Cited by 46Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesAugmented Reality Applications

A systematic review of evidence-based design and pedagogical principles in educational virtual reality environments

Oje, Adurangba Victor, Hunsu, Nathaniel J., Fiorella, Logan·2025·Educational Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100676

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oje, A. V., Hunsu, N. J., & Fiorella, L.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Oje, Adurangba Victor
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
47
Pages
100676
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407313185
Cited by
36
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 12
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
Keywords
virtual reality in education, evidence-based design, teaching principles, multimedia learning theory, generative learning, immersion, pre-training, summarization, learning effects, boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review