Cited by 207Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The Awkward Moments Test: A Naturalistic Measure of Social Understanding in Autism

Heavey, Lisa, Phillips, Wendy, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Rutter, Michael·2000·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Details are given of a new advanced theory of mind task, developed to approximate the demands of real-life mentalizing in able individuals with autism. Excerpts of films showing characters in social situations were presented, with participants required to answer questions on characters' mental states and on control, nonsocial questions. When compared with control participants, adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome were most impaired in their ability to answer the questions requiring mind-reading ability. Although the present findings have implications for task modification, such naturalistic, dynamic stimuli are held to offer an important means of studying subtle difficulties in mentalistic understanding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005544518785

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Awkward Moments Test and MASC showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants.

    “Although both instruments showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants, the sample sizes were so small (<20 per group) that it was obviously not possible to conduct a detailed psychometric evaluation of the instruments or to assess the reliability of the its correlations with other relevant measures.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Heavey et al. 2000

  • The sample sizes in studies of the Awkward Moments Test and MASC were so small (<20 per group) that detailed psychometric evaluation or reliability assessment was not possible.

    “Although both instruments showed promise in discriminating adults with ASD from control participants, the sample sizes were so small (<20 per group) that it was obviously not possible to conduct a detailed psychometric evaluation of the instruments or to assess the reliability of the its correlations with other relevant measures.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Heavey et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heavey, L., Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Heavey, Lisa
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2000-06
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
225-236
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1587461800
Cited by
207
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
theory of mind, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, high-functioning autism, mentalization, social understanding, naturalistic stimuli
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Disorders, Psychological Tests, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review