Cited by 254Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPersonality Traits and Psychology

Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits?

Zhang, Jia Wei, Howell, Ryan T.·2011·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T.
Affiliations
San Francisco State University (US)
Corresponding author
Howell, Ryan T.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
1261-1266
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076769031
Cited by
254
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
time perspective, life satisfaction, Big Five personality traits, extraversion, neuroticism, past positive time perspective, past negative time perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review