Cited by 531Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Is Type II Diabetes Associated With an Increased Risk of Cognitive Dysfunction?: A critical review of published studies

Strachan, Mark W J, Deary, Ian J, Ewing, Fiona M E, Frier, Brian M·1997·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes may be associated with impaired cognitive function. A detailed search of the literature has identified 19 controlled studies in which cognitive function in type II diabetes has been examined. The studies vary widely with respect to the nature of the diabetic populations studied and the psychological tests used. Thirteen studies demonstrated that the diabetic individuals performed more poorly in at least one aspect of cognitive function. The most commonly affected cognitive ability was verbal memory. Psychomotor ability and frontal lobe function were affected less consistently. The remaining six studies showed no differences in cognitive ability between subjects with type II diabetes and nondiabetic control subjects, but none had adequate statistical power to detect a between-group difference in cognitive ability of 0.5 of a standard deviation (a medium effect size). These findings are consistent with type II diabetes being associated with an increased risk of cognitive dysfunction. However, the widespread differences in methodology between the studies should lead to a cautious interpretation of their conclusions. The etiology of any cognitive decrement in type II diabetes is likely to result from an interaction between metabolic abnormalities intrinsic to diabetes, diabetes-specific complications, and other diabetes-related disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.20.3.438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strachan, M. W. J., Deary, I. J., Ewing, F. M. E., & Frier, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
438-445
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1967789041
Cited by
529
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cognitive impairment, verbal memory, psychomotor performance, frontal lobe function, diabetes complications, metabolic abnormalities, effect size
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review