Cited by 246Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Neural bases of asymmetric language switching in second-language learners: an ER-fMRI study

Open access
Wang, Yapeng, Xue, Gui, Chen, Chuansheng, Xue, Feng, Dong, Qi·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Using the ER-fMRI technique, the present study was designed to investigate the neural substrates of language switching among second-language learners. Twelve Chinese college students who were learning English were scanned when they performed language switching tasks (naming pictures in their first [L1, Chinese] and second [L2, English] languages according to response cues). Compared to non-switching conditions, language switching elicited greater activation in the right superior prefrontal cortex (BA9/10/32), left middle and superior frontal cortex (BA8/9/46), and right middle cingulum and caudate (BA11). When the direction of switching was considered, forward switching (from L1 to L2), but not backward switching (from L2 to L1), activated several brain regions related to executive functions (i.e., bilateral frontal cortices and left ACC) relative to non-switching conditions. These results suggest that neural correlates of language switching differ depending on the direction of the switch and that there does not seem to be a specific brain area acting as a "language switch".

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.054

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language switching produces a spatially distributed activation pattern that includes bilateral frontal, precentral, caudate, pre-SMA, and temporal areas.

    “language switching elicits a spatially-distributed activation pattern involving bilateral frontal regions, bilateral precentral areas, bilateral caudate, bilateral (or midline) pre-supplementary areas (pre-SMA), and bilateral temporal regions.”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Xue, G., Chen, C., Xue, F., & Dong, Q.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Dong, Qi
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
862-870
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011495234
Cited by
246
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
language switching, second language acquisition, bilingualism, Chinese-English bilinguals, executive function, anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review