Cited by 33Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and Influences

Brain morphology correlates of interindividual differences in conditioned fear acquisition and extinction learning

Winkelmann, Tobias, Grimm, Oliver, Pohlack, Sebastian T., Nees, Frauke, Cacciaglia, Raffaele, Dinu-Biringer, Ramona, Steiger, Frauke, Wicking, Manon +3 more·2016·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

The neural circuits underlying fear learning have been intensively investigated in pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms across species. These studies established a predominant role for the amygdala in fear acquisition, while the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has been shown to be important in the extinction of conditioned fear. However, studies on morphological correlates of fear learning could not consistently confirm an association with these structures. The objective of the present study was to investigate if interindividual differences in morphology of the amygdala and the vmPFC are related to differences in fear acquisition and extinction learning in humans. We performed structural magnetic resonance imaging in 68 healthy participants who underwent a differential cued fear conditioning paradigm. Volumes of subcortical structures as well as cortical thickness were computed by the semi-automated segmentation software Freesurfer. Stronger acquisition of fear as indexed by skin conductance responses was associated with larger right amygdala volume, while the degree of extinction learning was positively correlated with cortical thickness of the right vmPFC. Both findings could be conceptually replicated in an independent sample of 53 subjects. The data complement our understanding of the role of human brain morphology in the mechanisms of the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-015-1013-z

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater vmPFC thickness is associated with smaller differential SCR during early extinction learning.

    “Subsequently, Winkelman et al. [98] examined the relationship between vmPFC thickness and extinction learning, rather than recall, and found similar results. Greater vmPFC thickness was associated with smaller differential SCR during early extinction learning, suggestive of better extinction learning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkelmann, T., Grimm, O., Pohlack, S. T., Nees, F., Cacciaglia, R., Dinu-Biringer, R., Steiger, F., Wicking, M., Ruttorf, M., Schad, L. R., & Flor, H.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Flor, Herta
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2015-02-26
Volume
221
Issue
4
Pages
1927-1937
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2054571943
Cited by
33
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear conditioning, fear extinction, fear acquisition, amygdala volume, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, cortical thickness, individual differences, brain structure, skin conductance response
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review