Cited by 77Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Involvement of the endocannabinoid system in reward processing in the human brain

Open access
van Hell, Hendrika H., Jager, Gerry, Bossong, Matthijs G., Brouwer, Annelies, Jansma, J. Martijn, Zuurman, Lineke, van Gerven, Joop, Kahn, René S. +1 more·2012·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

RATIONALE: Disturbed reward processing in humans has been associated with a number of disorders, such as depression, addiction, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. The endocannabinoid (eCB) system has been implicated in reward processing in animals, but in humans, the relation between eCB functioning and reward is less clear. OBJECTIVES: The current study uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the role of the eCB system in reward processing in humans by examining the effect of the eCB agonist Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on reward-related brain activity. METHODS: Eleven healthy males participated in a randomized placebo-controlled pharmacological fMRI study with administration of THC to challenge the eCB system. We compared anticipatory and feedback-related brain activity after placebo and THC, using a monetary incentive delay task. In this task, subjects are notified before each trial whether a correct response is rewarded ("reward trial") or not ("neutral trial"). RESULTS: Subjects showed faster reaction times during reward trials compared to neutral trials, and this effect was not altered by THC. THC induced a widespread attenuation of the brain response to feedback in reward trials but not in neutral trials. Anticipatory brain activity was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a role for the eCB system in the appreciation of rewards. The involvement of the eCB system in feedback processing may be relevant for disorders in which appreciation of natural rewards may be affected such as addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-011-2428-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Hell, H. H., Jager, G., Bossong, M. G., Brouwer, A., Jansma, J. M., Zuurman, L., van Gerven, J., Kahn, R. S., & Ramsey, N. F.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Nick F.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-08-06
Volume
219
Issue
4
Pages
981-990
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2059045968
Cited by
77
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Top Institute Pharma (T5-107)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
endocannabinoid system, reward processing, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, monetary incentive delay task, feedback processing, addiction, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time, Reward, Dronabinol, Cross-Over Studies, Feedback, Physiological, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review