Cited by 476Technology Adoption and User BehaviourAugmented Reality ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness

Open access
Huang, Tseng-Lung, Liao, Shuling·2015·Electronic Commerce Research

Abstract

This research integrates the technology acceptance model and concepts of experiential value to investigate factors that affect sustainable relationship behavior toward using augmented-reality interactive technology (ARIT). In line with consumers’ innovativeness, this research discovers that consumers’ level of cognitive innovativeness affects their sustainable relationship behaviors toward using ARIT. Online consumers with high cognitive innovativeness put more emphasis on usefulness, aesthetics, and service excellence presented by ARIT; in contrast, those with low cognitive innovativeness focus on playfulness and ease of use presented by ARIT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Usability factors have been widely recognized as key factors to enhance the acceptance of information and communication technologies (ICT) tools; on the basis of the technology acceptance model, authors have suggested that the intention to use a product in the future is strongly correlated with its ease of use.

    “Usability factors have been widely recognized as key factors to enhance the acceptance of information and communication technologies (ICT) tools; on the basis of the technology acceptance model, authors have suggested that the intention to use a product in the future is strongly correlated with its ease of use [193,194].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Carvalho, M. L. d., Guimarães, H., Ferreira, J. B. & Freitas, A. (2012). Intention to use M-learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. In 19th International Conference on Recent Advances in Retailing and Consumer Services Science, July 9-12. Vienna, Austria.
  2. Fiore, Ann Marie, Kim, J., & Lee, H.-H. (2005). Effects of image interactivity on approach responses towards an online retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 38-53.
  3. Irani, T., & O'Malley, M. (1998). Cognitive innovativeness as a predictor of student attitudes and intent: an application of the theory of planned behavior to online learning environments. Poster presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication National Conference, Baltimore, MD.
  4. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 51-60.
  5. Sharps, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond Human-Computer interaction (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
  6. Shim, S., & Mary, F. D. (1990). Consumer intention to utilize electronic shopping. Journal of Direct Marketing, 4(3), 22-33.
  7. Venkatraman, Meera P. (1991). The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. Journal of Retailing, 67(1), 51-67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S.
Affiliations
Yuan Ze University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Tseng-Lung
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research
Published
2014-11-12
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
269-295
ISSN
  • 1389-5753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9362
OpenAlex
W2150641797
Cited by
476
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Electronic Commerce Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST103-2410-H155-022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
augmented reality, interactive technologies, technology acceptance model, experiential value, consumer innovativeness, perceived usefulness, aesthetic perception, service excellence, playfulness, ease of use, online consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review