Cited by 52Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Mind-Reading in Young Adults with ASD: Does Structure Matter?

Ponnet, Koen, Buysse, Ann, Roeyers, Herbert, De Clercq, Armand·2008·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

This study further elaborates on the mind-reading impairments of young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The hypothesis is that differences in mind-reading abilities between subjects with ASD and control subjects become more apparent when they have to infer thoughts and feelings of other persons in a less structured or more chaotic conversation, than when they have to do so in a more structured conversation. Conform to the empathic accuracy design, subjects viewed two videotaped interactions depicting two strangers and attempted to infer thoughts and feelings. One of the videotaped conversations was less structured than in the other. The results underscore the significance of structure to the mind-reading abilities of young adults with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-007-0462-5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ponnet et al. (2008) found that ASD-linked deficits in interpreting emotional expressions in actors' conversations were more pronounced when the context was naturalistic and unstructured rather than highly organized or predictable.

    “Ponnet et al. (2008) found that ASD-linked deficits in interpreting emotional expressions in actors’ conversations were more pronounced when the context was naturalistic and unstructured rather than highly organized or predictable.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Ponnet et al. (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ponnet, K., Buysse, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Ponnet, Koen
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2007-10-10
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
905-918
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1966763612
Cited by
52
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, young adults, empathic accuracy, conversation structure, social cognition, social interaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autistic Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Empathy, Humans, Male, Social Perception, Verbal Behavior, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review