Cited by 369Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsEmployee Performance and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Authentic Leadership: An Empirical Test of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Mechanisms

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-011-1042-3

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Borrill, C. A., & West, M. A. (2000). How Good Is Your Team? A Guide for Team Members. Birmingham: Aston Centre of Health Service Organisation Research (ACHSOR), University of Aston.
  2. Felfe, J., Six, B., & Schmook, R. (2002). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von affektivem, kalkulatorischem und normativem Commitment gegenüber der Organisation, dem Beruf/der Tätigkeit und der Beschäftigungsform (COBB). In A. Glöckner-Rist (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente (Version 7.00). Zentrum für Umfragen. Mannheim: Methoden und Analysen.
  3. Neuberger, O., & Allerbeck, M. (1978). Arbeitsbeschreibungsbogen [ABB]. Huber: Bern.
  4. von Collani, G., & Blank, H. (2003). Persönlichkeitsmerkmale, soziale Überzeugungen und politische Parteienpräferenzen: Eine Internetbefragung zur Bundestagswahl 2002. Zeitschrift fuer Politische Psychologie, 11(4), 307–324.
  5. Wever, K. S. (1995b). Negotiating competitiveness: Employment relations and organizational innovation in Germany and the United States. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 369

Metadata

Authors
Peus, C., Wesche, J. S., Streicher, B., Braun, S., & Frey, D.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Peus, Claudia
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2011-10-12
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
331-348
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2026312468
Cited by
368
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
authentic leadership, self-consistency, trust, organizational commitment, supervisor satisfaction, leadership integrity, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review