Cited by 25Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCounseling Practices and Supervision

Girls (and boys) just want to have fun: A mixed-methods examination of the role of gender in youth mentoring relationship duration and quality

Spencer, Renée, Drew, Alison L., Walsh, Jill, Kanchewa, Stella S.·2018·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

This prospective, mixed-methods study examined the role of gender in youth mentoring relationship duration and quality. Participants were 67 gender-matched pairs of adult mentors and youth participating in community-based mentoring programs as well as the youths' guardians. Mentors and youth completed surveys and qualitative interviews at multiple time points. At baseline, male youth reported stronger relationships with their guardians. Analysis of the survey data from the 3-month follow-up revealed that male mentors and youth reported stronger mentoring relationship quality. Male matches were more likely to last at least 1 year. Further, male youth whose matches lasted at least 1 year reported better relationships with their guardians at baseline and reported stronger mentoring relationships after 3 months, compared to both females whose matches lasted greater than a year, and females whose matches lasted less than 1 year. Examinations of the qualitative interviews from a sub-sample of matched pairs (n = 29) showed that male and female youth and male mentors held similar expectations for the relationship, mainly to engage in fun activities, while female mentors were more often looking for a close relationship to develop quickly, which resulted in a disconnect between female mentees' and female mentors' expectations. Findings highlight the importance of developmentally appropriate relationships for youth and suggest that mentoring programs may be able facilitate longer, more effective matches for girls by tempering female mentors' expectations for how close and quickly those relationships will develop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-017-0494-3

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other researchers have challenged the assumption that girls generally exhibit a more favorable response to mentoring, positing that both boys and girls have similar expectations.

    “However, other researchers have challenged this assumption, positing that both boys and girls have similar expectations [154].”
  • Male mentees who reported better relationships with their parents or guardians at baseline participated in matches that lasted at least one year in BBBS America.

    “Male mentees who reported better relationships with their parents or guardians at baseline participated in matches that lasted at least one year in BBBS America [154].”
  • Male mentors reported stronger mentoring relationship quality.

    “In addition, male mentors reported stronger mentoring relationship quality [154].”
  • Early match terminations are less frequent for male than for female mentors in American programs.

    “Early match terminations are less frequent for male than for female mentors in American programs [33,113,154].”
  • Qualitative interviews in BBBS America showed that female mentors were more likely to strive for a close relationship to develop quickly, whereas male mentors expected to engage mainly in fun activities.

    “Qualitative interviews conducted in BBBS America showed that female mentors were more likely to strive for a close relationship to develop quickly, whereas male mentors expected to engage mainly in fun activities [154].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, R., Drew, A. L., Walsh, J., & Kanchewa, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Renée
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
17-35
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2769819178
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
William T. Grant Foundation (6277)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
youth mentoring, gender differences, mentoring relationship quality, parent-adolescent relationships, boys and girls
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, New England, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review