley, J., Russell, V. M., McCauley, T. G., Smith, A., Burnette, J. L., Ohtsubo, Y., Schug, J., Lieberman, D., & McCullough, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000227 · Cited by 57
Considerations of fairness in the adolescent brain
Crone, E. A. (2013) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12022 · Cited by 48
Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.027 · Cited by 50
Trust and Reciprocity in the Investment Gamewith Indirect Reward
Güth, W., Königstein, M., Marchand, N., & Nehring, K. (2000) · Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät · doi:10.18452/3431 · Cited by 50
Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal
Klackl, J., Pfundmair, M., Agroskin, D., & Jonas, E. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.010 · Cited by 47
Subtle social cues, explicit incentives, and cooperation in social dilemmas
Boone, C., Declerck, C. H., & Suetens, S. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.005 · Cited by 43
Conditional investment strategy in evolutionary trust games with repeated group interactions
Liu, L., & Chen, X. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.073 · Cited by 45
When Do People Trust Their Social Groups?
Ma, X., Cheng, J., Iyer, S., & Naaman, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300297 · Cited by 41
Effects of update rules on networked n-player trust game dynamics
Chica, M., Chiong, R., Ramasco, J. J., & Abbass, H. (2019) · Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104870 · Cited by 39
Rehabilitation and social behavior: Experiments in prison
Balafoutas, L., García-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Jaber-Lopez, T., & Mitrokostas, E. (2020) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.10.009 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-142
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045633722
- Cited by
- 5,548
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 178 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 326 · 2022: 275 · 2021: 323 · 2020: 314 · 2019: 269 · 2018: 298 · 2017: 260 · 2016: 250 · 2015: 282 · 2014: 239 · 2013: 264 · 2012: 242
- FWCI
- 37.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Games and Economic Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- trust, reciprocity, social history, trust game, reputation effects, precommitment, interpersonal relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
