CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-isometric quantum error correction in gravity

Kar, Arjun·2023·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep02(2023)195
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A bstract: We construct and study an ensemble of non-isometric error correcting codes in a toy model of an evaporating black hole in two-dimensional dilaton gravity. In the preferred bases of Euclidean path integral states in the bulk and Hamiltonian eigenstates in the boundary, the encoding map is proportional to a linear transformation with independent complex Gaussian random entries of zero mean and unit variance. Using measure concentration, we show that the typical such code is very likely to preserve pairwise inner products in a set S of states that can be subexponentially large in the microcanonical Hilbert space dimension of the black hole. The size of this set also serves as an upper limit on the bulk effective field theory Hilbert space dimension. Similar techniques are used to demonstrate the existence of state-specific reconstructions of S -preserving code space unitary operators. State-specific reconstructions on subspaces exist when they are expected to by entanglement wedge reconstruction. We comment on relations to complexity theory and the breakdown of bulk effective field theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep02(2023)195

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 (Left) The disk contribution to the bulk Euclidean path integral computing the thermal partition function. The boundary has renormalized length β . Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives a state in H grav , the Hilbert space of dilaton gravity on an interval with two asymptotic boundaries. This state is the eternal two-sided black hole in AdS 2 . (Right) The boundary Euclidean path integral computing the thermal partition function. Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives the thermofield double state in two copies H B ⊗H B of the microscopic Hilbert space. In the asymptotic e -S 0 expansion of JT gravity (2.1), this path integral is computed by summing over all possible Euclidean geometries and topologies which fill in the circle. This includes the disk, the disk with a handle, and so on.
Figure 1 (Left) The disk contribution to the bulk Euclidean path integral computing the thermal partition function. The boundary has renormalized length β . Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives a state in H grav , the Hilbert space of dilaton gravity on an interval with two asymptotic boundaries. This state is the eternal two-sided black hole in AdS 2 . (Right) The boundary Euclidean path integral computing the thermal partition function. Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives the thermofield double state in two copies H B ⊗H B of the microscopic Hilbert space. In the asymptotic e -S 0 expansion of JT gravity (2.1), this path integral is computed by summing over all possible Euclidean geometries and topologies which fill in the circle. This includes the disk, the disk with a handle, and so on.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 (Left) The disk contribution to the bulk Euclidean path integral computing the one-brane (red curve) partition function. The boundary has renormalized length β . Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives a state in H br , the Hilbert space of dilaton gravity on an interval with one asymptotic boundary and one brane boundary. (Right) The boundary Euclidean path integral computing the one-brane partition function. Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives the projected thermofield double state 〈 S µ | TFD ( β ) 〉 , which we call | BR ( β ) 〉 in (2.11), in the microscopic Hilbert space H B . The red dots are brane boundary conditions.
Figure 2 (Left) The disk contribution to the bulk Euclidean path integral computing the one-brane (red curve) partition function. The boundary has renormalized length β . Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives a state in H br , the Hilbert space of dilaton gravity on an interval with one asymptotic boundary and one brane boundary. (Right) The boundary Euclidean path integral computing the one-brane partition function. Cutting the path integral along the dashed blue line gives the projected thermofield double state 〈 S µ | TFD ( β ) 〉 , which we call | BR ( β ) 〉 in (2.11), in the microscopic Hilbert space H B . The red dots are brane boundary conditions.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 106

  1. J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. J.A. Wheeler, Information, physics, quantum: The search for links, in Proceedings III International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 354–358 (1989).
  4. M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. S.W. Hawking, Black Holes and Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 191 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. C. Akers and G. Penington, Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription, JHEP 04 (2021) 062 [arXiv:2008.03319] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. S.W. Hawking, The path integral approach to quantum gravity, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp. 746–789 (1980).
  15. D. Harlow and E. Shaghoulian, Euclidean gravity and holography, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30 (2021) 2141005 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. J.L. Cardy, Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 270 (1986) 186 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. C.G. Callan and J.M. Maldacena, D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 591 [hep-th/9602043] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. A. Strominger, Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. J.M. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Black hole entropy in M theory, JHEP 12 (1997) 002 [hep-th/9711053] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. T. Hartman, C.A. Keller and B. Stoica, Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit, JHEP 09 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1405.5137] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington and E. Witten, Large N algebras and generalized entropy, arXiv:2209.10454 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  23. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  24. J. Cotler and K. Jensen, Wormholes and black hole microstates in AdS/CFT, JHEP 09 (2021) 001 [arXiv:2104.00601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. L.V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G.J. Turiaci, Black hole microstate counting from the gravitational path integral, arXiv:2209.13602 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  26. V. Balasubramanian et al., Geometric secret sharing in a model of Hawking radiation, JHEP 01 (2021) 177 [arXiv:2003.05448] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar and T. Ugajin, Entanglement between two disjoint universes, JHEP 02 (2021) 136 [arXiv:2008.05274] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar and T. Ugajin, Islands in de Sitter space, JHEP 02 (2021) 072 [arXiv:2008.05275] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar and T. Ugajin, Entanglement between two gravitating universes, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 174001 [arXiv:2104.13383] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. T. Hartman, Y. Jiang and E. Shaghoulian, Islands in cosmology, JHEP 11 (2020) 111 [arXiv:2008.01022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger, Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity, JHEP 07 (2020) 022 [arXiv:2004.13857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. L. Susskind, Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP 1 (2021) 1 [arXiv:2109.14104] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  33. E. Shaghoulian, The central dogma and cosmological horizons, JHEP 01 (2022) 132 [arXiv:2110.13210] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. E. Shaghoulian and L. Susskind, Entanglement in De Sitter space, JHEP 08 (2022) 198 [arXiv:2201.03603] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. A. Levine and E. Shaghoulian, Encoding beyond cosmological horizons in de Sitter JT gravity, arXiv:2204.08503 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  36. V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, An algebra of observables for de Sitter space, JHEP 02 (2023) 082 [arXiv:2206.10780] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney, Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 046003 [arXiv:1107.2940] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. B. Swingle, Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization, arXiv:1209.3304 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  40. M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Bit threads and holographic entanglement, Commun. Math. Phys. 352 (2017) 407 [arXiv:1604.00354] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. C. Akers and G. Penington, Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 157 [arXiv:2109.14618] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. P.W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) R2493 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the Alpha-bits of Black Holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. C. Akers et al., The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity, arXiv:2207.06536 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  47. D. Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT, PoS TASI2017 (2018) 002 [arXiv:1802.01040] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. P. Hayden et al., Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  50. S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus and A.E. Lawrence, Bulk versus boundary dynamics in anti-de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 046003 [hep-th/9805171] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [NSF-ITP-98-082] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  53. L. Susskind and E. Witten, The Holographic bound in anti-de Sitter space, hep-th/9805114 [SU-ITP-98-39] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  54. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003 [hep-th/0506118] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  56. T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, JHEP 07 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1704.05464] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Y. Chen, Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow, JHEP 03 (2020) 033 [arXiv:1912.02210] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. D.L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou, Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience, JHEP 03 (2022) 084 [arXiv:2009.04476] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. P. Gao and L. Lamprou, Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK, JHEP 06 (2022) 143 [arXiv:2111.14010] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou, On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time, arXiv:2211.16512 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  61. I. Kim, E. Tang and J. Preskill, The ghost in the radiation: Robust encodings of the black hole interior, JHEP 06 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2003.05451] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  62. V. Balasubramanian et al., Quantum Error Correction in the Black Hole Interior, arXiv:2203.01961 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  63. D.L. Jafferis, Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction, arXiv:1703.01519 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  64. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, S.F. Ross and T. Ugajin, Spin structures and baby universes, JHEP 09 (2020) 192 [arXiv:2007.04333] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  65. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  66. R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  67. I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena, Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS2 gravity, arXiv:1707.02325 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  68. S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983) 577 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  69. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  70. D. Louis-Martinez, J. Gegenberg and G. Kunstatter, Exact Dirac quantization of all 2-D dilaton gravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 321 (1994) 193 [gr-qc/9309018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  71. D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity, JHEP 02 (2020) 177 [arXiv:1804.01081] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  72. S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Emergent times in holographic duality, arXiv:2112.12156 [MIT-CTP/5382] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  73. S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality, arXiv:2110.05497 [MIT-CTP/5335] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  74. E. Witten, Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit?, arXiv:2112.11614 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  75. E. Witten, Gravity and the crossed product, JHEP 10 (2022) 008 [arXiv:2112.12828] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  76. A. Blommaert, L.V. Iliesiu and J. Kruthoff, Gravity factorized, JHEP 09 (2022) 080 [arXiv:2111.07863] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  77. A. Blommaert, L.V. Iliesiu and J. Kruthoff, Alpha states demystified — towards microscopic models of AdS2 holography, JHEP 08 (2022) 071 [arXiv:2203.07384] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  78. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  79. D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 008 [arXiv:1703.04612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  80. P. Gao, D.L. Jafferis and D.K. Kolchmeyer, An effective matrix model for dynamical end of the world branes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 01 (2022) 038 [arXiv:2104.01184] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  81. D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1475 [arXiv:1907.03363] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  82. E. Witten, Matrix Models and Deformations of JT Gravity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 476 (2020) 20200582 [arXiv:2006.13414] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  83. H. Maxfield and G.J. Turiaci, The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT gravity with defects as a matrix integral, JHEP 01 (2021) 118 [arXiv:2006.11317] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  84. B. Eynard, T. Kimura and S. Ribault, Random matrices, arXiv:1510.04430 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  85. C.V. Johnson and F. Rosso, Solving Puzzles in Deformed JT Gravity: Phase Transitions and Non-Perturbative Effects, JHEP 04 (2021) 030 [arXiv:2011.06026] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  86. A. Kar, L. Lamprou, C. Marteau and F. Rosso, A Matrix Model for Flat Space Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2208.05974 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  87. D. Stanford, More quantum noise from wormholes, arXiv:2008.08570 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  88. D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  89. A. Nema and P. Sen, A concentration of measure result for non-catalytic decoupling via approximate unitary t-designs, arXiv:2002.00247 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  90. L. Susskind, Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2018) [arXiv:1810.11563] [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45109-7] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  91. D. Petz, Sufficiency of channels over von Neumann algebras, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 39 (1988) 97 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  92. H.W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg and J. Shan, Holography for people with no time, arXiv:2207.00407 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  93. H.W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg and J. Shan, Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time, arXiv:2207.00408 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  94. A. Blommaert and M. Usatyuk, Microstructure in matrix elements, JHEP 09 (2022) 070 [arXiv:2108.02210] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  95. A. N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information, Int. J. Comput. Math. 2 (1968) 157. · DOI
  96. A. A Razborov and S. Rudich, Natural Proofs, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55 (1997) 24. · DOI
  97. N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman and A. Tajdini, Free partition functions and an averaged holographic duality, JHEP 01 (2021) 130 [arXiv:2006.04839] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  98. S. Collier and E. Perlmutter, Harnessing S-duality in $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 4 SYM & supergravity as SL(2, ℤ)-averaged strings, JHEP 08 (2022) 195 [arXiv:2201.05093] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  99. A. Blommaert and J. Kruthoff, Gravity without averaging, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 073 [arXiv:2107.02178] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  100. C.V. Johnson, The Microstate Physics of JT Gravity and Supergravity, arXiv:2201.11942 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  101. D. Harlow and J.-Q. Wu, Algebra of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 05 (2022) 097 [arXiv:2108.04841] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  102. P. Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity, arXiv:1910.10311 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  103. L.V. Iliesiu, M. Mezei and G. Sárosi, The volume of the black hole interior at late times, JHEP 07 (2022) 073 [arXiv:2107.06286] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  104. H.W. Lin, The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK, JHEP 11 (2022) 060 [arXiv:2208.07032] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  105. D.L. Jafferis, D.K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov and J. Sonner, JT gravity with matter, generalized ETH, and Random Matrices, arXiv:2209.02131 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  106. R. Bousso, Violations of the Equivalence Principle by a Nonlocally Reconstructed Vacuum at the Black Hole Horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041102 [arXiv:1308.3697] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Kar, A.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-02-20
Volume
2023
Issue
2
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep02(2023)195
Cited by
11
References
18
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review