Cited by 2,772Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

Reality mining: sensing complex social systems

Eagle, Nathan, (Sandy) Pentland, Alex·2006·Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00779-005-0046-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eagle, N., & (Sandy) Pentland, A.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Eagle, Nathan
Venue
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Published
2005-11-03
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
255-268
ISSN
  • 1617-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1617-4917
OpenAlex
W2143554828
Cited by
2,772
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 217 · 2017: 180 · 2016: 225 · 2015: 192 · 2014: 246 · 2013: 245 · 2012: 196
FWCI
234.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
reality mining, mobile devices, Bluetooth, social network inference, social patterns, access to information, user activity, context sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review