Cited by 1,492Climate change impacts on agricultureAgricultural risk and resilienceClimate Change Policy and Economics

Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture

Open access
Schlenker, Wolfram, Lobell, David B·2010·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

There is widespread interest in the impacts of climate change on agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and on the most effective investments to assist adaptation to these changes, yet the scientific basis for estimating production risks and prioritizing investments has been quite limited.Here we show that by combining historical crop production and weather data into a panel analysis, a robust model of yield response to climate change emerges for several key African crops.By mid-century, the mean estimates of aggregate production changes in SSA under our preferred model specification are -22, -17, -17, -18, and -8% for maize, sorghum, millet, groundnut, and cassava, respectively.In all cases except cassava, there is a 95% probability that damages exceed 7%, and a 5% probability that they exceed 27%.Moreover, countries with the highest average yields have the largest projected yield losses, suggesting that well-fertilized modern seed varieties are more susceptible to heat related losses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlenker, W., & Lobell, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2010-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
014010
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079350221
Cited by
1,492
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 63
FWCI
54.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Rockefeller Foundation
  • Office of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change impacts on agriculture, crop yield loss, sub-Saharan Africa, maize, sorghum, millet, groundnut, cassava, heat stress, agricultural adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review