Cited by 137Climate Change, Adaptation, MigrationClimate change impacts on agricultureMigration and Labor Dynamics

Climate variability and migration in the Philippines

Open access
Bohra-Mishra, Pratikshya, Oppenheimer, Michael, Cai, Ruohong, Feng, Shuaizhang, Licker, Rachel·2017·Population and Environment

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of climatic variations and extremes captured by variability in temperature, precipitation, and incidents of typhoons on aggregate inter-provincial migration within the Philippines using panel data. Our results indicate that a rise in temperature and to some extent increased typhoon activity increase outmigration, while precipitation does not have a consistent, significant effect. We also find that temperature and typhoons have significant negative effects on rice yields, a proxy for agricultural productivity, and generate more outmigration from provinces that are more agriculturally dependent and have a larger share of rural population. Finally, migration decisions of males, younger individuals, and those with higher levels of education are more sensitive to rising temperature and typhoons. We conclude that temperature increase and to some extent typhoon activities promote migration, potentially through their negative effect on crop yields. The migration responses of males, more educated, and younger individuals are more sensitive to these climatic impacts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11111-016-0263-x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar evidence of environmental factors driving migration is found in Mexico and the Philippines.

    “Similar evidence is found in other contexts, such as Mexico (see Jessoe, Manning, and Taylor, 2018 [49]; Nawrotzki, Riosmena, and Hunter, 2013 [50]), and the Philippines (see Bohra-Mishra et al. 2017 [51]).”

    From A Systematic Review of International and Internal Climate-Induced Migration in Africa (2023) · cites this paper as Bohra-Mishra et al. 2017 [51]

  • A significant share of empirical evidence on environmental migration is derived from aggregated levels of analysis, bearing the danger of ecological fallacy.

    “Micro-level studies are important given that a significant share of the empirical evidence gathered so far is derived from aggregated levels of analysis, i.e., the country or provincial level (Bohra-Mishra et al., 2017; Chen & Mueller, 2019; Feng et al., 2010; Hoffmann et al., 2020; Missirian & Schlenker, 2017; Thiede et al., 2016), which bears the danger of ecological fallacy”

    From Environmental shocks and migration among a climate-vulnerable population in Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as Bohra-Mishra et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Deshingkar, P., & Natali, C. (2008). Internal migration chapter 7. In World migration 2008. Available via http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2008/02382a09.pdf.
  2. Massey DS Arango J Hugo G Kouaouci A Pellegrino A Taylor JE Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at century’s end 1998 Oxford Oxford University Press
  3. Tse, C. (2012). Do natural disasters lead to more migration? Evidence from Indonesia. Available via http://cream.conference-services.net/resources/952/3365/pdf/MGDNF2013_0075.pdf. Cited March 18, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohra-Mishra, P., Oppenheimer, M., Cai, R., Feng, S., & Licker, R.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Environmental Defense Fund (US)
  • Jinan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bohra-Mishra, Pratikshya
  • Oppenheimer, Michael
  • Cai, Ruohong
  • Feng, Shuaizhang
  • Licker, Rachel
Venue
Population and Environment
Published
2016-10-08
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
286-308
ISSN
  • 0199-0039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7810
OpenAlex
W2528355665
Cited by
137
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
15.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Population and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
climate variability, climate-induced migration, interprovincial migration, emigration, temperature, precipitation, typhoons, rice yield, agricultural productivity, rural population, agricultural dependence, Philippines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review