Cited by 41Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Ultra-Brief Mindfulness Training Reduces Alcohol Consumption in At-Risk Drinkers: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Experiment

Open access
Kamboj, Sunjeev K, Irez, Damla, Serfaty, Shirley, Thomas, Emily, Das, Ravi K, Freeman, Tom P·2017·International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Background: Like other complex psychosocial interventions, mindfulness-based treatments comprise various modality-specific components as well as nonspecific therapeutic ingredients that collectively contribute to efficacy. Consequently, the isolated effects of mindfulness strategies per se remain unclear. Methods: Using a randomized double-blind design, we compared the isolated effects of 11-minutes of "supervised" mindfulness instruction against a closely matched active control (relaxation) on subjective, physiological, and behavioral indices of maladaptive alcohol responding in drinkers at risk of harm from alcohol use (n = 68). Simple follow-up instructions on strategy use were provided, but practice was unsupervised and not formally monitored. Results: Both groups showed acute reductions in craving after training, although a trend group x time interaction (P = .056) suggested that this reduction was greater in the relaxation group (d = 0.722 P < .001) compared with the mindfulness group (d = 0.317, P = .004). Furthermore, upregulation of parasympathetic activity was found after relaxation (d = 0.562; P < .001) but not mindfulness instructions (d = 0.08; P > .1; group x time interaction: P = .009). By contrast, only the mindfulness group showed a reduction in past-week alcohol consumption at 7-day follow-up (-9.31 units, d = 0.593, P < .001), whereas no significant reduction was seen in the relaxation group (-3.00 units, d = 0.268, P > .1; group x time interaction: P = .026). Conclusion: Very brief mindfulness practice can significantly reduce alcohol consumption among at-risk drinkers, even with minimal encouragement to use this strategy outside of the experimental context. The effects on consumption may therefore represent a lower bound of efficacy of "ultra-brief" mindfulness instructions in hazardous drinkers, at least at short follow-up intervals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijnp/pyx064

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT of 68 patients with alcohol use, the mindfulness group exhibited a significant reduction in past-week alcohol consumption at the 7-day follow-up, while the relaxation group did not show a significant change.

    “The mindfulness group exhibited a significant reduction in past-week alcohol consumption at the 7-day follow-up, while the relaxation group did not show a significant change”

    From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [127]

    The Results (Acute and Longer Term Effects on Alcohol Consumption; page unavailable) confirm a significant reduction in past-week drinking at the 7-day follow-up in the mindfulness group, but not in the relaxation group. Methods (Participants; page unavailable) confirms 68 participants, but describes them as otherwise healthy heavy drinkers and says people reporting an alcohol use disorder or prior treatment seeking were excluded; calling them patients is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamboj, S. K., Irez, D., Serfaty, S., Thomas, E., Das, R. K., & Freeman, T. P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kamboj, Sunjeev K
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2017-08-02
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
936-947
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2741296037
Cited by
41
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness training, brief mindfulness intervention, alcohol consumption, at-risk drinkers, alcohol craving, relaxation training, parasympathetic activity, alcohol use disorder prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Breath Tests, Cues, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Surveys and Questionnaires, Relaxation, Mood Disorders, Young Adult, Mindfulness, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review