Cited by 119Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Processing Body Image on Social Media: Gender Differences in Adolescent Boys’ and Girls’ Agency and Active Coping.

Open access
Mahon, Ciara, Hevey, David·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Although scholars continue to debate the influence of social media on body image, increased social media use, especially engaging in appearance-related behaviors may be a potential risk factor for body dissatisfaction in adolescents. Little research has investigated how adolescents process appearance-related content and the potential strategies they use to protect body image perceptions on social media. To investigate coping strategies used by adolescents, four qualitative focus groups were conducted with 29 adolescents (23 girls) aged 15–16 years (M = 15.31, SD = 0.47) in mixed-gender Irish secondary schools. Thematic analysis revealed that adolescents employed many different behavioral strategies such as avoiding negative content and selecting positive content. Cognitive processing strategies such as critically evaluating body-related content, psychologically distancing from and positively reframing challenging content were also used, although less frequently. Boys appeared to exhibit greater positive agency over their bodies and social media use and tended to use more active coping styles than girls. Efforts to promote body image on social media such as body positive pages and exposing artificial social media content were considered limited in their effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626763

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies indicated low social media literacy amongst participants, including difficulty switching off from damaging posts and an inability to recognise edited versus unedited posts.

    “Three studies indicated low social media literacy amongst participants, including difficulty switching off from damaging posts and an inability to recognise edited versus unedited posts [63, 73, 82].”

    From The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people (2023) · cites this paper as [73]

    In Results, Theme 1 (page unavailable), some participants said damaging body-related images kept appearing despite efforts to avoid them. The Discussion (page unavailable) says boys were less aware of image editing, but it does not establish an inability to distinguish edited from unedited posts; it also describes high social media literacy among some participants. The broad characterization of participants as having low social media literacy is therefore overstated. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Through social media, someone else can always look better, skinnier, or prettier.

    “Through the lens of social media, someone else can always look better, skinnier, or prettier [73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greene S. Harris E. (2011). Qualitative Research Methodology: Review of the Literature and its Application to the Qualitative Component of Growing Up in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Children and Youth Affairs, 1– 83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahon, C., & Hevey, D.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Mahon, Ciara
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-05-21
Volume
12
Pages
626763-626763
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162214085
Cited by
119
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Trinity College Dublin
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
body image, social media, adolescents, gender differences, active coping, body dissatisfaction, coping strategies, body agency, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review