Cited by 97Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

How to Optimise Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for People with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): A Delphi Study

Open access
Spain, Debbie, Happé, Francesca·2020·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Children and adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) can benefit from cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), yet the prevailing opinion is that this requires adaptations to accommodate commonly experienced socio-communication and neuropsychological impairments. There are, however, no empirically-derived guidelines about how best to adapt standard practice. In a three round Delphi survey, we asked expert clinicians and clinical-researchers, based in England, about how to optimise the design, delivery and evaluation of CBT for people with ASD. Of 50 people approached, 18 consented to take part in Round 1, nine in Round 2 and eight in Round 3. Using a five-point scale, participants rated the degree to which 221 statements—pertaining to the referral process, assessment, engagement, formulation, goal setting, therapy structure, interventions and techniques, homework, outcome measurement, managing endings and therapist attributes—were integral to CBT. The consensus was that 155 statements represented essential or important components of CBT. Adaptations to the structure and process of therapy were consistently endorsed, and an individualised formulation-derived approach was favoured when deciding upon which interventions and techniques to offer. Further studies are needed to clarify if adapted CBT is associated with improved treatment outcomes and acceptability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-019-00335-1

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tsatsanis, K. (2014). Neuropsychological characteristics of Asperger syndrome. In F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & J. McPartland (Eds.), Asperger syndrome (pp. 71-102). New York: Guildford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spain, D., & Happé, F.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Spain, Debbie
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2019-12-14
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
184-208
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
OpenAlex
W2996582381
Cited by
97
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (CDRF–2012–03-059)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, autism spectrum disorder, treatment adaptation, expert consensus, homework, outcome measurement, treatment acceptability, children and adults with autism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review