Cited by 10Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy and History of ScienceEmbodied and Extended Cognition

The transcendental deduction of integrated information theory: connecting the axioms, postulates, and identity through categories

Open access
Chis-Ciure, Robert·2022·Synthese

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This paper deals with a foundational aspect of Integrated Information Theory (IIT) of consciousness: the nature of the relation between the axioms of phenomenology and the postulates of cause-effect power. There has been a lack of clarity in the literature regarding this crucial issue, for which IIT has received much criticism of its axiomatic method and basic tenets. The present contribution elucidates the problem by means of a categorial analysis of the theory’s foundations. Its main results are that: (i) IIT has a set of nine fundamental concepts of reason, called categories, which constitute its categorial lexicon and through which it formulates a system of principles incorporating the axioms, the postulates, and the central identity; and (ii) the connection between the axioms and postulates is grounded by their common root in this categorial lexicon, the categories of which find their justification by means of a phenomenological and transcendental deduction. Some further results are the unique origin of axioms and postulates in the categories; the distinction between conceptual and formalized postulates; a clarification of the uniqueness problem of categorial lexica in general; and an IIT account of objectivity by explicating how the physical is (re)defined by means of categories. All of this is put to use against various criticism targeting IIT’s theoretical core. If successful, the proposed interpretation illuminates a central issue in the contemporary study of consciousness and contributes to an environment of mutual understanding between defenders and critics of the theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11229-022-03704-z

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The operationalisation of axioms into their corresponding postulates is based on an 'inference to a good explanation' under the assumption there exists an observer-independent reality comprising reliable causal relations that can be analysed in terms of their smallest constituents.

    “The operationalisation of axioms into their corresponding postulates is based on an 'inference to a good explanation' under the assumption there exists an observer-independent reality comprising reliable causal relations that can be analysed in terms of their smallest constituents (Albantakis et al., 2023; Chis-Ciure, 2022; Tononi et al., 2022; cf. Cea et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chis-Ciure, R. (2022a). The A Priori Foundations of Integrated Information Theory: Toward a Transcendental Science of Consciousness, doctoral dissertation.
  2. Chis-Ciure, R. (2022b). Categorial Systems and Transcendental Reasoning: Why and How Theories of Consciousness Must Redefine the Meaning of Objectivity, under review.
  3. Chis-Ciure, R. (2022c). The Central Identity of Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness as Constitutive A Priori Principle, under review.
  4. Chis-Ciure, R. (2022d). Kant's A Priori in the Context of Constitutive Principles, under review.
  5. Ellia, F. (2021). Integrated Information Theory: An Empirically Testable Solution to the Mind-Body Problem, doctoral dissertation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chis-Ciure, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Chis-Ciure, Robert
Venue
Synthese
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
200
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W4281392483
Cited by
9
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Synthese (publishedVersion)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Romania-U.S. Fulbright Commission (Fulbright Student Fellowship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
integrated information theory, consciousness, transcendental deduction, phenomenology, axioms, categories, objectivity, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review