Cited by 606Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningElectronic Health Records Systems

Towards secure and privacy-preserving data sharing in e-Health systems via consortium blockchain

Zhang, Aiqing, Lin, Xiaodong·2018·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

Electronic health record sharing can help to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, where security and privacy preservation are critical issues in the systems. In recent years, blockchain has been proposed to be a promising solution to achieve personal health information (PHI) sharing with security and privacy preservation due to its advantages of immutability. This work proposes a blockchain-based secure and privacy-preserving PHI sharing (BSPP) scheme for diagnosis improvements in e-Health systems. Firstly, two kinds of blockchains, private blockchain and consortium blockchain, are constructed by devising their data structures, and consensus mechanisms. The private blockchain is responsible for storing the PHI while the consortium blockchain keeps records of the secure indexes of the PHI. In order to achieve data security, access control, privacy preservation and secure search, all the data including the PHI, keywords and the patients' identity are public key encrypted with keyword search. Furthermore, the block generators are required to provide proof of conformance for adding new blocks to the blockchains, which guarantees the system availability. Security analysis demonstrates that the proposed protocol can meet with the security goals. Furthermor, we implement the proposed scheme on JUICE to evaluate the performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-018-0995-5

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of such technologies is assisting researchers in building blockchain-based frameworks with predictive capabilities to improve medical informatics and diagnostics.

    “The use of such technologies is assisting researchers in building blockchain-based frameworks with the predictive capabilities to improve medical informatics (Lee et al., 2018) as well as diagnostics (Lee et al., 2018;Zhang & Lin, 2018).”
  • Few reviewed studies acknowledged the need for regulatory compliance or standards and goals for compliance requirements.

    “Our review suggests that few studies have acknowledged the need for regulatory compliance (Yue et al., 2016) or even the standards and goals for compliance requirements (Zhang & Lin, 2018;Al Omar et al., 2019;Li et al., 2019).”
  • Prior studies implied that certain aspects of architectural frameworks for blockchain in healthcare can affect performance efficiency.

    “Studies have implied that certain aspects of architectural frameworks developed for adoption of blockchain in healthcare can affect the performance efficiency of the proposed framework (Ji et al., 2018;Mamoshina et al., 2018;Zhang & Lin, 2018).”
  • Conventional privacy-preserving transformations often reduce utility in ways that matter clinically, especially when correlations or temporal patterns drive prediction.

    “On the other hand, conventional privacy-preserving transformations often reduce utility in ways that matter clinically, especially when correlations or temporal patterns drive prediction (Zhang and Lin, 2018; Rieke et al., 2020; Kaissis et al., 2020).”
  • Four publications proposed to use blockchain for building a personal health record system that could bridge the gap between the patient and institution-specific EHRs.

    “Four publications [25,27,28,48] proposed to use blockchain for building a personal health record system that could bridge the gap between the patient and institutionspecific EHRs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, A., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Aiqing
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2018-06-28
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
140-140
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2811112224
Cited by
606
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 5
FWCI
91.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601005)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1608085QF138, 1808085MF164)
  • Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Network and Information Security (AHNIS2018003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
electronic health records, consortium blockchain, private blockchain, privacy preservation, secure search, keyword search, access control, public-key encryption, consensus algorithms, e-health security
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Humans, Computer Security, Telemedicine, Privacy, Information Dissemination, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review