Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area

Collins, Brandon M., Miller, Jay D., Thode, Andrea E., Kelly, Maggi, van Wagtendonk, Jan W., Stephens, Scott L.·2009·Ecosystems

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-008-9211-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. Agee JK. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington, DC: Island Press
  2. Agee JK, Skinner CN. 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manage 211:83–96 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT. 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–33 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Allen CD. 2007. Interactions across spatial scales among forest dieback, fire, and erosion in northern New Mexico landscapes. Ecosystems 10:797–808 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Avery TE, Berlin GL. 1992. Fundamentals of remote sensing and airphoto interpretation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
  6. Bannari A, Huete AR, Morin D, Zagolski F. 1996. Effects of soil color and brightness on vegetation indexes. Int J Remote Sens 17:1885–906 · doi:10.1080/01431169608948745
  7. Bigler C, Kulakowski D, Veblen TT. 2005. Multiple disturbance interactions and drought influence fire severity in rocky mountain subalpine forests. Ecology 86:3018–29 · DOI
  8. Bradshaw LS, Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD. 1984. The 1978 National Fire Danger Rating System: technical documentation. General Technical Report INT-169. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain and Range Experiment Station · DOI · Paper page
  9. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  10. Brown PM, Kaufmann MR, Shepperd WD. 1999. Long-term, landscape patterns of past fire events in a montane ponderosa pine forest of central Colorado. Landsc Ecol 14:513–32 · DOI
  11. Brown PM, Wu R. 2005. Climate and disturbance forcing of episodic tree recruitment in a southwestern ponderosa pine landscape. Ecology 86:3030–8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chandler G, Markham BL. 2003. Revised Landsat 5 TM radiometric calibration procedures, and post calibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:2674–7 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chuvieco E, Riano D, Danson FM, Martin P. 2006. Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity. J Geophys Res 111:15 · doi:10.1029/2005jg000143
  14. Cohen WB, Fiorella M, Gray J, Helmer E, Anderson K. 1998. An efficient and accurate method for mapping forest clearcuts in the Pacific Northwest using Landsat imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64:293–300
  15. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Alig RJ, Oetter DR, Maiersperger TK, Fiorella M. 2002. Characterizing 23 years (1972–95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery. Ecosystems 5:122–37 · DOI
  16. Collins BM, Omi PN, Chapman PL. 2006. Regional relationships between climate and wildfire-burned area in the Interior West, USA. Can J For Res 36:699–709 · DOI
  17. Collins BM, Stephens SL. 2007. Managing natural wildfires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Front Ecol Environ 5:523–7 · DOI
  18. Collins BM, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL. 2007. Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness area. Landsc Ecol 22:545–57 · DOI
  19. Coppin PR, Bauer ME. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Rev 13:207–34 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Crosby JS, Chandler CC. 2004. Get the most from your windspeed observation. Fire Manage Today 64:53–5
  21. Dale L, Aplet G, Wilmer B. 2005. Wildland fire use and cost containment: a Colorado case study. J For 103:314–8
  22. Das A, Battles J, van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL. 2008. Spatial elements of mortality risk in old-growth forests. Ecology 89:1744–56 · DOI
  23. De’ath G. 2002. Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology 83:1105–17
  24. DeWilde L, Chapin FS. 2006. Human impacts on the fire regime of interior Alaska: interactions among fuels, ignition sources, and fire suppression. Ecosystems 9:1342–53 · DOI
  25. Donovan GH, Brown TC. 2007. Be careful what you wish for: the legacy of Smokey Bear. Front Ecol Environ 5:73–9 · DOI
  26. Ekstrand S. 1994. Assessment of forest damage with Landsat TM: correction for varying forest stand characteristics. Remote Sens Environ 47:291–302 · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90097-3
  27. Ekstrand S. 1996. Landsat TM-based forest damage assessment: correction for topographic effects. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62:151–61
  28. Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Moore MM. 1997. Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol Appl 7:895–908 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hall RJ, Crown PH, Titus SJ. 1984. Change detection methodology for aspen defoliation with Landsat MSS digital data. Can J Remote Sens 10:135–42 · doi:10.1080/07038992.1984.10855064
  30. Hayes DJ, Sader SA. 2001. Comparison of change-detection techniques for monitoring tropical forest clearing and vegetation regrowth in a time series. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:1067–75
  31. Hessburg PF, Agee JK, Franklin JF. 2005. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modem eras. For Ecol Manage 211:117–39 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Heyerdahl EK, Brubaker LB, Agee JK. 2001. Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example from the interior west, USA. Ecology 82:660–78 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Horan JJ, Schwartz DS, Love JD. 1974. Partial performance degradation of a remote sensor in a space environment, and some probably causes. Appl Optics 13:1230–7. · doi:10.1364/ao.13.001230
  34. Ingalsbee T. 2001. Wildland fire use in roadless areas: restoring ecosystems and rewilding landscapes. Fire Manage Today 61:29–32
  35. Jensen JR. 1996. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
  36. Kasischke ES, French NHF, Harrell P, Christensen NL, Ustin SL, Barry D. 1993. Monitoring of wildfires in Boreal forests using large-area AVHRR NDVI composite image data. Remote Sens Environ 45:61–71 · DOI
  37. Kitzberger T, Brown PM, Heyerdahl EK, Swetnam TW, Veblen TT. 2007. Contingent Pacific-Atlantic Ocean influence on multicentury wildfire synchrony over western North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:543–8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Kokaly RF, Rockwell BW, Haire SL, King TVV. 2007. Characterization of post-fire surface cover, soils, and bum severity at the Cerro Grande Fire, New Mexico, using hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 106:305–25 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Korhonen L, Korhonen KT, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P. 2006. Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fenn 40:577–88 · DOI
  40. Kowalik WS, Lyon RJP, Switzer P. 1983. The effects of additive radiance terms on ratios of Landsat data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 49:659–69
  41. Lopez Garcia MJ, Caselles V. 1991. Mapping burns and natural reforestation using Thematic Mapper data. Geocarto Int 1:31–7 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Markham BL, Barker JL. 1986. Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures. Greenbelt, MD: NASA/CSFC. p 3–8
  43. McCabe GJ, Palecki MA, Betancourt JL. 2004. Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4136–41 · DOI · Paper page
  44. McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P. 2004. Climate change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18:890–902 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–51 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Miller JD, Yool SR. 2002. Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data. Remote Sens Environ 82:481–96 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Miller JD, Thode AE. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens Environ 109:66–80 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE. 2008. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems. doi: 10.1007/s10021-008-9201-9 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Morgan P, Hardy CC, Swetnam TW, Rollins MG, Long DG. 2001. Mapping fire regimes across time and space: understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. Int J Wildland Fire 10:329–42 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Moritz MA, Stephens SL. 2008. Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate. Climatic Change (Suppl. 1):S265–S271 · DOI
  51. Nelson RF. 1985. Sensor-induced temporal variability of Landsat MSS data. Remote Sens Environ 18:35–48.
  52. Ott RL, Longnecker M. 2001. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, 5th edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury, Thomson Learning
  53. Parsons DJ, Debenedetti SH. 1979. Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest. For Ecol Manage 2:21–33 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Parsons DJ, Graber DM, Agee JK, van Wagtendonk JW. 1986. Natural fire management in national parks. Environ Manage 10:21–4 · DOI
  55. Pierce JL, Meyer GA, Jull AJT. 2004. Fire-induced erosion and millennial scale climate change in northern ponderosa pine forests. Nature 432:87–90 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Rollins MG, Morgan P, Swetnam T. 2002. Landscape-scale controls over 20th century fire occurrence in two large Rocky Mountain (USA) wilderness areas. Landsc Ecol 17:539–57 · doi:10.1023/a:1021584519109
  57. Safford HD, Miller JD, Schmidt D, Roath B, Parsons A. 2008. BAER soil burn severity maps do not measure fire effects to vegetation: a comment on Odion and Hanson (2006). Ecosystems. doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9094-z · DOI
  58. Salvador R, Valeriano J, Pons X, Diaz-Delgado R. 2000. A semi-automatic methodology to detect fire scars in shrubs and evergreen forests with Landsat MSS time series. Int J Remote Sens 21:655–71 · DOI
  59. Sexton T. 2006. Forest Service Wildland Fire Use program is expanding. Fire Manage Today 66:5–6
  60. Simard AJ, Haines DA, Main WA. 1985. Relations between El Niño/Southern Oscillation anomalies and wildland fire activity in the United States. Agric For Meteorol 36:93–104 · DOI
  61. Singh A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 10:989–1003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Stephens SL. 2004. Fuel loads, snag abundance, and snag recruitment in an unmanaged Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest in Northwestern Mexico. For Ecol Manage 199:103–13 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Stephens SL, Gill SJ. 2005. Forest structure and mortality in an old-growth Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest in north-western Mexico. For Ecol Manage 205:15–28 · DOI
  64. Stephens SL, Martin RE, Clinton ND. 2007. Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s forests, woodlands, shrublands and grasslands. For Ecol Manage 251:205–16 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Ediminster C, Fiedler CE, Hasse S, Harrington M, Keeley JE, McIver JD, Metlen K, Skinner CN, Youngblood A. 2008. Fire and fire surrogate treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire behavior and severity from six western United States coniferous forests. Ecol Appl (in press) · DOI · Paper page
  66. Stephenson NL. 1999. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecol Appl 9:1253–65 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Steven MD, Malthus TJ, Baret F, Xu H, Chopping MJ. 2003. Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. Remote Sens Environ 88:412–22 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010
  68. Strahler AH. 1981. Stratification of natural vegetation for forest and rangeland inventory using Landsat digital imagery and collateral data. Int J Remote Sens 2:15–41 · doi:10.1080/01431168108948338
  69. Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaufman J, Thode AE. 2006. Fire in California’s ecosystems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press · DOI · Paper page
  70. Teillet PM, Staenz K, Williams DJ. 1997. Effects of spectral, spatial, and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions. Remote Sens Environ 61:139–49 · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00248-9
  71. Thode AE. 2005. Quantifying the fire regime attributes of severity and spatial complexity using field and imagery data. PhD dissertation. University of California, Davis
  72. van Wagtendonk JW. 1986. The role of fire in the Yosemite Wilderness. Proceedings of the National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. p 2–9
  73. van Wagtendonk JW. 2004. Fire and landscapes: patterns and processes. Sierra Nevada Science Symposium: Science for Management and Conservation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Kings Beach, CA, USA. PSW-GTR-193. General Technical Report. p 69–78
  74. Westerling AL, Swetnam TW. 2003. Interannual to decadal drought and wildfire in the western United States. Eos 84:545–60 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Wilson EH, Sader SA. 2002. Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sens Environ 80:385–96 · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00318-2
  76. Wright CS, Agee JK. 2004. Fire and vegetation history in the eastern Cascade Mountains, Washington. Ecol Appl 14:443–59 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Yuan D, Elvidge CD. 1996. Comparison of relative radiometric normalization techniques. J Photogramm Remote Sens 51:117–26 · doi:10.1016/0924-2716(96)00018-4

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Collins, B. M., Miller, J. D., Thode, A. E., Kelly, M., van Wagtendonk, J. W., & Stephens, S. L.
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2008-11-04
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
114-128
ISSN
  • 1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0629
OpenAlex
W2050512983
Cited by
296
References
10
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10021-008-9211-7
The paper
Collins, B. M., Miller, J. D., Thode, A. E., Kelly, M., van Wagtendonk, J. W., & Stephens, S. L. (2009). Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9211-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.