Cited by 7Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and Psychology

The Forms of Self-Criticising & Self-Reassuring Scale - Short Form for Adolescents: Psychometric Properties in Clinical and Non-Clinical Portuguese Samples

Open access
Cunha, Marina, Xavier, Ana, Salvador, Maria Céu, Castilho, Paula·2024·Child & Youth Care Forum

Abstract

Background: Self-criticism is a psychological process largely studied as a vulnerability factor for several psychological difficulties in the adult population and, to a lower extent, in adolescent samples. Thus, the availability of instruments to effectively capture this construct is important, especially for younger populations. Objective: This study examined the factor structure, measurement invariance to group samples, and psychometric properties of the short version of the Forms of Self-criticism and Self-reassuring Scale (FSCRS-SF) in Portuguese adolescents in non-clinical and clinical samples. Methods: Two non-clinical samples (N = 1224 and N = 140) and a clinical sample (N = 103) were used. Participants’ ages ranged between 12 and 18 years old for both genders. Participants voluntarily completed a set of self-report questionnaires in the classroom. 418 adolescents completed the FSCRS 6-weeks after the first administration. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the factor structure of the FSCRS-SF was similar to the one found in the adults’ version, with three factors (inadequate self, hated self, and reassured self). The measurement invariance was established for both samples. The FSCRS-SF revealed adequate to good construct validity, reliability, and temporal stability. Gender differences were found for the three subscales. Similarly, adolescents from the clinical sample reported higher levels of inadequate self and hated self and lower levels of reassured self in comparison with the non-clinical sample, as expected. Conclusions: The FSCRS-SF was revealed to be a valid and reliable measure of self-criticism and self-reassurance for adolescents and seems to be a useful tool for research and clinical purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10566-023-09765-6

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Colwell, S. R. (2016). The composite reliability calculator. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.1.4298.088. · DOI
  2. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publication Lda.
  3. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc. · DOI
  4. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance, structure analysis: Conven- tional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990 95401 · DOI
  5. Kotera, Y., Dosedlova, J., Andrzejewski, D., Kaluzeviciute, G., & Sakai, M. (2021). From stress to psy- chopathology: Relationship with self-reassurance and self-criticism in Czech University students. International journal of mental health and addiction, 20, 2321-2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11469-021-00516-z1-12. · DOI
  6. Shahar, G. (2015). Erosion: The psychopathology of self-criticism. Oxford University Press.
  7. Siegel, D. J. (2015). Brainstorm: The power and purpose of the teenage brain. Penguin. · DOI
  8. Silverman, W. K., & Albano, A. M. (1996). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Child version. Oxford University Press.
  9. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunha, M., Xavier, A., Salvador, M. C., & Castilho, P.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Superior Miguel Torga (PT)
  • Universidade Portucalense (PT)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Xavier, Ana
Venue
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2023-07-31
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
505-524
ISSN
  • 1053-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3319
OpenAlex
W4385397722
Cited by
7
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child & Youth Care Forum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universidade Portucalense Infante D. Henrique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-criticism, self-reassurance, adolescents, psychometric properties, factor structure, measurement invariance, gender differences, Portuguese adolescents, temporal stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review