Cited by 129Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The exploration of meditation in the neuroscience of attention and consciousness

Open access
Raffone, Antonino, Srinivasan, Narayanan·2010·Cognitive Processing

Abstract

Many recent behavioral and neuroscientific studies have revealed the importance of investigating meditation states and traits to achieve an increased understanding of cognitive and affective neuroplasticity, attention and self-awareness, as well as for their increasingly recognized clinical relevance. The investigation of states and traits related to meditation has especially pronounced implications for the neuroscience of attention, consciousness, self-awareness, empathy and theory of mind. In this article we present the main features of meditation-based mental training and characterize the current scientific approach to meditation states and traits with special reference to attention and consciousness, in light of the articles contributed to this issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10339-009-0354-z

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sumedho A (2004) Intuitive awareness. Amaravati Buddhist Monastery, Hemel Hempstead
  2. Wallace A (1999) The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: methods for refining and examining consciousness. J Conscious Stud 6:175–187

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
  • University of Allahabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Raffone, Antonino
Venue
Cognitive Processing
Published
2009-12-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1612-4782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-4790
OpenAlex
W2129433190
Cited by
129
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
meditation, attention, consciousness, self-awareness, neuroplasticity, mental training, empathy, theory of mind
MeSH terms
Attention, Consciousness, Humans, Neurosciences, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review