Cited by 99Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMultisensory perception and integrationPhonetics and Phonology Research

Perceptual systems controlling speech production

Open access
Dhanjal, Novraj S., Handunnetthi, Lahiru, Patel, Maneesh C., Wise, Richard J. S.·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

It is proposed that the acquisition and maintenance of fluent speech depend on the rapid temporal integration of motor feedforward and polysensory (auditory and somatosensory) feedback signals. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on 21 healthy right-handed, English-speaking volunteers, we investigated activity within these motor and sensory pathways and their integration during speech. Four motor conditions were studied: two speech conditions (propositional and nonpropositional speech) and two silent conditions requiring repetitive movement of the principal articulators (jaw and tongue movements). The scanning technique was adapted to minimize artifact associated with overt speech production. Our result indicates that this multimodal convergence occurs within the left and right supratemporal planes (STPs), with peaks of activity at their posteromedial extents, in regions classically considered as unimodal auditory association cortex. This cortical specialization contrasted sharply with the response of somatosensory association cortex (SII), in which activity was suppressed during speech but not during the silent repetitive movement of the principal articulators. It was also clearly distinct from the response of lateral auditory association cortex, which responded to auditory feedback alone, and from that within a left lateralized ventrolateral temporal and inferior frontal system, which served lexical- and sentence-level language retrieval. This response of cortical regions related to speech production is not predicted by the classical model of hierarchical cortical processing, providing new insights into the role of the STP in polysensory integration and into the modulation of activity in SII during normal speech production. These findings have novel implications for the acquisition and maintenance of fluent speech.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2607-08.2008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Posterior medial dorsal surface of superior temporal gyri, including planum temporale, is activated during repetitive (silent) movements of jaw and tongue as well as during auditory feedback and nonspeech vocal tract movements.

    “Fifth, the posterior medial dorsal surface of the superior temporal gyri, including the planum temporale, were found to be activated during repetitive (silent) movements of the jaw and tongue as well as during auditory feedback (Dhanjal et al., 2008) and nonspeech vocal tract movements (Loucks et al., 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregue R, Poline JB (2003) Region of interest anal- ysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in Neuroimage, Vol. 16, No. 2, abstract 497.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhanjal, N. S., Handunnetthi, L., Patel, M. C., & Wise, R. J. S.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
28
Issue
40
Pages
9969-9975
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2005513409
Cited by
99
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dunhill Medical Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
speech production, auditory feedback, somatosensory feedback, somatosensory association cortex, auditory association cortex, articulatory movements, inferior frontal cortex, language acquisition, speech fluency
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Jaw, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Speech, Speech Perception, Speech Production Measurement, Temporal Lobe, Tongue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review