Cited by 52Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsMotor Control and AdaptationRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Active Hand-Held Instrument for Enhanced Microsurgical Accuracy

Open access
Ang, Wei Tech, Riviere, Cameron N., Khosla, Pradeep K.·2000·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-40899-4_91

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bose et al. proposed an approach including active error compensation and a movable base to steady the hand.

    “The concept included active error compensation, like our approach (though no estimation algorithm was specified), and a movable base to steady the hand, somewhat resembling the steady-hand approach.”

    From Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments (2003) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Abstract describes active compensation for unwanted instrument motion. But the Introduction describes a hand-held tool that deflects its tip, not a movable base to steady the hand; it discusses the steady-hand approach as a separate design. Section 2.4 also specifies a tremor-estimation algorithm, contrary to the claim that none was specified. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The prototype manipulator can track 1-D and 3-D trajectories with rms error of 2.5 um and 11.2 um, respectively.

    “Experimental results show that the prototype is able to track 1-D and 3-D trajectories with rms error of 2.5 mand11.2 m, respectively [27].”
  • The manipulator has demonstrated higher accuracy than the present instrument prototype, and the WFLC has demonstrated higher accuracy in 1-DOF tremor canceling tests.

    “The manipulator has demonstrated higher accuracy [27], as has the WFLC in 1-DOF tremor canceling tests [14].”
  • The Bose et al. proposal seems never to have been fully implemented.

    “However, the proposal seems never to have been fully implemented.”

    From Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments (2003) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe a preliminary Micron prototype, and the Discussion says further integration and testing were planned. Our copy does not mention a Bose et al. proposal or establish whether that proposal was ever fully implemented; searches for Bose and implementation yielded no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Patkin, M.: Ergonomics applied to the practice of microsurgery. Austr. N. Z. J. Surg. 47, 239–320 (1977) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Charles, S.: Dexterity enhancement for surgery. In: Taylor, R.H., et al. (eds.) Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications, pp. 467–471. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
  3. Tang, W.M., Han, D.P.: A study of surgical approaches to retinal vascular occlusions. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118, 138–143 (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Weiss, J.N.: Treatment of central retinal vein occlusion by injection of tissue plasminogen activator into aretinal vein. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 126, 142–144 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Riviere, C.N., Rader, R.S., Khosla, P.K.: Characteristics of hand motion of eye surgeons. In: Proc. 19th Annu. Conf, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc, Chicago (1997)
  6. Harwell, R.C., Ferguson, R.L.: Physiologic tremor and microsurgery. Microsurgery 4, 187–192 (1983) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Elble, R.J., Koller, W.C.: Tremor. JohnsHopkins, Baltimore (1990)
  8. Riviere, C.N., Jensen, P.S.: A study of instrument motion in retinal microsurgery. Submitted to 21st Annu. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hunter, I.W., Doukoglou, T.D., Lafontaine, S.R., Charette, P.G., Jones, L.A., Sagar, M.A., Mallinson, G.D., Hunter, P.J.: A teleoperated microsurgical robot and associated virtual environment for eye surgery. Presence 2, 265–280 (1993) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Schenker, P.S., Barlow, E.C., Boswell, C.D., Das, H., Lee, S., Ohm, T.R., Paljug, E.D., Rodriguez, G., Charles, S.T.: Development of a telemanipulator for dexterity enhanced microsurgery. In: Proc. 2nd Intl. Symp. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg., pp. 81–88 (1995)
  11. Taylor, R., Jensen, P., Whitcomb, L., Barnes, A., Kumar, R., Stoianovici, D., Gupta, P., Wang, Z., de Juan, E., Kavoussi, L.: A steady-hand robotic system for microsurgical augmentation. In: Taylor, C., Colchester, A. (eds.) MICCAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1679, pp. 1031–1041. Springer, Heidelberg (1999) · DOI
  12. Riviere, C.N., Khosla, P.K.: Augmenting the human-machine interface: improving manual accuracy. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Robot. Autom., Albuquerque, N.M., pp. 20–25 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nechyba, M.C., Xu, Y.: Learning and transfer of human real-time control strategies. J. Adv. Computational Intell. 1(2), 137–154 (1997)
  14. Puskorius, G.V., Feldkamp, L.A.: Decoupled extended Kalman filter training of feedforward layered networks. In: Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 771–777 (1991) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lee, K.-M., Shah, D.K.: Kinematic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 4, 354–360 (1988) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Riviere, C.N., Khosla, P.K.: Microscale tracking of surgical instrument motion. In: Taylor, C., Colchester, A. (eds.) MICCAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1679, pp. 1080–1087. Springer, Heidelberg (1999) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ang, W. T., Riviere, C. N., & Khosla, P. K.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2000
Pages
878-886
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1582363951
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
inertial sensors, accelerometer, rate gyros, parallel manipulators, piezoelectric actuators, motion tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review