Cited by 306Reading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Working Memory Deficits of Reading Disabled Children

de Jong, Peter F.·1998·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Aims of the study were to investigate the specificity of reading disabled childrens deficits in working memory capacity and to pursue whether their deficits could be accounted for by deficient processing or impairments in verbal short-term storage capacity. A group of 10-year-old reading disabled children was compared with two groups of normal reading children, matched for chronological age and reading age, respectively. Measures for working memory capacity, short-term capacity and processing speed related to the language and to the numerical domain were administered. Results indicated that reading disabled children performed worse on all measures of working memory capacity, irrespective of the domain which these measures reflected. Their poorer performance could neither be explained by inefficient processing nor to their deficits in verbal short-term storage capacity. Reading disabled children seem to have a general lack of capacity for the concurrent processing and storage of verbal information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jecp.1998.2451

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children's abilities to store and manipulate information in short-term memory are closely associated with scholastic attainments over the school years.

    “Children Õ s abilities to store and manipulate information in short-term memory are closely associated with scholastic attainments over the school years.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, P. F.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
75-96
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160379673
Cited by
306
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
reading disorders, dyslexia, working memory, short-term memory, processing speed, children, number processing
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Reading, Time Factors, Disabled Children, Children with Disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review