Cited by 271Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology Research

Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being

Zhang, Jia Wei, Howell, Ryan T., Stolarski, Maciej·2013·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Future-oriented people tend to feel a little bit less happy in life than other time perspectives, but they paradoxically suffer less anxiety and depression, are more optimistic, and have both more positive and less negative affect than less future-oriented individuals.

    “In comparison, future-oriented people tend to feel a little bit less happy in life than other time perspectives, but they paradoxically suffer less anxiety and depression, are more optimistic, and have both more positive and less negative affect than less future-oriented individuals [78–81].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
Corresponding author
Howell, Ryan T.
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2012-03-24
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
169-184
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2039244909
Cited by
271
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
balanced time perspective, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, happiness, positive affect, negative affect, psychological need satisfaction, self-determination, gratitude, vitality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review