Cited by 49Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Evidence of means–end behavior in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)

Open access
Irie-Sugimoto, Naoko, Kobayashi, Tessei, Sato, Takao, Hasegawa, Toshikazu·2008·Animal Cognition

Abstract

The present study explores to what extent Asian elephants show "means-end" behavior. We used captive Asian elephants (N = 2) to conduct four variations of the Piagetian "support" problem, which involves a goal object that is out of reach, but rests on a support within reach. In the first condition, elephants were simultaneously presented with two identical trays serving as the "support", with the bait on one tray and the other tray left empty. In the next two conditions, the bait was placed on one tray, while additional bait was placed beside the other tray. In the last condition, both trays contained bait, but one of the trays had a small gap which prevented the elephants from reaching the reward. Subjects were required to choose and pull either tray with their trunk and to obtain the bait (i.e. goal). Results showed that one elephant performed all of the support problems significantly above chance after several sessions, suggesting that the elephant was capable of understanding that pulling the tray was the "means" for achieving the "end" of obtaining the bait. This study showed that elephants show means-end behavior when subjected to a Piagetian "support" task, and indicates that such goal-directed behavior occurs in species other than primates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-007-0126-z

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In captivity, both Asian and African savanna elephants show a potential means-end understanding for the use of a tray when attempting to obtain out of reach food items; when presented with a choice of a tray with food on it (but out of reach) and a tray with food next to it, they chose to pull the tray with food on it more often, to successfully obtain the food.

    “In captivity, both Asian and African savanna elephants show a potential means-end understanding for the use of a tray when attempting to obtain out of reach food items; when presented with a choice of a tray with food on it (but out of reach) and a tray with food next to it, they chose to pull the tray with food on it more often, to successfully obtain the food (Highfill et al., 2016, 2018; IrieS”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irie-Sugimoto, N., Kobayashi, T., Sato, T., & Hasegawa, T.
Affiliations
  • NTT (Japan) (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2007-12-18
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
359-365
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W2131573123
Cited by
48
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Asian elephant, goal-directed behavior, tool use
MeSH terms
Animals, Concept Formation, Elephants, Female, Goals, Problem Solving, Comprehension, Tool Use Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review