Cited by 117Sleep and Work-Related FatigueWorkplace Health and Well-beingCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Shift-work and cardiovascular disease: a population-based 22-year follow-up study

Open access
Hublin, Christer, Partinen, Markku, Koskenvuo, Karoliina, Silventoinen, Karri, Koskenvuo, Markku, Kaprio, Jaakko·2010·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Studies on the association between shift-work and cardiovascular disease (CVD), in particular coronary heart disease (CHD), have given conflicting results. In this prospective population-based study we assessed the association of shift-work with three endpoints: CHD mortality, disability retirement due to CVD, and incident hypertension. A cohort of 20,142 adults (the Finnish Twin Cohort) was followed from 1982 to 2003. Type of working time (daytime/nighttime/shift-work) was assessed by questionnaires in 1975 (response rate 89%) and in 1981 (84%). Causes of death, information on disability retirement and hypertension medication were obtained from nationwide official registers. Cox proportional hazard models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HR) for each endpoint by type of working time. Adjustments were made for 14 socio-demographic and lifestyle covariates. 76.9% were daytime workers and 9.5% shift-workers both in 1975 and in 1981. During the follow-up, 857 deaths due to CHD, 721 disability retirements due to CVD, and 2,642 new cases of medicated hypertension were observed. However, HRs for shift-work were not significant (mortality HR men 1.09 and women 1.22; retirement 1.15 and 0.96; hypertension 1.15 and 0.98, respectively). The results were essentially similar after full adjustments for all covariates. Within twin pairs, no association between shift work and outcome was observed. Our results do not support an association between shift-work and cardiovascular morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-010-9439-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hublin, C., Partinen, M., Koskenvuo, K., Silventoinen, K., Koskenvuo, M., & Kaprio, J.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Hublin, Christer
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2010-03-14
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
315-323
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2098774138
Cited by
117
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
shift work, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease mortality, disability retirement, hypertension, working hours, night work, twin cohort, occupational health
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Work Schedule Tolerance, Proportional Hazards Models, Twin Studies as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review