Cited by 232Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Youth with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

Ung, Danielle, Selles, Robert, Small, Brent J., Storch, Eric A.·2015·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been developed and modified to treat anxiety symptoms in youth with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders (ASD) but has yielded varying findings. The present report is a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of CBT for anxiety among youth with ASD. A systematic search identified 14 studies involving 511 youth with high-functioning ASD. A random effects meta-analysis yielded a statistically significant pooled treatment effect size (g) estimate for CBT (g = -0.71, p < .001) with significant heterogeneity [Q (13) = 102.27, p < .001]. Removal of a study outlier yielded a statistically significant pooled treatment effect size, (g = -0.47, p < .001). Anxiety informant and treatment modality were not statistically significant moderators of treatment response. Findings suggest that CBT demonstrates robust efficacy in reducing anxiety symptoms in youth with high-functioning ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-014-0494-y

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ung, D., Selles, R., Small, B. J., & Storch, E. A.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ung, Danielle
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2014-09-23
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
533-547
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2081456881
Cited by
231
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association of Graduate Students
  • American Psychological Association
  • International OCD Foundation
  • Tourette Association of America
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, anxiety, youth, treatment efficacy, anxiety symptoms, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review