Cited by 266Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Trends in intake and sources of caffeine in the diets of US adults: 2001–2010

Open access
Fulgoni, Victor L, Keast, Debra R, Lieberman, Harris R·2015·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Coffee and tea are traditional sources of caffeine in the diet, but other sources, such as energy drinks, are now available. Because risks and benefits of caffeine use are dose dependent, the public health consequences of caffeine consumption cannot be determined without data on amounts currently consumed by the US population.Objective The objective was to obtain an up-to-date, nationally representative estimate of caffeine consumption in adults.Design Dietary intake data from NHANES from 2001 to 2010 for adults ≥19 y of age were used (n = 24,808). Acute and usual intake of caffeine was estimated from all caffeine-containing foods and beverages. Trends in consumption and changes in sources of caffeine were also examined.Results Eighty-nine percent of the adult US population consumed caffeine, with equal prevalence in men and women. Usual mean ± SE per capita caffeine consumption when nonusers were included was 186 ± 4 mg/d, with men consuming more than women (211 ± 5 vs. 161 ± 3 mg/d, P < 0.05). Usual intake in consumers was 211 ± 3 mg/d, with 240 ± 4 mg/d in men and 183 ± 3 mg/d in women (P < 0.05); 46% was consumed in a single consumption event. In consumers, acute 90th and 99th percentiles of intake were 436 and 1066 mg/d, respectively. Consumption was highest in men aged 31-50 y and lowest in women aged 19-30 y. Beverages provided 98% of caffeine consumed, with coffee (∼64%), tea (∼16%), and soft drinks (∼18%) predominant sources; energy drinks provided <1%, but their consumption increased substantially from 2001 to 2010.Conclusions Although new caffeine-containing products were introduced into the US food supply, total per capita intake was stable over the period examined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.080077

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trends in caffeine consumption have been stable among adults for the past two decades.

    “Trends in caffeine consumption have been stable among adults for the past two decades (6).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [6]

  • More than 85% of adults in the U.S. regularly consume caffeine, with an average daily intake of about 180 mg/day.

    “Recent estimates in adults suggest that more than 85% of adults in the U.S. regularly consume caffeine, with an average daily intake of about 180 mg/day, about the amount of caffeine in up to two cups of coffee (6, 26).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [6]

  • Average caffeine intakes increase from about 50 mg/day in childhood (aged 2-11 years) to 180 mg/day in adulthood.

    “Average caffeine intakes increase from about 50 mg/day in childhood (aged 2–11 years) to 180 mg/day in adulthood (6).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Military Nutrition Research, Food and Nutrition Board. Caffeine for the sustainment of mental task per- formance. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
  2. [4]4. International Food Information Council Foundation. IFIC review: caf- feine and health: clarifying the controversies [Internet]. [updated 2008; cited 2012 Sep 19]. Washington (DC): International Food Information Council Foundation. Available from: http://www.foodinsight.org/Content/ 3147/Caffeine_v8-2.pdf.
  3. [13]13. Institute of Medicine. Caffeine in food and dietary supplement: ex- amining safety: workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2014.
  4. [30]30. Lieberman HR, Stavinoha T, McGraw S, White A, Hadden L, Marriott B. Caffeine intake among active duty U.S. Army soldiers. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:902-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulgoni, V. L., Keast, D. R., & Lieberman, H. R.
Affiliations
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fulgoni, Victor L
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
1081-1087
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052808640
Cited by
266
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6
FWCI
21.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command
  • Department of Defense Center Alliance for Dietary Supplement Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
caffeine consumption, dietary caffeine, coffee consumption, tea consumption, energy drinks, soft drinks, usual dietary intake, sex differences, age differences, caffeine sources, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Beverages, Caffeine, Carbonated Beverages, Coffee, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Tea, United States, Young Adult, Energy Drinks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review