PreprintCited by 199SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Phase 1 Assessment of the Safety and Immunogenicity of an mRNA- Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Candidate Against SARS-CoV-2 in Human Volunteers

Open access
Kremsner, Peter, Mann, Philipp, Bosch, Jacobus, Fendel, Rolf, Gabor, Julian J., Kreidenweiss, Andrea, Kroidl, Arne, Leroux-Roels, Isabel +13 more·2020·Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s00508-021-01922-y · Paper page

Abstract

There is an urgent need for vaccines to counter the COVID-19 pandemic due to infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Evidence from convalescent sera and preclinical studies has identified the viral Spike (S) protein as a key antigenic target for protective immune responses. We have applied an mRNA-based technology platform, RNActive ® , to develop CVnCoV which contains sequence optimized mRNA coding for a stabilized form of S protein encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP). Following demonstration of protective immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in animal models we performed a dose-escalation phase 1 study in healthy 18-60 year-old volunteers. This interim analysis shows that two doses of CVnCoV ranging from 2 μg to 12 μg per dose, administered 28 days apart were safe. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. There were dose-dependent increases in frequency and severity of solicited systemic adverse events, and to a lesser extent of local reactions, but the majority were mild or moderate and transient in duration. Immune responses when measured as IgG antibodies against S protein or its receptor-binding domain (RBD) by ELISA, and SARS-CoV-2-virus neutralizing antibodies measured by micro-neutralization, displayed dose-dependent increases. Median titers measured in these assays two weeks after the second 12 μg dose were comparable to the median titers observed in convalescent sera from COVID-19 patients. Seroconversion (defined as a 4-fold increase over baseline titer) of virus neutralizing antibodies two weeks after the second vaccination occurred in all participants who received 12 μg doses. Preliminary results in the subset of subjects who were enrolled with known SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity at baseline show that CVnCoV is also safe and well tolerated in this population, and is able to boost the pre-existing immune response even at low dose levels. Based on these results, the 12 μg dose is selected for further clinical investigation, including a phase 2b/3 study that will investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine CVnCoV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.11.09.20228551

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase I clinical data showed CVnCoV has acceptable tolerance and high immunogenicity.

    “Phase I clinical data showed that CVnCoV has acceptable tolerance and high immunogenicity.29,427”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

  • The favorable safety profile of the CVnCoV vaccine candidate was confirmed at up to a 12 μg dose.

    “The favorable safety profile of the CVnCoV vaccine candidate126,127 using the RNActive mRNA vaccine platform developed by CureVac128 was confirmed at up to a 12 μg dose,129”

    From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [129]

  • CVnCoV induced anti-spike IgG, anti-RBD IgG and serum-neutralization titres comparable to convalescent serum.

    “anti-spike IgG, anti-RBD IgG and serum-neutralization titres comparable to convalescent serum133”
  • CVnCoV uses lipid nanoparticles formulated using an ionizable lipid from Acuitas Therapeutics (potentially ALC-0315) and an unmodified mRNA sequence encoding a full-length spike protein with the two proline substitutions.

    “CVnCoV uses LNPs formulated using an ionizable lipid from Acuitas Therapeutics (potentially ALC-0315) and an unmodified mRNA sequence encoding a full-length spike protein with the two proline substitutions133.”
  • In phase I clinical trials, primer and booster injections of a 12 μg dose of CVnCoV administered 28 days apart generated neutralizing antibodies similar to those in plasma from patients convalescing from COVID-19 and was well tolerated.

    “In phase I clinical trials, primer and booster injections of a 12 μg dose of CVnCoV administered 28 days apart generated neutralizing antibodies similar to those in plasma from patients who were convalescing from COVID-19 and was well tolerated133.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kremsner, P., Mann, P., Bosch, J., Fendel, R., Gabor, J. J., Kreidenweiss, A., Kroidl, A., Leroux-Roels, I., Leroux-Roels, G., Schindler, C., Schunk, M., Velavan, T. P., Fotin-Mleczek, M., Müller, S., Quintini, G., Schönborn-Kellenberger, O., Vahrenhorst, D., Verstraeten, T., Walz, L., Wolz, O.-O., & Oostvogels, L.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • German Center for Infection Research (DE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Mann, Philipp
Venue
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-11-09
Volume
133
Issue
17-18
Pages
931-941
ISSN
0043-5325 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188147052
Cited by
199
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (RRCU2001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, dose escalation, reactogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, receptor binding domain, IgG, seroconversion
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19 Serotherapy, Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Immunization, Passive, Lipids, Middle Aged, RNA, Messenger, Vaccines, Nanoparticles, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review