Cited by 81Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Presence of the APOE ε4 allele modifies the relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive performance: the Maine–Syracuse Study

Open access
Dore, G. A., Elias, M. F., Robbins, M. A., Elias, P. K., Nagy, Z.·2009·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of one or more APOE epsilon4 alleles modifies the association between diabetes (defined by glucose > or =7 mmol/l or treatment) and cognitive function.Methods Diabetic status and APOE genotype interactions were assessed cross-sectionally for 826 community-dwelling, stroke-free, non-demented individuals (526 non-diabetic non-APOE epsilon4 carriers, 174 non-diabetic APOE epsilon4 carriers, 87 diabetic APOE epsilon4 non-carriers, 39 diabetic APOE epsilon4 carriers) ranging in age from 50 to 98 years. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the similarities subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and four composite scores derived from 17 additional neuropsychological tests. Multiple linear regression analyses were employed to relate diabetes and APOE genotype to cognitive performance and to examine the interaction between these two risk factors as they relate to cognitive performance. Multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors were statistically controlled.Results With adjustment for age, education, sex, race/ethnicity and APOE genotype, performance level was lower for the diabetic than for the non-diabetic group for the MMSE, the similarities subtest and each of the cognitive composites with the exception of the verbal memory composite. Interactions (p < 0.05) between diabetes and APOE genotype were found for all but the visual-spatial memory/organisation composite. The negative association between diabetes and cognitive performance was of a higher magnitude for individuals who carry one or more APOE epsilon4 alleles. Results were similar with additional adjustment for cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors.Conclusions/interpretation The presence of one or more APOE epsilon4 alleles modifies the association between diabetes and cognitive function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-009-1497-2

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced cardiac output is associated with executive dysfunction (mainly sequencing and planning difficulties) and regional WMLs adjacent to subcortical nuclei.

    “Specifically, reduced cardiac output has been associated with executive dysfunction (mainly sequencing and planning difficulties)381 and regional WMLs adjacent to the subcortical nuclei.382”

    From Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2011) · cites this paper as [381]

    The Discussion mentions white matter lesions in relation to diabetes, but does not link them to cardiac output or locate them adjacent to subcortical nuclei. Searches for reduced cardiac output and regional white matter lesions found no passage addressing that association. Citation 382 is attached to the white-matter-lesion part of the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dore, G. A., Elias, M. F., Robbins, M. A., Elias, P. K., & Nagy, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine (US)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Dore, G. A.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2009-08-20
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
2551-2560
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2002408824
Cited by
81
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-03055)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL067358, R01HL081290, HL67358, HL81290)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
APOE ε4, type 2 diabetes, cognitive performance, gene-disease interaction, Alzheimer's disease risk, cognitive decline, older adults, cardiovascular risk factors, verbal memory, visuospatial memory
MeSH terms
Aged, Alleles, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genotype, Humans, Life Style, Logic, Maine, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, New York, Psychological Tests, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Verbal Learning, Visual Perception, Patient Selection, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review